Summary

Nobel Peace Prize winner Malala Yousafzai condemned the Taliban’s treatment of women at a Pakistan summit on girls’ education in Muslim communities, stating, “The Taliban do not see women as human beings.”

She criticized their policies banning Afghan girls from education and work as “gender apartheid” and un-Islamic.

Afghanistan is the only country banning education for girls beyond grade six, affecting 1.5 million girls.

Malala urged Muslim leaders to challenge these practices and advocate for girls’ education globally.

The Taliban declined to attend or comment.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why do you jump to religion and not simply conclude that the Talibans are massive incels? You do realize that out of two billion Muslims only the Taliban are doing this shit right? Malala is calling them un-Islamic for a reason.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        3 months ago

        religion is in itself a ridiculous premise, and the type is largely irrelevant (islam/christianity).

        they are a disease that should be eradicated. humanity will never move forward with such archaic ideas.

          • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            3 months ago

            all religions were created by con artists. theyre just tools used to control other humans. its nothing more than that.

            islam itself founded by a pedophilic warlord. volume of the indoctrinated is irrelevant. kinda funny how the best predictor of which of these cults any particular human follows is geography.

              • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                3 months ago

                o0o0 sick burn. hard to refute reality.

                every holy book has been written by humans with something to gain in their use. christianity responsible for some of the largest swaths of dead humans in the crusades. the bible crafted by carefully selected passages by humans across millennia. even modern bullshit like mormonism and scientology, created by documented con artists. but oh no, yours is the ‘one true’ religion.

                all religions are false Except yours, right? cuz yours is somehow special?

        • kittenzrulz123
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          It also specifically should be mentioned how Judaism is a disease. People think Judaism is somehow “better” or “more tolerant”, as a Jewish person myself I can personally confirm that Judaism is just as capable of oppression and violent hatred (just look at Ben Gvir).

        • MetalMachine@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ok will you be consistent and mention the same of other ideologies that have wreaked havoc? By the way you associate things you have to acknowledge the death and destruction brought upon by secular and atheist states from colonialism to modern day imperialism.

          I’ll list some examples of states that caused a lot of death and destruction:

          • USSR a secular atheist state that killed millions and committed ethnic cleansing. (One ex. Is what they did in Kazakhstan)

          • USA and France and their invasion of Vietnam

          • All that was done by secular states in the colonial era

          • all that is being currently by secular states in the neo colonial era

          • US invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan.

          • Russian invasion of Ukraine

          I can keep going.

      • slartibartfast@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Because their religion literally teaches them to treat women like shit?

        And it’s not only them doing this. They all have shit women’s rights records.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          They all have shit women’s rights records.

          I’m sure this is a well-researched claim and not something you just made up, but let’s not get into that.

          And it’s not only them doing this.

          Literally no Muslim country in the world is as insane about oppressing women as Taliban Afghanistan. And that includes even the notorious ones like Iran. Nothing in Islamic beliefs or the behavior of Muslim countries resembles the ridiculousness of Taliban policies, and you should learn at least that before you shit on other people’s cultures.

        • sean@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Look at Rojava in Kurdistan (you did say “all” Muslims, no taking that back). It’s like saying the Christian religion is the reason the crusades were bad and not because they were violent men with horrible ideas. Innocent people worship innocently. I don’t like jihadists or Islamic nationalists or caliphates either, but I at least don’t attribute that to Muslims entirely, just the stupid ones. Most people don’t understand the difference between those who just want to be Muslim (look at Islamic people in Kurdistan and, yes, even Israel who has many religions living together relatively peacefully to the US) and those who want jihad and intifadas and Islam-directed oppression via the state. That’s because you believed the propaganda.

          There are religious nuts in Islam. They are jihadists. Hamas was the suicide bombers back in the 2000s. The taliban, ISIS, ISIL, Al-queda, the Houthis, Al-Shabaab, etc etc. They are all Islamic nationalists. It’s like seeing an American and assuming they’re transphobic just because MAGA is.

      • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        It is very clearly not only taliban. Extremist groups are, shocker, more extreme. Muslim religion and culture tends to treat muslim women as second class citizens. The more western the muslim country, the more they treat women like equals. Christians treat lbtq communty like shit and you wouldn’t say americans in 70s were extremist christian nutjobs as it was standard to be homophobic, part of the culture.

    • Flyswat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      She criticized their policies banning Afghan girls from education and work as “gender apartheid” and un-Islamic.

      Says right there it is opposite of what the religion teaches?!

      At least wait until there is an article that confirms your bias to spit your poison, dude.

    • hungryphrog
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I can assure you that misogyny is not a result of religion, religion is just used to excuse it.

    • MetalMachine@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ah yes, but other ideologies which have been destructive are not? I hope you’ll be consistent in pointing out the secular states of today continue to wreak havoc, death and destruction in the middle east and Africa. (Let’s not forget colonialism)

      And the secular atheist communist states of Russia and China, those didn’t commit ethnic cleansing and killed millions of people?

      I’ll just mention the destruction that the USSR brought to Kazakhstan that lingers to this day as an example.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s probably good they have basic religious differences or Republicans and the Taliban would have joined forces by now.

    • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Lore accurate abrahamic religions are peak incelcore. They remove the incel stuff to make it more appealing for the less hardcore fanbase.

      • Doorbook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Statistically speaking you are wrong. There are around a billion Muslim and a few thousands of Taliban.

        • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Statistically speaking do not look at womenstats maps and draw your own conclusions from countries frequenting the list of most anti women maps. Historically do not look at how christians have been treating women as well.

    • kittenzrulz123
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      They’re also both religious fundamentalists who have very little care for religious scripture but love using religious imagery as a tool of oppression, huh they really are alike.

  • Elaine Cortez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 months ago

    She isn’t wrong. Imagine not seeing half of the population as human, even though they carried you and everyone who has ever been born in the womb for 9 months and gave birth to you.

      • hungryphrog
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        JFC can you guys stop acting like your country is the worst place to ever exist? The situation for American women is nowhere as bad as it is for Afgan women. (yet)

        • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          JFC you don’t even live in the U.S. and you want to tell me that the type of people who would be happy to have American women in the same situation as Afghan women don’t exist here?

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 months ago

    “The Taliban declined to attend or comment.”

    Well yeah, they don’t think a person was talking.

    Really how is this news? The Taliban don’t think woman are people, and water is wet.

    We armed the wrong sex in Afghanistan…

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Capitalists are more efficient than both.

      They don’t see almost anyone as human.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        capitalism is what broke up gender norms; if a woman or a man presses a button for 8 hours what does a capitalist care?

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    If the US had not invaded Afghanistan and done such a shitjob the Taliban would have been overthrown by now. The Taliban was highly unpopular in 2001, but thanks to the US fucking everything up, they regained more land than they had otherwise by 2017 or so.

    • quant@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nothing’s certain with alternate scenarios. Perhaps Taliban would have eventually fallen, perhaps not. In the meanwhile, countless people will suffer under those goat fuckers.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The Taliban was highly unpopular in 2001,

      Fuck’s sake, the Northern Alliance was hard-pressed in 2001.

  • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Something about the “not human” phrasing is bothering me. I get what they’re trying to convey and I don’t dispute it, but it also feels inaccurate in a way that might lead us to miss important aspects of the situation.

    I’m sure if you asked an Afghan man how many people live in his home, he’d include women and children in his answer. So I don’t think they literally see women as a separate species.

    My gut feeling is more like Afghan men don’t generally believe in the concept of human rights, as opposed to separate sets of rights for men and women. Hell, they may not even believe in the Western concept of rights at all, and may think only in terms of things like religious obligations and cultural norms.

    I wonder if there’s a different phrasing we could use that has the same emotional impact but doesn’t suggest questionable conclusions about the world view of Afghans.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m sure if you asked an Afghan man how many people live in his home, he’d include women and children in his answer.

      I’m not so sure. I have zero basis to think it’s one way or another, but given all the oniony-but-actually-pure-facts headlines of these recent… months? I’m definitely not certain of it.

