• Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yeah, but I’m sure it’ll improve in time. I can’t really see what’s the point of AI porn though, unless it’s to make images of someone who doesn’t consent, which is shit. For everything else, regular porn has it covered and looks better too.

  • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Atleast don’t censor the photos so for educational purposes only we can collectively judge if this AI art is indeed worth a damn.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    1 day ago

    Good.

    Hot take but I think AI porn will be revolutionary and mostly in a good way. Sex industry is extremely wasteful and inefficient use of our collective time that also often involves a lot of abuse and dark business practices. It’s just somehow taboo to even mention this.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Same with photoshop. I wish people didn’t do bad things with tools also, but we can’t let the worst of us all to define the world we live in.

        • coolmojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Or cutting out faces with scissors and glueing them on playboy. Scissors and glue are just tools.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Filters on online platforms are surprisingly effective, though. CivitAI is begging for it, and they’ve kept it out.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, but will also hurt the very workers’ bottom line, and with some clever workarounds, it’ll be used to fabricate defamatory material other methods were not good at.

    • JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sometimes you come across a video and you are like ‘oh this. I need more of THIS.’
      And then you start tailoring searches to try find more of the same but you keep getting generic or repeated results because the lack of well described/defined content overuse of video TAGs (obviously to try get more views with a large net rather than being specific).
      But would i watch AI content if i could feed it a description of what i want? Hell yeah!

      I mean there are only so many videos of girls giving a blowjob while he eats tacos and watches old Black & White documentaries about the advancements of mechanical production processes.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not to mention the users that may have a specific interest in some topic/action and basically all types of potential sources are locked bwhind paywalls.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Can confirm with my fetish. Some great artists and live actors who do it, but 90% of the content for it online is bad MS Paint level edits and horrid acting with props. That 10%? God tier, the community showers them in praise and commissions and only stop when they want to, unless a payment service like Visa or Patreon censors them and their livelihood as consenting adults.

          • oldfart@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            If only there was a p2p way to send people funds without anyone knowing the sender or the recipient…

  • Aggravationstation@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The year is 1997. A young boy is about to watch a porn video for the first time on a grainy VHS tape. An older version of himself from the far off year of 2025 appears.

    Me: “You know, in the future, you’ll make your own porn videos.”

    90s me: “Wow, you mean I’ll get to have lots of hot sex!?!?”

    Me: “Ha! No. So Nvidia will release this system called CUDA…”

    • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      1 day ago

      I thought this was going to go Watchmen for a moment. Like…

      It is 1997, I am a young boy, I am jerking off to a grainy porno playing over stolen cinemax.

      It is 2007, i am in my dorm, i am jerking off to a forum thread full of hi-res porno.

      It is 2027, i am jerking off to an ai porno stream that mutates to my desires in real time. I am about to nut so hard that it shatters my perception of time.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The AI camera will still zoom in on the guys nuts as you’re about to bust tho.

        • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I figured rule of threes meant it was funnier to leave it out. 2017 would have been sad gooning to pornhub during the first trump nightmare.

          Then 2027 could be sad gooning to ai hyperporn during the second trump nightmare.

          Maybe I should have used 20 year jumps, but "2037, I am jerking off because there’s no food, and the internet is nothing but ai porn.’ didn’t seem as funny a point for the “time shattering” bit.

    • turnip@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Then another company called Deepseek will release a system called low level programming that replaces CUDA.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Oh my God! That’s disgusting! AI porn online!? Where!? Where do they post those!? There’s so many of them, though. Which one?

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    157
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am going to make this statement openly on the Internet. Feel free to make AI generated porn of me as long as it involves adults. Nobody is going to believe that a video of me getting railed by a pink wolf furry is real. Everyone knows I’m not that lucky.