Way, way too many websites. I have to research all of them just to use one? I have choice paralysis! The corporations are right, I shouldn’t be trusted to make decisions for myself, and the internet should be like cable.
I mean META is actually doing this! #aBoringDystopia
65% of Nigerians, and 61% of Indonesians agree with the statement that “Facebook is the Internet”
This is extremely worrying.
I used to want this unironically, id pay $30 a month to not see any ads AT ALL. However my mind has changed. I now see ad companies as immoral and, quite frankly, evil.
I would rather not only not give them money, but I choose to use a Ublock Origin fork AdNauseam that ‘clicks’ on all the ads. This seems counter intuitive, but since some advertisers pay per click so clicking a total of a combined 10,000 advertisements on my desktop/laptop/steam deck/whatever costs them a LOT of money, and I’ve bought 0 products from advertisements because i haven’t seen any advertisements!
The best part is that you get an image of all the ads. It’s super cool to look and see what they want you to buy and you can play the guessing game of “What Was My ADHD Ass Looking At?!”
(this SS is from ~2 months in iirc, now I’m ~6-10 months in, I’ll have to check when I get home.)
I’d never heard of AdNauseam; does it replace uBlock entirely? Is it possible to run both?
Just run adnauseam on its own. I use it too, my thinking is that I am going to be tracked anyway. So instead of trying and almost certainly failing at avoiding it, you just overwhelm them with so much random data that it becomes worthless.
Makes sense, thanks!
It is literally a fork of uBO
Got it, thanks for clarifying.
It’s already like this in many countries in Asia. They offer data pacakages that are 50GB (for example) for social media data , and only 1GB for regular internet
my former ukrainian data plan only had 100mb per day, but 10gb on Youtube and unlimited social media (e.g. facebook and reddit + messenger apps like viber, signal and telegram)
to be fair, its not the norm here and it was cheap af back when i was using it (around 1-2$/mo while all other data plans were over 4-6$)
also i was using a vpn with an ssn spoofing feature to make it think all of the websites/services i was visiting were Youtube (that only worked for tcp traffic tho, not udp so no gaming)
and was using telegram bots to download flarge files (there are bots that will take a url and will either return a file located there or a rendered web page)
Damn thats rad! I will try this! I need to do this! Worst caee senario the ISP might block me if they found out xD
They offer data pacakages that are 50GB (for example) for social media data , and only 1GB for regular internet
In fairness, social media and streaming are absolute data hogs. I could get by very easily with 1GB for the old school message board internet of the early '00s.
No idea how anyone uses internet for business purposes, though.
Yes, but only the social media that paid to be included in the plan in the first place. That just continues monopolies.
PACK 1a
€5/month
Get access to “my self-hosted VPN + obfuscation proxy”
IP over WhatsApp?
$99999 to access lemmy
What’s the alternative to the corporate web? Tor? Usenet?
If the full extent of this kind of internet existed, Tor would be completely irrelevant on it. Imagine that there essentially are no other sites than what’s approved by isps. It’s the cable model.
Not that such a wild vision of the internet has any chance of taking hold now days. The point of the thread was to make fun of the people who are complaining about lemmy providing too much choice.
They can’t stop people from hosting private servers or creating protocols for bypassing restrictions. And even if they did, things like SSH and remote desktop would be completely useless, but those are necessary for maintaining even the corporate web.
What about the snowflake proxies? Dont those go through microsoft?
Worst case, could have regional intranets. Like people just connect their routers with eachother. Sneakernet over large media between disconnected regions.
But that’s me getting way ahead of myself.
This looks like a lot of fun :)
We’ll need a critical mass of well distributed nerds to make this happen.
I’m having a hard time wording my comment, so forgive the clumsiness. I’m finding it very interesting that for this particular application, we may not have the nerds well distributed enough. Though, we should, since the distribution part is the point.
Where the fuck is all the usefull stuff, it’s only socials? Where’s maps, or a shared drive
$100/month tier of course
I was talking to someone online who is in Ghana and this is how it is there.
Snapchat belongs in the free tier.
Anyone else remember AOL Keywords? Lol
This will make Amazon a wee bit unhappy.
They’ll be fine being part of the “base package.”
If they pay for it. The ISP would hold both hands open to get money.
Crap, I’d have to get the everything package. Only due to not using any of those platforms but YouTube. Even that I could live without.
This is literally what happens when people defend first-past-the-post! “More than 2 viable choices at the ballot box is scary!” “I need my corporate politicians to protect me from using my brain”
I’m no fan of FPTP, but that point doesn’t apply here. Democrats have consistently supported Net Neutrality.
Net Neutrality was first legislated by the Democratic majority in the FCC in 2015. Then it was repealed by the Republican majority, championed by Pai and Carr in 2018. It was reinstated in 2024 when the Democrats regained majority of the FCC.
Can’t say I’ve ever seen anyone defend the system in play, just recognizing that it exists and until it’s changed in whatever means possible that playing the protest/spoiler is likely to make things worse.
To be fair I heard these talking points from republicans. The most brainwashed.
It shouldn’t be discounted, either, that they’re willfully abusing perception.
It’s like when they argue that voter suppression or them winning without a majority of the vote is actually what was intended because that’s why we’re a Republic and not a direct democracy.
Like, I don’t doubt that there were founders who would be sympathetic of depriving certain groups the vote (after all, they hadn’t given them the vote in the first place for that very reason) but “tyranny of the majority” very much wasn’t meant to mean outright suppression like through a carceral system.
It meant boosting minority opinions so you’d have to actually address and debate with them rather than rushing past.
But they know most people won’t have familiarity with the concept so they argue that their suppression of representation is actually a good thing, though I cannot believe anyone who’s passingly familiar with these concepts could say that and truly mean it.
You think that’s choice paralysis, I’ve got 5,200 movies, 260 series, quarter million songs on my Plex. It’s exhausting.
holy shit! how many terabytes is that?
Not too much, x265 has great compression. I bought 4x 20TB drives last summer and they’re RAID 10, so roughly 36TB of storage in my truenas.
Why would you do that? You can just watch Star Wars recycle the same story over and over.
Everything**
**Sites only we deemed brand safe for you to consume
Well of course.
2400€/m (gov clearance needed) for static IP address.