      • NosferatuZodd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        you shouldn’t base your thinking on western news which generally have an incentive to exaggerate everything related to Afghanistan and taliban.

        there’s a recent video from a non-muslim youtuber called Arab going to the taliban and vlogging his experience, from what I saw in his video the taliban aren’t as bad as the headlines suggest, I don’t really like the guy but the videos are good.

        the fact that they don’t give girls the same rights as boys are facts, but there’s more to it than just “girl less than boy” as the media portrays it, you need to understand the culture more before coming to conclusions like that the afghans think of women as subhuman.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Who is “you guys” and when did this arming and training happen?

        Not because I doubt it happened, but because it’s happened enough times with enough people that you need to be specific…

        • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It’s funny how every country is responsible for their actions, except America, cause you guys love to use the shaggy “it wasn’t me” defense towards every atrocity. “It want me, it was that American over there!”

          I think Rambo 3 was the one in Afghanistan, where Rambo joins the Taliban against the Russians, which was written that way to reflect the reality of Americans supporting and training the mujahideen of Afghanistan to oppose Russia. Those mujahideen are what turned into the taliban. America has a great history of training their future enemies

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s why I was asking which time.

            That Taliban rose up because the country was abandoned by the US after helping them see off the Soviet Union (and indeed being one of the catalysts that caused the Soviet Union to collapse). They were left with no infrastructure, and the Taliban stepped in with all the religious crazies in tow. And yeah, a lot of them were the mujahideen who were armed and trained by the US. They’re soldiers after all, and new regimes always need soldiers…

            The Russians later gave them some equipment and funding to fight the US when they later invaded, but nowhere near enough to actually fight back. It was going to take more than a couple of rocket launchers for that.

            Nobody ever gave a shit about the people there. Not the Taliban, not the US and not the Russians. Nobody is learning from it. You’ve got the exact same shit right now in Syria. They were rebels, then they were ISIS and Al-Qaeda, now they’re rebels again. All based on whether or not they’re attacking the old enemy.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            The two people you are replying to probably aren’t Americans. One posts in a Philippines com and the other from a .uk domain.

      • hungryphrog
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Do you think the person you’re replying to is somehow responsible for Taliban being in power?

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The word “chattel” sometimes gets used in conversations like this one, and I think we should stop doing that. It’s a confusing word that most people don’t understand, and is often confused with “cattle” ie cows. I mean just look at this definition:

    Chattel is a catch-all category of property associated with movable goods . At common law , chattel included all property other than real property . Examples include leases, animals, and money.

    TBH I think “livestock” is a better word all around. It means live animal property, which is accurate. People know what it means. And it has the right negative connotations, too: associating human beings with pigs and chickens, as if they’re on the same level.

  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    The dichotomy of the west running a literal concentration camp in Gaza and then taking the moral high ground on Afghanistan as if that is where human life is not valued is hillarious.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      Is this supposed to be some gotcha that justifies Israel’s genocide? Because what does Israel think of all of the women they are killing? And in Syria as well.

      • sean@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        No, but there’s nuance. Hamas is not worth supporting under any circumstance. I believe the Arabs and Muslims in Gaza and the West Bank should be able to live peacefully with all non Arabs and non Muslims in the region. Hamas does not want that. Hamas does not want peace with non Muslims, especially Jews.

          • sean@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Look at the other replies here, I posted sections of Hamas’ 2017 peace document which explicitly states their right to jihad and I got “yeah, jihad is fine” from someone. People defend Hamas here.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              What you got was a definition of jihad you disagree with. That is not the same thing.

              Jihad means “struggle” in Arabic. That has a broad range of interpretations. You deciding it must mean violence and only violence is the issue here.

              • sean@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                I know what it means, I understand it means to struggle. They use it in a violent context, it is not misinterpreted.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Please do demonstrate that, because the images you shared talk about armed resistance, which means that if they get attacked, they’re going to fight back. That’s as close as it gets to what you’re saying.

