• heleos@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I tried Gentoo recently and I really liked it when I finally figured everything out. I wanted the latest packages similar to arch, but I was basically spending at least an hour every time I started my computer updating. I still really like Gentoo, but it just isn’t for me right now. I appreciate what it taught me about Linux though

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      What did Gentoo teach you about Linux?

      I main it (and am never switching again btw), but I learned absolutely nothing new. Packages build themselves, and everything works.

      I was hoping to learn new things about compiling from source, but I guess I will have to make ebuilds for that.

    • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      Compiling dependencies for an hour or so every time I wanted to install something also got a bit old.

  • wisely@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It took me way too long to realize I wasn’t looking at a mummified corpse and Gandalf.

  • gi1242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I used Gentoo for 3y. in hindsight I wasted so many CPU cycles just because I thought --march=native would make things faster.

    nope.

    you know what made things faster? switching to arch 😂

      • Im_old@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yes, I tried it around 2002/2003, back when the recommended way was from stage1. I think I had a P4 with HT. It was noticeably faster than redhat or mandrake (yes, I was distro hopping a lot). Emerge gnome-mono was a night run. Openoffice about 24hrs.

        Lots of wasted time but I did learn how to setup some things manually.

      • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Most of the reason to build your own packages is a form of runtime assurance - to know what your computer is running is 100% what you intend.

        At least as a guix user that’s what I tell myself.

        • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Compiling your own packages only ensures that, well, you’re running packages that you compiled. This definitely does not mean that your computer is running what you intend at all.

          Half the time I don’t know what my CPU is executing, and that’s code that I wrote myself.

          • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            This definitely does not mean that your computer is running what you intend at all.

            This is true of all programming

  • Tony Bark@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Back in the early 2010s, I had a friend told me that his computer crashed trying to compile all of Gentoo.

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m not even ready for Arch because I can’t make decisions for myself.

  • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    NixOS is the better source-based distro. Everything can compile from source, but you can also use the binary cache if you don’t want to.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        In my experience the only people who find the name Fedora fine are the ones who unironically wear trillbies

  • crawancon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Pepperidge Farms remembers compiling apps via the grimoire spells in sorcerer Linux.