• FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    This is not really that interesting and kinda weird given the non-upgradability, but I guess it’s good for AI workloads. It’s just not that unique compared to their laptops.

    I’d love a mid-tower case with swappable front panel I/O and modular bays for optical drives; would’ve been the perfect product for Framework to make IMO.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    and more at people who want the smallest, most powerful desktop they can build

    Well, there’s this:

    Yeah, the screw holes didn’t fit, that’s why. And the cooler didn’t fit the case, obviously. And the original cooler not the CPU’s turbo.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Not really sure who this is for. With soldered RAM is less upgradeable than a regular PC.

    AI nerds maybe? Sure got a lot of RAM in there potentially attached to a GPU.

    But how capable is that really when compared to a 5090 or similar?

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      The 5090 is basically useless for AI dev/testing because it only has 32GB. Mind as well get an array of 3090s.

      The AI Max is slower and finicky, but it will run things you’d normally need an A100 the price of a car to run.

      But that aside, there are tons of workstations apps gated by nothing but VRAM capacity that this will blow open.

      • KingRandomGuy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Useless is a strong term. I do a fair amount of research on a single 4090. Lots of problems can fit in <32 GB of VRAM. Even my 3060 is good enough to run small scale tests locally.

        I’m in CV, and even with enterprise grade hardware, most folks I know are limited to 48GB (A40 and L40S, substantially cheaper and more accessible than A100/H100/H200). My advisor would always say that you should really try to set up a problem where you can iterate in a few days worth of time on a single GPU, and lots of problems are still approachable that way. Of course you’re not going to make the next SOTA VLM on a 5090, but not every problem is that big.

        • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Exactly, 32 is plenty to develop on, and why would you need to upgrade ram? It was years ago I did that in any computer let alone a tensor workstation. I feel like they made pretty good choices for what it’s for

        • Amon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          No, it runs off integrated graphics, which is a good thing because you can have a large capacity of ram dedicated to GPU loads

  • warmaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This is one stupid product. It really goes against everything the framework brand has identified with.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Desktops are already that, though. In order for them to distinguish themselves in the industry, they can’t just offer another modular desktop PC. They can’t offer prebuilts, or gaming towers, or small form factor units, or pre-specced you-build kits. They can’t even offer low-cost micro-desktops. All of those markets are saturated.

      But they can offer a cheap Mac Studio alternative. Nobody’s cracked that nut yet. And it remains to be seen if this will be it, but it certainly seems like it’s lined up to.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I’d argue not. It’s as modular/repairable as the platform can be (with them outright stating the problematic soldered RAM), and not exorbitantly priced for what it is.

      But what I think is most “Framework” is shooting for a niche big OEMs have completely flubbed or enshittified. There’s a market (like me) that wants precisely this, not like a framework-branded gaming tower or whatever else a desktop would look like.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    “To enable the massive 256GB/s memory bandwidth that Ryzen AI Max delivers, the LPDDR5x is soldered,” writes Framework CEO Nirav Patel in a post about today’s announcements. “We spent months working with AMD to explore ways around this but ultimately determined that it wasn’t technically feasible to land modular memory at high throughput with the 256-bit memory bus. Because the memory is non-upgradeable, we’re being deliberate in making memory pricing more reasonable than you might find with other brands.”

    😒🍎

    Edit: to be clear, I was only trying to point out that “we’re being deliberate in making memory pricing more reasonable than you might find with other brands” is clearly targeting the Mac Mini, because Apple likes to price-gouge on RAM upgrades. (“Unamused face looking at Apple,” get it? Maybe I emoji’d wrong.) My comment is not meant to be an opinion about the soldered RAM.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      Ok, should I know who framework is? I’ve been a PC gamer since forever and I’ve never heard of this company.

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Lmao the news about this desktop is strangling their website to the point of needing a 45 minute waiting list

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I visited their website literally within about 10 minutes of them announcing the product and I had to wait 8 minutes to get in.

      If framework has, or had, one problem, it was that the main appeal of their products was the repairability, the products themselves were only okay in terms of specs. Well now they have really decent specs as well.

      I could absolutely see schools wanting to deploy these to their students.

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yeah that touchscreen tablet convertible machine is what has me psyched. I’m not the target for it, and already own a 16, but I could see that thing selling well. I honestly think they came out with the desktop because they just kinda felt they needed a desktop.

