Do you think an European Citizens’ Initiative to ban Twitter in the EU would be beneficial and have a possibility of being successful?

I’m sorry if this is not a good community for this question. If not please point me to one.

  • Tw4tnoM0r3@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    We should ban it for politicians. Why on earth would you use a for-profit foreign platform for official communication?

    • iwasnormalonce@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      37 minutes ago

      I wrote to my MP asking them to stop using it and to help to get other MPs off the platform. Everyone should write to their representativea in government asking them to do the same.

  • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This was the moment where banning twitter turned from a good idea into a non negotiable measure we need to take asap.

  • chmod755@feddit.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’d prefer tariffs on Twitter and Tesla in all EU nations until the Trump tariffs are removed --> income should be used to fund European social media and European car production

  • Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Depends what “ban” means. If it refers to them not being able to be commercially active in the EU because they violate EU regulations, sure. So no selling ads, no targeting ads, no selling blue check-marks.

    If it refers to preventing people from the EU to access their website through meddling with DNS or similar means, then i am against it. We should be able to access it, but they shouldnt be able to make money off it in the EU.

    • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      I do agree.

      Some people might need access to those sites for various reasons (journalists making research, keeping in contact with friends overseas, etc.). But we ought to inform the european population about the dangers of using those services, and preferably move politics and country-specific communication (your local police station social media account) onto european solutions.

      Cutting off or limiting the profits which american megacorps can make off the european population does also sound like a good idea.

  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    X does not and will not comply with EU rules, and thus needs to be banned until they change (i.e. indefinitely).

    • vrojak@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I am also fine with escalating fines until the problems are addressed. Say, start with 1000$ and double that every week until they comply, either they do or there’ll be a lot of money.

  • Hikuro-93@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Not a twitter/x or bluesky user, never really my type of preferred social media. So I wouldn’t miss it.

    However we must realize the most crucial factor about X in Europe, the fact that it’s a clearly compromised and biased network, highly subject to corruption, division and disinformation.

    Would the average person participate and support X if it was owned by a russian oligarch? And that russian propaganda was quite obvious within the social platform?

    Some would, sure, but the majority would mistrust it and be far more critical about potentially false information.

    So yeah, it should be categorically banned from EU nations. Not because I hate it, but because of the dangers of division it represents to our society. Specially when for those who like X-style platforms there’s already “non-regime” alternatives.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I would rather the users all realize it’s a nazi bar and stop using it, but that’s never going to happen. Too many people are oblivious, don’t care, or are pro-nazi. Shutting down the nazi bar with the power of the state is acceptable to me.

  • vesi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Yes. Freedom of speech? There is no true freedom of speech there so limiting X is not a violation of it

    • starlinguk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Banning fascists instead of accomodating them is absolutely the right thing to do. It’s accommodating them that got us into this mess.

  • nuscheltier@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    To be honest, I wouldn’t mind. I also wouldn’t mind banning any and all of social media.
    The experiment was fun while it lasted but as is often the case some people poison the well. And that happened to every social media. In my eyes every social media is very much a propaganda tool and destabilizes the democracies around the world. The corporations behind these are not moderating enough because they don’t want to or it is to costly for them or just - what I can understand - too much to do feasibly.
    So every social media should be banned. I understand that this is not what everyone thinks or wants to hear, but in my eyes the car already hit the wall and we have to live with the consequences.
    (I do fully understand that this means reddit, feddit, youtube and others. I would really miss feddit and youtube but well… I like to live in a progressive society and not in a dystopian, propaganda riddled shadow of its former self.)

  • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    A tiktok ban style law would go against freedom of speech. Better to let the EC and the courts ban Twitter based on the existing, sensible DSA law.

  • Libb@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I’m not a believer in any form of censorship. That’s not how you fight against shit ideas or products.

    Also, what would be next? Ban people not voting for the right candidate and then, those wearing socks the wrong color? According to who? That’s a dangerously slippery slope…

    I’m sorry if this is not a good community for this question. If not please point me to one.

    ‘Buy from EU’ as I see it is not ‘force people to buy from EU’ it’s more about ‘encourage people by showing them EU alternatives as honestly as possible’ (they’re not perfect, nor are they always as feature-rich as the US alternatives) ;)

    • starlinguk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      The slippery slope argument is such bullshit. The reason the Nazis got to power is because of the slippery slope argument. The reason Mussolini got into power is because of the slippery slope argument. Fascism should not be acceptable. End of story.

      Learn history.

      • brot@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Hey, the rise of fascism in Europe in the 1920s/1930s has complex origins and historians have written many books about it. There are many reasons for Hitlers and Mussolinis rise to power, so let’s not go around and give undercomplex explanations like “the slippery slope argument”

      • Libb@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Learn history.

        Repeating crap you’ve heard here or there has little to do with learning history, or learning anything for that matter but I’ve little hope this will change any time soon.

        Thanks nonetheless for that wise suggestion, we should all agree upon studying history (a lot more interesting than simply learning it, mind you).

        The slippery slope argument is such bullshit. The reason the Nazis got to power is because of the slippery slope argument. The reason Mussolini got into power is because of the slippery slope argument. Fascism should not be acceptable. End of story.

        Also, thx for such an articulated comment that excellently demonstrates as much practice as desire to discuss our diverging view points. Unless, could it be I only have a (apparently terribly wrong) personal opinion on a question upon which you speak the truth? In which case, what was that you were saying? Oh, yeah: ‘end of story’.

        Edit: small corrections