not_IO to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agowe all made it a long time agoimagemessage-square94fedilinkarrow-up11.39Kcross-posted to: degrowth@slrpnk.net
arrow-up11.39Kimagewe all made it a long time agonot_IO to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square94fedilinkcross-posted to: degrowth@slrpnk.net
minus-squarebuddascrayon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-212 hours agoWe also need to outlaw landlords. Owning land is not a job and it’s certainly not a business.
minus-squaretrashpanda@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·12 hours agoOnly raccoons could be owners of land :D
minus-squaresilasmariner@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 hours agoI think landlords make a lot of sense for commercially-zoned property, and for residentially there needs to be some way to live somewhere even if you can’t afford the mortgage deposit. So there’s nuance here that needs addressing IMO.
minus-squareSuperNovaStarlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 hours agoWe could just… give everyone a place to live. Then there’s no such thing as “can’t afford a mortgage.”
minus-squaresilasmariner@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 minutes agoDo people get to choose where they live in this scenario, or do we just allocate housing based on where’s currently unoccupied?
We also need to outlaw landlords. Owning land is not a job and it’s certainly not a business.
Only raccoons could be owners of land :D
Hard Agree.
I think landlords make a lot of sense for commercially-zoned property, and for residentially there needs to be some way to live somewhere even if you can’t afford the mortgage deposit. So there’s nuance here that needs addressing IMO.
We could just… give everyone a place to live. Then there’s no such thing as “can’t afford a mortgage.”
Do people get to choose where they live in this scenario, or do we just allocate housing based on where’s currently unoccupied?