        • Evrala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I have a 16 and a 13, I thought I’d give away the 13 when I got the 16 but I keep using the 13 as well cause of how portable it is. Lot nicer to lounge about with the 13 than the 16.

          I might get the 12 to replace my 13 and use it for drawing practice and web browsing. Performance wise it’d be a downgrade from my 1280p but I don’t really need the performance.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This is a standard a370 mini PC at a high price.

    There’s Beelink, Minisforum, Aoostar and many others.

  • ganoo_slash_linux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I feel like this is a big miss by framework. Maybe I just don’t understand because I already own a Velka 3 that i used happily for years and building small form factor with standard parts seems better than what this is offering. Better as in better performance, aesthetics, space optimization, upgradeability - SFF is not a cheap or easy way to build a computer.

    The biggest constraint building in the sub-5 liter format is GPU compatibility because not many manufacturers even make boards in the <180mm length category. Also can’t go much higher than 150-200 watts because cooling is so difficult. There are still options though, i rocked a PNY 1660 super for a long time, and the current most powerful option is a 4060ti. Although upgrades are limited to what manufacturers occasionally produce, it is upgradeable, and it is truly desktop performance.

    On the CPU side, you can physically put in whatever CPU you want. The only limitation is that the cooler, alpenfohn black ridge or noctua l9a/l9i, probably won’t have a good time cooling 100+ watts without aggressive undervolting and power limits. 65 watts TDP still gives you a ryzen 7 9700x.

    Motherboards have the SFF tax but are high quality in general. Flex ATX PSUs were a bit harder to find 5 or 6 years ago but now the black 600W enhance ENP is readily available from Velkase’s website. Drives and memory are completely standard. m.2 fits with the motherboard, 2.5in SATA also fits in one of the corners. Normal low profile DDR5 is replaceable / upgradeable.

    What framework is releasing is more like a laptop board in a ~4 liter case and I really don’t like that in order to upgrade any part of CPU, GPU or memory you have to replace the entire board because it’s soldered on APU and not socketed or discrete components. Framework’s enclosure hasn’t been designed to hold a motherboard+discrete GPU and the board doesn’t have a PCIe slot if you wanted to attach a card via riser in another case. It could be worse but I don’t see this as a good use of development resources.

    • Acters@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I think the biggest limiting factor for your mini PC will always be the VRAM and any workload that enjoys that fast RAM speed. Really, I think this mini PC from framework is only sensible for certain workloads. It was poised as a mobile chip and certainly is majorly power efficient. On the other hand I don’t think it is for large scaling but more for testing at home or working at home on the cheap. It isn’t something I expected from framework though as I expected them to maintain modularity and the only modularity here is the little USB cards and the 3D printed front panel designs lol

      Edit
      Personally I am in that niche market of high RAM speed. Also, access to high VRAM for occasional LLM testing. Though it is an AMD and I don’t know if am comfortable switching from Nvidia for that workload just yet. Renting a GPU is just barely cheap enough.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Holy moly this is awesome! I am in for the 128GB SKU.

    That’s 96GB of usable VRAM! And way more CPU bandwidth than any desktop Zen chip.

    I know people are going to complain about non upgradable memory, but you can just replace the board, and in this case it’s so worth it for the speed/power efficiency. This isn’t artificial crippling, it physically has to be soldered, at least until LPCAMM catches on.

    My only ask would be a full X16 (or at least a physical X16/electrical x8) PCIe slot or breakout ribbon. X4 would be a bit of a bottleneck for some GPUs/workloads… Does Strix Halo even support that?

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      but you can just replace the board

      The board is like, the whole computer tho. The mobo, CPU, GPU and RAM are all the same component. It’s everything Framework is supposed to oppose. That took them what, 4 years? to throw away their values?

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They also announced three other products (one new, two refreshes) which are still being actively developed and are fully-modular devices at low cost. If they’re “throwing away their values,” they’re not doing it very well.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          It’s never a single step process. These things happen slowly, bit by bit. It’s the beginning of the end.

          • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            20 minutes ago

            If this is it happening bit by bit, then why is most of the news about them doubling down on their principles? Why did they make clear what they were doing and why, and talk about their work to make it modular, instead of trying to hide it or sweep it under the rug?

            This sort of doomerism and slippery slope purity test nonsense is exactly why niche companies that do what people value eventually go under, leaving us with just the awful ones. This isn’t a betrayal of their values. This isn’t the beginning of the end. It’s just a choice they made, and all of the other choices they made confirm that they’re still doing stuff the way they were.

