• IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is the equivalent of being allowed to have your meetings in someone’s private home and then one day the private homeowner says … nah, you can’t come in here any more.

    It’s not your house, you have no rights there and you never will, no matter how popular your room in someone’s private house was.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      In a way yes, but the homeowner also threw out the group DnD table you made, burnt it, and destroyed all the character sheets that were stored in the table. Even if it’s technically within their rights, it’s an absolute dick move, and they should be shamed for it.

      I know it’s temporary, but we all know it is “temporary”. It’s only a matter of time before it becomes permanent at the request of our new wannabe dictators, or their corporate stooges.

      This is just a trial run.

  • lolola
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    they were banned? for what? defying the “sex assigned at conception” thing?

      • lolola
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        Damn. I swear, there are so many trial balloons in the headlines these days that they could collectively lift a house and fly it through a Pixar movie.

    • fxomt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      they were banned? for what

      Reddit’s trying to make their content as appealable to advertisers as much as possible.

      I, for one welcome the waves of trans, and or horny people to the gates.