• ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh it’s photos of Ozzy taken by a professional photographer that were posted without the photographer’s permission.

  • deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    I get the reasoning behind the photographer having the rights to photos, but it just doesn’t sit right that the human subject of those photos has no rights at all.

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    Bruh I’m a nobody and even i make sure to get permission from photographers to post their photos of me. lol

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ozzy Osbourne is still alive?! …we need an autopsy crew to just start following him around 24/7. Whatever trial-of-the-grass shit all those drugs did to his body, there’s some Witcher level mutagens going on here that we would do well to investigate when he finally does die.

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “The accounts are key components of the defendant’s popular and lucrative commercial enterprise,” Zlozower’s lawsuit states. “Defendant has over 12 million followers on [Facebook], and over 6 million followers on [Instagram], and over 5 million followers on [X] — all of which are monetized and provide significant financial benefits to the defendant.”

    Among the images are some of Ozzy standing with Zakk Wylde and hugging the late Randy Rhoads, who died in 1982.

    What an unbelievable shit-heel.

  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Funniest thing I ever saw on “reality” TV was the food fight the Osbournes had with their noisy neighbors in the middle of the night