Summary

Ken Martin, chair of Minnesota’s Democratic–Farmer–Labor party, won the race to lead the Democratic National Committee, defeating Wisconsin’s Ben Wikler.

Martin takes over as Democrats grapple with major losses in the 2024 elections and seek to reconnect with working-class voters.

Supporters see his leadership as key to rebuilding the party, while critics worry it signals a continuation of the status quo.

His first major test will be the 2026 midterms as Democrats attempt to reclaim the House and rebuild their electoral strategy.

  • kittenzrulz123
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Now more than ever is the time to put the Democrat party in the dirt. Over the next four years American workers can and must establish a party for the workers.

  • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    As no one is talking about who Martin is let’s go over his accomplishments and how he could be positive for the party:

    Since he became leader of the state party, 14 years ago, they have not lost a statewide race.

    He talks about how they need to appeal to working class voters again.

    He frames himself as a pro-labor progressive.

    Pelosi and Schumer wanted his opponent.

    He said this during his victory speech

    “Are we on the side of the robber baron, the ultrawealthy billionaire, the oil and gas polluter, the union buster?” Mr. Martin asked. “Or are we on the side of the American working family, the small-business owner, the farmer, the immigrant and the students?”

    He also talks about how we need a country wide approach not specific states. He wants people to be running everywhere.

    He’s one of the better candidates that could have won. Not perfect, but definitely better than some of the other candidates.

    Important edit: he also talked about how there were “good” billionaires and “bad” billionaires which is bs. But there is a reality that it’s gonna be hard to run a campaign and win without the support of any possible billionaire. I mean, one of the reasons the GOP won this time around was because the billionaires manipulated shit. We should still make it so that billionaires don’t exist because having a system that creates them is insane. But also, it’s hard to win in the current system without them.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      “Are we on the side of the robber baron, the ultrawealthy billionaire, the oil and gas polluter, the union buster?” Mr. Martin asked. “Or are we on the side of the American working family, the small-business owner, the farmer, the immigrant and the students?”

      Yes and never, respectively.

      Important edit: he also talked about how there were “good” billionaires and “bad” billionaires which is bs.

      Yeah. His wing of the party doesn’t seriously believe that there is such a thing as a bad billionaire.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    You watch. They will double down on trying to peel away Republicans.

    This was my last vote for “not as bad as Trump.” They need to sit down with the few progressives they’ve allowed to force their way into the party and bring me a platform I can feel good about. Step one of that is going to be not continuing the rightward slide of the party.

    This was already as bad an election outcome as I could possibly imagine, DNC. If we have an actual framework for free elections still in existence for the next one, I’m not going to vote for what I hope and think you might do if you can suck up to enough conservatives to get you into the whitehouse. You need to come with a platform that’s going to excite me.

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      16 hours ago

      As a non Democrat, why would Democrats try to pull away republicans when republicans have been playing politics like a team game?

      Build your own damn team and give them a reason to be on your team.

      Biden and Harris only got my votes because Trump has shown himself to be a piece of shit and Republicans are either throwing a blind eye or playing along in his game or Nazi.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        16 hours ago

        As a non Democrat, why would Democrats try to pull away republicans when republicans have been playing politics like a team game?

        No disagreement from me.

        Build your own damn team and give them a reason to be on your team.

        Yep

        Biden and Harris only got my votes because Trump has shown himself to be a piece of shit and Republicans are either throwing a blind eye or playing along in his game or Nazi.

        Yep. But we can’t sink any lower, so that was the last time. If we get another election, they need to inspire me with something better than just being less conservative than the Nazi party.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Yep. But we can’t sink any lower, so that was the last time.

          As long as Republicans move to the right, Democrats will too.

      • riverSpirit@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Because they took leftist votes for granted.

        Dems always expect the left to fall in line and back them, hence why they feel they are free to consistently move further right rather than to appeal to the wishes of their voters, because after all, what are the leftists going to do, vote Trump?

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        As a non Democrat, why would Democrats try to pull away republicans when republicans have been playing politics like a team game?

        Because the alternative involves treating the left flank of the party like they are human beings with agency.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Harris lost in 2024 because Latino and Gen Z males who voted for Biden in 2020 swung to Trump in 2024.

        Those voters are centrist/independents, and identify as neither Democrat nor Republican. They voted Democrat in 2020 and Democrats need to win them back in 2028.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Anyone who still thinks “capture the center” is how politics works when Donald Trump enthusiastically diving to the right beat Kamala Harris campaigning with actual Republicans isn’t willing to update their priors with new information.

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            It didn’t work for Kamala Harris. But it’s how Biden beat Trump. And it worked for over 20 sitting Democratic governors, one of whom will very likely be the next Democratic nominee.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              There weren’t even 20 governors up for reelection and most of them weren’t competitive. You’re literally just making up data to support a conclusion that blatantly contradicts actual real life.

              • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 hours ago

                One of those governors will likely be the next Democratic nominee. And they all have a history of running as centrists. Not just in 2024, but in all of their previous campaigns.

                Newsom, Pritzker, Beshear, Shapiro, etc aren’t going to spontaneously embrace socialism in 2028. And I’m sorry to disappoint you, but an 82 year old Bernie Sanders won’t be running in 2028.

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Not this time. But Obama and Clinton successfully ran as a centrists, and I expect Democrats will try again in the future.

              • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 hours ago

                They should only change if a different approach were proven to work better.

                Practically speaking, that means leftists need to consistently win gubernatorial elections before a leftist can become a presidential nominee.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  They should only change if a different approach were proven to work better.

                  Sounds like an excuse to never try another approach.

                  Practically speaking, that means leftists need to consistently win gubernatorial elections before a leftist can become a presidential nominee.

                  I wonder what the new goalpost will be when the party’s best efforts are longer sufficient to keep progressives out of gubernatorial races.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Have you ever even heard of him before? Yet you’ve already decided to give up on him and the Democrats. You’ve already written then off, why should they bother trying to win your vote?

      And this is in the face of what we’ve all watched Trump do over the last week.

      This whole attitude you have is why the country is in the mess it’s in.

      Damnit, I just saw the ml. I shouldn’t have engaged.

  • BigFig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    17 hours ago

    DNC Elects “Guy you’ve never heard of” to drive up public engagement in the DNC

    • TomMasz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      He beat out another “Guy you never heard of” for the position. The Dems are doomed.

          • Bone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            “Since March 8, 2024, the Republican National Committee has been co-chaired by Lara Trump and Michael Whatley”. So, sure. That’s close enough. And before that some names no one heard of either. I just don’t get the point of thinking that the RNC and DNC chair would be someone you’d already know. Maybe that should change, but it’s the case presently for most people to not know the chair beforehand, for either party.

    • Tiefling IRL
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      TBF, how many Democrats give a fuck about who the chair is. Can you name the last 3 chairs?

      • BigFig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Yes I can. Debbie Wasserman-Shultz, Tom Perez, and Jaime Harrison. Pretty easy if you actually pay attention to american politics

  • riverSpirit@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Ken, “We will happily take bribes from good billionaires but not the bad billionaires”, Martin won?

    Oh great, nothing will change.