• TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      To be fair damn is not offensive where as dumb was used to label disabled people and then used as a generally derogatory term. I’d rather censor dumb than damn.

      Overall, we use Mute not Dumb for quite a while now, and so those saying dumb to mean stupid generally are not conflating mute with stupid, so I don’t think it’s worth fighting people over. Just vocab that shifted, even if it had a derogatory connotation at the start, being this far removed from it it’s just too late to bother.

      • otacon239@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 day ago

        But does censoring a letter change anything? Does reading f*ck read any different to fuck? Does the reader get more or less offense from it?

        Censorship doesn’t really seem to accomplish much and if anything draws extra attention to the censored word. I wouldn’t have given it a second thought without it.

        Who’s benefiting?

        • toynbee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          Usually this is because they are posting to social media and many social media environments use OCR to scan screenshots for “offensive” words. If the scanner finds something it deems unacceptable, the post will get a smaller audience or might even be disallowed.

          The censoring is for the machines, not the people.

          edit: Fixed autocorrect.

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think the reasoning is that if it’s censored, it’s an acknowledgement from whoever did so that “this word isn’t appropriate in this context, but the text is worth sharing”

          • Cornflake@pawb.socialOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            24 hours ago

            That’s probably the reason it’s been censored, but I didn’t take the original screengrab so I’m not sure

            • cadekat@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              22 hours ago

              The tip of the gun also appears censored. This is probably some misguided attempt to appease some algorithm somewhere.

        • Cornflake@pawb.socialOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Frankly, I think single-letter censoring like that is silly. It really doesn’t achieve anything and nobody benefits from it

  • Anarki_
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    You don’t need to censor “dumb”. It’s okay.

    • PyroNeurosis
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Wherever furries show up, they always seem to represent the most capable subsection of whatever it is they’re about - shooting, SysAdmining, fucking, etc. Some of this may be confirmation bias as I also don’t know many furries, but…

      At this point you should just include a headshot of a fursuit with your resume to bag a job.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        22 hours ago

        An event I went to recently had an issue with an unknown number of “orphaned radioactive sources” being left on the trade tables. Luckily, one of the furries in attendance has a gigercounter with them. They confirmed that the sources were radioactive, and did a sweep of the camp to make sure no one had taken any away. They also had the contacts to properly dispose of them.

        You can therefore add nuclear energy to your list of areas with competent furries.

        • magnetosphere@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          19 hours ago

          An event I went to recently had an issue with an unknown number of “orphaned radioactive sources” being left on the trade tables.

          What the hell kind of event was this? People were just leaving radioactive shit lying around? Someone had a Geiger counter on them? WTF!

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            18 hours ago

            EMF Camp. Its a geeky festival. It had a trade table. Basically bring geeky ‘junk’ to donate. If you find something you like, donate what you think it is worth and take it. Money goes to charity.

            The furry worked for nuclear energy. When someone recognised what the objects might be, someone let him know. He had some of his work kit with him. It was several small sources, similar to those used in schools etc. Not actually that harmful when used properly, and not broken. They put out just enough for it to be worth a sweep to check for more out on the camp. Thankfully no one seemed to have taken any.

            In the culprit’s defence. It wasn’t on the prohibited item list, though that was soon corrected.

              • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                “that was soon corrected”

                I get the feeling the sign may have been from later in the event, or a later iteration of the event.

    • CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Would a range allow costumes that big? I feel like showing up with a paper Halloween mask would get you kicked out.

      • PyroNeurosis
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Probs, but this was specifically an unsupervised one.

      • Gustephan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I mean, I’d imagine it’s no worse than training with a gas mask, and I’ve never seen somebody kicked out of a range for that