floofloof@lemmy.ca to U.S. News@beehaw.orgEnglish · 13 hours agoCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up162cross-posted to: medicine@mander.xyzscience@lemmy.worldtransgender@lemmy.ml
arrow-up162external-linkCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to U.S. News@beehaw.orgEnglish · 13 hours agomessage-square7fedilinkcross-posted to: medicine@mander.xyzscience@lemmy.worldtransgender@lemmy.ml
minus-squarenotabot@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·7 hours agoWould the journals be under any obligation to accept these bad-faith revisions or retractions?
minus-squareMidnitte@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 hours agoThe for-profit journals that are asking for more money, your asking what might motivate them?
minus-squarenotabot@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoThey already have the money for the original paper, do they charge for retractions? I don’t know, but I’d assumed not.
minus-squareMidnitte@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 hour agoI’m sure they’d love to charge more for retractions.
Would the journals be under any obligation to accept these bad-faith revisions or retractions?
The for-profit journals that are asking for more money, your asking what might motivate them?
They already have the money for the original paper, do they charge for retractions? I don’t know, but I’d assumed not.
I’m sure they’d love to charge more for retractions.