          • sean@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I don’t know, all I am saying is I do not support Hamas. You brought up Israel. Not sure why. I say look to the people in Kurdistan and Rojava. Those are governments who know how to help their people and protect Muslims and Jews and Christians and all other creeds. Jihadists Islamists do not believe in peace among nations and people.

            I’m an anarchist so I don’t care for the Israeli state or Palestinian state. States are inherently evil. We can see evidence of that on October 7th and beyond. Heck look at all of those intifadas and wars in the decades before October 7. Thus, look to Rojava.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              3 months ago

              You don’t know why I brought up Israel when you brought up Hamas? Because they’re fighting each other right now and Israel is using it as an excuse to cause a genocide which has done far more harm to Palestinian women than Hamas could have ever hoped to have done.

              Why did you bring up Hamas? And if you’re going to say, “because they’re Muslims,” why those Muslims?

              • sean@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Because Hamas wants to bring about a state that wants to genocide the Jews. Do you think they love the Jewish people?

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  That has nothing to do with the subject of this article whatsoever, which is about how the Taliban do not see women as human.

                  So how is that relevant?

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Hamas does not want peace with non Muslims, especially Jews.

          They do, though. Setting aside the fact that there are Christians living peacefully in Gaza, Hamas updated their charter in I think 2017 to reflect that. It has always been Israel rejecting peace deals, not Hamas.

    • forensic_potato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s so telling that in all your replies, you keep going back to how “Hamas is evil” while casually glossing over Israel’s role in this genocide and their constant crimes against humanity.

      Exploding buses from Hamas? No no no, inhuman. IDF forces dressing up as healthcare workers to go around unnoticed? Or Israel using civilians as human shields? bUt wHaT aBoUt hAmAs!?

      It’s also telling that some 20 days ago, in another post, you wrote

      If what Luigi did was terrorism then I support terrorism! Viva La terror!!!

      So you do understand violence as a legitimate method of protest/resistance. But you don’t understand it for Hamas or any other Muslim groups. Interesting…

      You Zionist trolls are all the same

      • sean@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Luigi killed an oppressor. Teenagers and old ladies that Hamas targets in their atracks are not oppressors. I’m not unaware of Israel, but Hamas does use human shields. This is a fact. Hamas cannot ever do this. It is inhumane. It shreds them of innocence. It makes removing Hamas impossible without innocent loss, and I hear you on wanting thay. If oct 7 resulted in only oligarchs and military leaders and politicians being targeted I’d be having a different discussion. If any intifada by Hamas had desired peace instead of total war, we’d have a different discussion. Hamas is as evil as Israel is, I agree.

        • forensic_potato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          So you’re really not even going to try anything else but “bUt hAmAs” in your replies, eh?

          Luigi killed an oppressor

          So did Hamas. But you keep denying them the same benefit of the doubt you give to this guy. I guess to you all those dead Palestinian people across almost 80+ years of occupation are not entitled to the same level of violence as a random guy who grew up with a wealthy family. You are really showing your true self with this replies.

          Teenagers and old ladies that Hamas targets in their atracks are not oppressors

          They are called casualties. And they are not directly oppressors, but they are without a doubt settlers of a colonial movement. They are in the line of fire because they went into a land that was not theirs.

          I’m not unaware of Israel, but Hamas does use human shields

          See my previous comment about your inability to reply without whatabout your way back to Hamas.

          If oct 7

          There we are. The classic Zionist propaganda coming through.

          If any intifada by Hamas had desired peace instead of total war

          It is not and it will never be a total war. A war would require at least 2 armies fighting against each other. This is a brutal and one sided genocide carried out by Israel. Period.

          Hamas is as evil as Israel is, I agree

          I don’t. The level of actions carried out by those 2 entities are not even remotely close. You just value some lives more than others and are trying your very best to condemn people that have been forced to endure a brutal ethnic cleansing campaing for the past 80+ years.

          I’ve seen your other replies as well. You are free to reply to me, but I’ve seen and said everything I needed to say to such trolly (read Zionist) behaviors

          • sean@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I’m sorry, but Hamas is not worth defending. I want peace for Gazans and everyone over there. I hate that Jews were given the fucking shaft because of Britain and the Ottoman Empire. There’s just too much history here to even call this simply Zionism, it is too reductionist.

