• anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    He’s honestly not wrong

    Frankly, efforts should be directed toward evolving more efficient and less error prone models, not seeking out the cheapest training material and hording it

    People are so blindly angry with AI tech that they’re willing to double-down on our worst corporate entitlement programs just to see Altman cry a little, and that makes me angrier than seeing a wrong AI response get passed around like gospel.

  • dotslashme@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    9 hours ago

    What a bunch of whiny children these CEOs are. It reminds me of screaming children at the grocery store who didn’t get something they wanted.

    • alexc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      And yet, in all the CEO books, they talk about disruptive innovation, and how a “change in the rules” creates new opportunities.

      Sam Altman is nothing more than a copyright violator (the courts like the term pirate) who should owe billions, if not trillions in legal penalties.

      • smokeysnilas@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        In a way Sam Altman becomes rich using the pirated data collected by Aaron Swartz. One gets to be an oligarch and the other is bullied into suicide.

        • alexc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Sad, but true. Ironic that Aaron did it to give everyone access. The other did it for greed…

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    So the software cannot improve making connections between information, only just be fed more data… I’m ignorant about how this works but that somewhat sounds like giving up.

  • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I have a better idea let’s sue them collectively for trillions in damages. Let’s kill AI entirely. We need to be fixing our climate not fulfilling the dreams of scifi nerds.

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      We’ve also already gotten some benefit for truely useful, non-copyright infringing AI (generally the kinds used by scientists evaluating big data sets like protein folding and finding exoplanets). None of those AIs rely on stolen art or stolen copyrighted material. But they have benefited somewhat from the pursuit of AI processing hardware. So even if you are pro-AI where it has shown any real value as a tool, you still don’t need the copyright infringement. Let’s kill OpenAI, and other LLMs that stole to get where they are. The actually useful AI probably won’t go anywhere, even if the companies pushing their AI the most right now all go under.