• misk@sopuli.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    This information is also confirmed by Ukrainian sources like DeepState which they cite directly. Kursk incursion is about to end and it’s been months in the making, that’s just reality of things.

    • supervent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I am not saying about this article in concret, just saying the writer is not trustworthy in general. The majority of his articles have bias to russian side. And I stopped reading when I viewed his name. And again, spanish mass media not the best option for this topic.

      • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Reality of war has a Russian bias at the moment unfortunately.

        El Pais doesn’t treat war like a movie but is that a bad thing? I haven’t heard them being described as mass media, more commonly it’s called a leftist rag.

        Can you point out any factual inaccuracies? How is that bias presenting?

        • Cassa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I was just enjoying reading the comments, but “Reality of war has a Russian bias at the moment”?

          Are you talking of their casuality rates, their supplies now donkey run, their loss of artillery firing advantage, their demographics or many more

          Or are you talking about the few kilometeres they have crawled into ukraine this year? You know, the literally slower than a snail pace they’re going.

          (I don’t know nothing about the source’s bias or anything there tho)

          • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I meant that Ukraine is now retreating from Kursk and therefore it looks like Russia has the advantage there. Yes, I am aware that Russia advances are basically a crawl but there’s no denying that Ukraine won’t hold parts of Kursk which they hoped to use as a bargaining chip in negotiations.

            • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I prefer to call them joint Russian/North Korean advances, because Russia needs to buy slaves from a pariah state to make any significant gains. As I understand, NK troops are only present in Kursk.

              • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                They probably don’t care what we call them, they have no shame. Funny thing is, we have NK slaves working in EU in plain sight as well. There’s been a report couple of years ago from Poland that got some international coverage but this has not ended then and those reports keep popping up to this day. Oh, the joys of living in a capitalist hellhole.

            • Cassa
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Yes, which is the only metric that seemingly the world and it’s news care about…

              Not the fact that by doing this Russia has destroyed it’s vast military equipment reserves from the Sovietunion, gutted it’s navy, airforce and so forth

              But yes, it is quite unfortunate - especially as it is giving putin the means to dictate the “ceasefire” that his lapdog (trump) is giving him