            Edit: I’m not saying you have to buy it, or that you shouldn’t make clear to the company you don’t think this comports with what you want them to value. But writing them off forever based on this one product seems so self-defeating.

    • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I understand the memory constraints but it does feel weird for framework, is all I have to say. But that’s also the general trajectory of computing from what it seems. I really want lpcamm to catch on!

      • Scholars_Mate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Apparently Framework did try to get AMD to use LPCAMM, but it just didn’t work from a signal integrity standpoint at the kind of speeds they need to run the memory at.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Sounds like it doesn’t bode well for the future of DIMMs at all, TBH.

          • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            My AM5 system doesn’t post with 128GB of 5600 DDR5 at higher than 4400 at JEDEC timings and voltage. 2 DIMMs are fine. 4 DIMMs… rip. So I’d say the present of DIMMs is already a bit shaky. DIMMs are great for lots of cheap RAM. I paid a lot less than what I’d have to pay for the equivalent size of RAM in a Framework desktop.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Eventually most system RAM will have to be packaged anyway. Physics dictates that one pays a penalty going over pins and mobo traces, and it gets more severe with every advancement.

        It’s possible that external RAM will eventually evolve into a “2nd tier” of system memory, for background processes, spillover, inactive programs/data, things like that.

    • alleycat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      What’s a SKU? Google just says “Stock Keeping Unit”, but I don’t think that’s correct in this context.

  • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Much like their laptops, I’m all for the idea, but what makes this desirable by those of us with no interest in AI?

    I’m out of that loop though I get that AI is typically graphics processing heavy, can this be taken advantage of with other things like video rendering?

    I just don’t know exactly what an AI CPU such as the Ryzen AI Max offers over a non-AI equivalent processor.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      what makes this desirable by those of us with no interest in AI?

      Juat maybe not all products need to be for everyone.
      Sometimes it’s fine if a product fits your label of “Not for me”.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      There is a massive push right now for energy efficient alternatives to nvidia GPUs for AI/ML. PLENTY of companies are dumping massive amounts of money on macs and rapidly learning the lesson the rest of us learned decades ago in terms of power and performance.

      The reality is that this is going to be marketed for AI because it has an APU which, keeping it simple, is a CPU+GPU. And plenty of companies are going to rush to buy them for that and a very limited subset will have a good experience because they don’t have time sensitive operations.

      But yeah, this is very much geared for light-moderate gaming, video rendering, and HTPCs. That is what APUs are actually good for. They make amazing workstations. I could also see this potentially being very useful for a small business/household local LLM for stuff like code generation and the like but… those small scale models don’t need anywhere near these resources.

      As for framework being involved: Someone has kindly explained to me that even though you have to replace the entire mobo to increase the amount of memory, you can still customize your side panels at any moment so I guess that is fitting the mission statement.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        For modularity: There’s also modular front I/O using the existing USB-C cards, and everything they installed uses standard connectors.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      There’s lots of workstation niches that are gated by VRAM size, like very complex rendering, scientific workloads, image/video processing… It’s not mega fast, but basically this can do things at a reasonable speed that you’d normally need a $20K+ computer to even try. Like, if something takes hours on an A6000 Ada or an A100, just waiting overnight on one of these is not a big deal. Cashing or failing to launch on a 4090 or 7900 XTX is.

      That aside, the IGP is massively faster than any other integrated graphics you’ll find. It’s reasonably power efficient.

    • miss phant
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I hate how power hungry the regular desktop platform is so having capable APUs like this that will use less power at full load than a comparable CPU+GPU combo at idle, is great, though it needs to become a lot more affordable.

      • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Production costs are not low either, and AMD still needs to profit. AMD’s APUs are already very affordable.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Much like their laptops

      Its nothing like their laptops, thats the issue :/ Soldered in stuff all around, nonstandard parts that make it useless for use as a standard PC or gaming console.

      • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Sorry, I was stating that “much like their laptops, I like the idea of these desktops.” I was not trying to insinuate that they themselves are alike.

  • SuperSleuth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    What’s crazy is I still can’t make it onto their website without waiting in a 20 minute queue. Stupid.

  • 4shtonButcher@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Now, can we have a cool European company doing similar stuff? At the rate it’s going I can’t decide whether I shouldn’t buy American because I don’t want to support a fascist country or because I’m afraid the country might crumble so badly that I can’t count on getting service for my device.

