• Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    We choose our levels of anonymity. You responded to Chris, who uses his full name as a handle, and I’m responding to you as literally the only person in the world with my name. ID verification is an unnecessarily onerous requirement that just adds more PII to the insatiable maws of tech firms.

    You can self-select being open about your identity, and that seems a good middle ground. Facebook has had a real-name requirement for quite some time, and it didn’t exactly settle into civil discourse as a result of that policy change.

    • TehPers@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I think what I was more hoping that would address are anonymous (and sometimes fake) personas spreading hatred and misinformation publicly and loudly. I guess the problem though is that even without anonymity, people still do it anyway, and Facebook and Twitter are great examples of that. I think having control over your own anonymity is important. I just wish there was less of a feeling that you can harm and disrespect others without consequence.

      • Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’s taken rather seriously on Beehaw, but we of course have no control over what happens on other instances.

        I think the issue is people just want a drop-in Reddit replacement via Lemmy, which is easily enough done to a certain degree on other instances. Having control over your Web presence takes effort. Choosing not to put that effort in is a personal decision.