• Chahk@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can agree in principle. However, I can make exceptions for when people who vote for policies that promote and encourage discrimination experience the fruits of their labor first-hand.

    • Franzia
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, if it were extrajudicial I would agree. Leopards ate her face. But this is our country’s judicial system. It isn’t wholly owned by the far right (though it’s wildly close).

    • BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then you have no principle with which to agree. You can’t be a fair weather ethicist. You either believe in human rights for ALL, including pieces of shit, or you don’t believe in them for ANYONE.

      “Message to my enemies: when the revolution comes you’re not just gonna get the wall, Buddy, you’re gonna get four walls, a roof, clean clothes, good food, education, and quality health care, because that’s what every human being alive deserves.”

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Precisely this. I tend to extend the tolerance paradox to violence, sometimes people have never been punched in the face and it shows. Just like tolerance of intolerance only allows intolerance to spread and shit all over everything, so does pacifism in the face of violence. I don’t want her to be hurt, but she supported a system and society that sees violence against trans as a core value and she doesn’t get to shocked Pikachu when she reaps the fruits of her labors.

      Sucks to suck. 🤷

      • Nechesh@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        We don’t sentence & punish people based on their politics. That way leads only to crazy fascism.