• teije9
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    that’s still waaayyyy more efficient than coal

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That is a different level entirely.

      The mass-energy conversion from chemical processes is extremely small compared to nuclear processes, you can’t really compare the in any meaningful way