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    15 hours ago

    So… now Framework Corp is selling non-upgradable hardware?

    I dunno. Conceptually I want to like Framework. But their pricing means it is basically never worth buying and upgrading versus just buying a new laptop (seriously, run the numbers. You basically save 10 bucks over two generations of shopping at Best Buy). But they also have a system that heavily encourages people to horde spare parts rather than just take it to an e-waste disposal facility/bin.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      their pricing means it is basically never worth buying and upgrading versus just buying a new laptop (seriously, run the numbers. You basically save 10 bucks over two generations of shopping at Best Buy).

      Maybe so. But the big difference is, you can upgrade iteratively rather than taking the entire hit of a new device all at once. So I can buy all of the individual components of my next laptop a few hundred dollars at a time over the course of a couple of years, and use them as I get them. By the time I’ve ship-of-theseus’d the whole device, I may have spent the same amount of money on that new computer, but I paced it how I wanted it. Then I put all of the old components into an enclosure and now I can use it as a media center or whatever. Plus, if something breaks, I can fix it.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      You get fast memory as a result. If you don’t care about the fast memory, there’s no good reason to buy this, with their motherboard. There’s a use case this serves which can’t be served by traditional slotted memory and the alternative is to buy 4-5 NVIDIA 3090/4090/5090. If you want that use case, then this is a pretty good deal.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        And your phone isn’t repairable because it needs to be water proof. Your earbuds because of power efficiency. Etc.

        Also, I suggest watching this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3zB9EFntmA.

        But, to be clear: I am actually not as opposed to the idea of soldered ram when you have “an excuse”. Same with phones. But framework is a brand that tries to build itself on minimizing e-waste and maximizing repairability and… hey, at least we can still swap out the side panel on their prebuilt!

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          As far as I read LPCAMM in its current state does not work for this. The electrical noise is too high. These things aren’t the same. A repairable waterproof phone can be made without glue by making it a bit thicker. In the case of RAM today, we’re hitting fundamental physics limitations with speed of electricity and noise. At this point the physical interconnect itself becomes a problem. Gold contact points become antennas that induce noise into adjacent parts of the system. I’m not trying to excuse Framework here. I’m saying that the difficulty here borders on the impossible. If this RAM was soldered and it had bandwidth no different than SODIMM or LPCAMM modules then I’d say Framework fucked up making it soldered, majorly. As I said, there’s no point buying this if you don’t care about the fast RAM and use cases that need it like LLMs. Regular ITX board with regular AM5 is the way to go.

          E: To be clear, if this bandwidth could be achieved with LPCAMM, then Framework fucked up.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      It will be faster than most next-gen laptops, and it’s much cheaper than a similarly-specced Asus Z13. Strix Halo uses a quad channel 8533Mhz bus, 2 full Zen CCDs like you find in desktops/servers, and a 40 CU GPU. Its more than twice the size/performance of two true “laptop chips” put together.

      Everything except the APU/RAM/Mobo combo is upgradable, and you don’t have to replace the whole machine if the board fails.

      I mean, if you don’t need that kind of compute/RAM, this system is not for you, and old gaming desktops are probably better deals for pure gaming. But this thing has a niche.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Everything except the APU/RAM/Mobo combo is upgradable, and you don’t have to replace the whole machine if the board fails.

        So… storage, case, and USB C dongles?

        • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Fans, case, ports, side panel, …
          Whatever you do with a pc, you can do with this.
          Just not separately replace ram and cpu because of the cpu design of amd.

          Hell, it can be connected to another one to make on hell of a compute monster too.

      • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I think the framework desktop would be an absolute powerhouse as a workstation desktop.
        Think developers ( that still use desktops ), people who do raw computational power for science, servers, ai development, …

    • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      No, the pc is upgradable. They explicitly said in the event that the desktop was suppose to be an actual desktop with replaceable parts as much as technically possible. Only ram is tied to the mobo/cpu because of technical limitations of the amd cpu

    • naonintendois@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You can order those directly from chip suppliers (mouser, digikey, arrow, etc.) for a lower cost than you could get them from framework. Also those are going to be very difficult to solder/desolder. You’re going to need a hot air station, and you need to pre-warm the board to manage the heat sink from the ground planes.

      • Trimatrix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Not as impossible sounding. I mean I would never attempt it but you might be able to get away with it using a stencil, solder paste and one of those fancy toaster ovens with a broil setting. ROI would suck since you are probably gonna fail the first couple of times.