            If Hamas dedicated themselves to disarming after and allowing all people to exist as a separate state from Islam, I’m all for it. Go Hamas if that’s what they want. Hell yeah, bring peace to your people, the Jews, the Christians, the atheists, etc. Allow them to vote in your society, allow them all to participate in government and practice their faith openly and without persecution.

            They do not want this. They want an Islamic state guided by Islamic faith to rule over the land of Judea/Israel/whatever. I do not desire this.

            • forensic_potato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              They do not want this

              They actually do. And they have said so multiple times.

              They want an Islamic state guided by Islamic faith to rule over the land of Judea/Israel/whatever

              Oh wow, so now you’re just going full Islamophobic again, uh? Let me know when you have a reply based on reality and not scary ideas you pulled out of thin air to further victimize the people enduring a genocide

              • sean@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Look at any of my other comments man, you will absolutely see I love my Muslim brothers and sisters. I even say I am okay with the spread of Islam and the Arab ethnicity, I just don’t support it via state or violent means (I don’t support in theocracy or ethnostates).

                I am against nationalists of all religions and political ideologies. Hamas is not exempt from this.

    • gravityowl@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      What do hamas think of women?

      What does Israel think of all the women they raped and killed then? And what does it think of children too, since they killed more children then any other country in 2024?

      Gtfo with your Zionist talking points

      • sean@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Where is my love for the Israeli state? I believe all peaceful people should be allowed to live, and there are lots of peaceful people in Gaza and the West Bank and Israel/Judea whatever you want to call the place. Nationalists over there are not peaceful.

        • gravityowl@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Are you aware that Hamas is the only reason people in Palestine have water and electricity?

          I’ll say it again, you’re just using Zionist talking points. And it takes a special kind of entitled person to tell a group of people being ethnically cleansed how they should act and how they should be “mOrE pEacEfUl” while being the victims of genocide

          • sean@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I think the people of Palestine should implement a state like Kurdistan and abandon their ties with Hamas. I support Hamas as much as I support any government who kills innocents in the name of jihad or any other “struggle”. Same with the Israeli government. I support them as much as I support Hamas. I support the people of Judea/Israel/whatever you want to call that hunk of land more than I support any of their governments.

              • sean@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                My goodness, I’m just trying to have a level head here? I have never supported Hamas, before or after October 7th. I very much remember their suicide bombings of busses. Do I excuse the IRA during the troubles? No. Fuck the IRA, but I don’t disagree with their plight. I agree that the Irish people deserve their land. Same with the people in Gaza and the West Bank. I hate the British empire as much as I hate the Israeli state. I hate Hamas as much as I hate the IRA.

            • gravityowl@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’ll post my (edited) comment again for all to see since the mods thought it was too uncivil in its previous version.

              I think the people of Palestine should implement a state like Kurdistan and abandon their ties with Hamas

              And how exactly are they supposed to do any of that while being bombed? Or while Israel doesn’t allow them to leave their internment areas? Or while dismissing any ceasefire proposal? What you’re saying is impossible because Israel doesn’t want it to happen. And I find gross how in all of this you keep putting the blame on Hamas instead of Israel, the one with the money, power and influence in all of this

              I support Hamas as much as I support any government who kills innocents in the name of jihad or any other “struggle”

              So to you being the victims of a genocide is just another “struggle”. Thanks for making clear to us the kind of person you are. You’re definitely not the victim of Zionist propaganda /s. But sarcasm aside, I’ll stop interacting with you now. There is only so much victim-blaming I can stomach in a day

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      A lot better than the Taliban, that’s for sure. The Taliban are a whole thing on their own when it comes to women’s rights.

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Headline/statement improvement note for your online discussing:

    “Taliban do not understand that women are human”, or “Taliban continue to refuse to acknowledge that women are human”.

    Don’t imply a possibility of correctness that isn’t there.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Rule 1 in this community includes, “title must match the article headline.” OP did as we request.