Summary

White House aides are anxious ahead of Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” announcement on Tuesday, expecting new “reciprocal tariffs” but lacking clear details.

Even key figures like VP J.D. Vance and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles remain uncertain. An insider told Politico, “No one knows what the f–k is going on.”

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and adviser Kevin Hassett said tariffs would target 10–15 countries, but Trump contradicted them, claiming all countries would face tariffs.

The confusion and internal contradictions have sparked fears of economic fallout and political backlash.

  • ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    2 months ago

    Dementia Don is unpredictable. He has been the entire time. These people are somehow still surprised.

      • Today@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Try reading a transcript of anything he says. It’s just enough gibberish for people to hear whatever they want.

  • cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    2 months ago

    At this point we can consider ourselves lucky if he doesn’t straight up announce the annexation of either Canada or Greenland.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 months ago

      I honestly think it will be this.

    • TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s what I’m expecting. The optimist in me thinks he could pull an amnesia on wensday about tariffs to right the economy. But probably just invade Greenland or something

  • Chappy@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 months ago

    The speedrun into economic and social collapse continues as scheduled…I never thought I’d be alive to see the (very much self-inflicted) downfall of the country I was raised to love. This truly makes my soul ache.

    • shawn1122@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I think those outside the US figured it was only a matter of time. The US voting population has only become more disengaged and the country has created and is the epicenter of most social media misinformation campaigns.

      The US pulled itself out of the great depression first through regulation via the new deal and then by selling military equipment to allied nations during WW2 (essentially leveraging its geographical isolation during the war). Its been addicted to making and selling military equipment since then, in part due to the cold war but I think we can all agree there have been a few wars along the way that were essentially treated as test runs.

      Hoover’s nearly 50% tariff on agriculture stretched the depression out by a few years. If we take history as any indication, tariffs are typically either a buildup to complete economic collapse or to a public bailout. One of those seems more likely than the other now. What would a 21st century ‘New Deal’ even look like?

      • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 months ago

        What would a 21st century ‘New Deal’ even look like?

        It could look identical to the original. Restore the capital gains and high-income tax rates. Do all the infrastructure investments over again with modern tech (high speed and light rail, renewable energy, desalination, etc)

        Fair labor standards 2.0, with 32 hour workweek, guaranteed leave, triple the minimum wage, and medicare for all. The last one should save small business more than enough money and administrative overhead to pay for the rest, but tax incentives for small businesses will help too.

        Reinforce the national labor relations and social security acts. Create the political transparency act to overturn citizens united. Throw out the parties and the political bribery entirely if you can, if you can’t, limit and publicize it. Tax 1-5% of all political donations over X dollars, and feed all of it into social security and medicare. All of federal legislature, executive, and judiciary now gets their salary from social security and their healthcare from medicare.

        This wouldn’t really save the world, but it should be enough to keep the US going until we find better answers. Obviously there’s no guarantees we could find the political capital to get any of this done, even in the Great Depression 2: electric boogaloo.

      • runner_g
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Infrastructure spending, upgrading and repairing our crumbling roads in the Midwest, green energy installation, massive expansion of high speed rail, higher corporate tax rates with tax credits available to incentivize manufacturing plants be built in the US.

        • xyzzy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I agree, but FWIW those crumbling roads are entirely due to state governments. There’s a reason Oklahoma’s roads are so terrible. You literally feel the difference in governmental priorities at the state line.

  • afronaut@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    Trump is going to start WWIII and form a wartime coalition government that “postpones” our election process in the meantime. There may be no midterms.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I hope his phone call after the announcement isn’t…“Hey Vlad! Vlad! I invaded something!”

  • belly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    My assumption is he lets the tariffs play out more than a day or two this time. He might see how bad it gets first before he pulls back.