The sentencing procedure for our first criminally convicted felon President is due to begin at 9:30 AM Eastern/6:30 AM Pacific.

Let’s keep all the comments and posts wrangled here.

Live coverage should be… Oh, I’m just going to say “everywhere”. CNN, MSNBC, etc. etc. This is history so everyone should have it.

Edit As expected, Trump is appearing remotely.

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-hush-money-sentencing-01-10-25/index.html

Prosecution is asking for more time to read the probation report, apparently they haven’t read it yet.

Prosecution wants “Unconditional Discharge” then layed out every reason why it shouldn’t be unconditional. Trump showed no remorse, believes he’s above the law, that the court has no authority over him.

Defense is now making their presentation.

Trump is now speaking, underlining everything the Prosecution stated. Unrepentant, defiant, disrespectful.

Judge Merchan is addressing the court and CNN cuts away to cover California. LOL.

No live broadcasting the sentencing, but audio will be available after.

7:09 AM - Sentenced to Unconditional Discharge.

  • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Why the fuck did they even try him if there’s no consequence for a conviction? A waste of everyone’s time and money.

    Ice been incredibly furious about this all day. This fucking criminal flaunts his lawlessness in everyone’s faces and walks away without so much as a fucking fine! Fuck, Luigi had the right ide!

  • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I am so fucking angry about this. It’s just going to embolden the orange duck to commit more, worse crimes. He won’t ever leave the White House. This country is so fucked.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Judge wussied out; Lady Justice confirmed absent from the US.

    Buckle up, folks. We’re in for a wild ride.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Chris Smither - Happier Blue:

      https://youtu.be/lxTl72XVWso#t=40s

      Justice is a lady
      Blind, with a scale
      And a big letter-opener
      She’s been readin’ my mail
      I don’t know why this should shame me
      But it does, somehow
      I don’t care what you say
      She don’t look like a lady now
      I don’t care what you say
      She don’t look like a lady now

  • BadlyTimedLuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    13 hours ago

    You know, this makes me think of Luigi and how his sentencing will go. I assume: he will be sentenced to public execution, and be used as a martyr for the rich to send a message for us peasants,“this is what happens when you want to play hero”

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The only way they get the death penalty is convicting on 1st degree murder w/ terrorism and that’s looking like too high a bar. Too many prospective jurors going “Well, I wasn’t terrorized…”

      • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I’d love to believe you, but apparently, what’s legal matters less than a loud, wet fart into a diaper.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        It’ll be fucking hilarious if their overzealousness causes him to be found not guilty.

        This is an instance where jury nullification would be extremely just though I stand by my original statement - the optimal outcome for everyone after the murder would have been if no one was arrested and it remained unsolved.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          2nd degree murder looks like a lock to me, at the state level anyway. I haven’t looked at the federal charges yet.

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Yea. If that was the only charge I’d agree - but juries rarely (even though they’re supposed to) consider charges in isolation. Throwing Murder1 w/ terrorism on the pile makes it more likely he’s found innocent on all counts.

    • Dragomus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      13 hours ago

      “Hello, how nice of you to show up. Prosecution has proven you did a bad thing. The law says this bad thing is punishable, but since you think it is not proven we defer to your opinion and will not bother you with repercussions for your actions. Sorry to have wasted your time and have a nice day”

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Surely this means the party of law and order won’t support him, right?

        Right?

        …right?

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Across the street from my development is a retired cop who has a nursery/lawn care business staffed with Mexicans and had a giant, “I’m voting for the felon.”

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          It varies depending on the restriction.

          Gun ownership is a federal restriction, so he can’t legally own a gun in any state.

          New York restores voting rights to felons on release provided they re-register, Florida, where Trump lives, follows the convicting state rules.

          So, in theory, all he has to do is re-register and that is cleared.

          https://www.nycourts.gov/courthelp/criminal/publicOfficeConsequences.shtml

          “If you have been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor you may be barred from public office jobs, like a police officer, firefighter, court officer, or notary public. Public offices also include elected and appointed offices, like governor, judge, legislator, and local supervisors and commissioners. Police officers, corrections officers, parole and probation officers and district attorneys are also public offices. But, public office doesn’t always mean a job working for the city or state. If you think you may want a public office job, or you hold one now, it is important to find out if your misdemeanor or felony conviction will prevent you from having the job.”

          The office of the President is not restricted in that way. So while Trump may no longer be qualified for Dogcatcher, nothing prevents him from being President.

            • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              Bullshit. Florida allows exemptions to that law. Do you think Rhonda Santis won’t allow an exemption for him?

              Besides, his residence" is literally not allowed to be a residence, so he’s been committing voter proud for a long time.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Gun ownership is a federal restriction, so he can’t legally own a gun in any state.

            And yet he gets to control the nuclear football. WTactualF.

            • spongebue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              That could be a really interesting argument, actually. Strictly speaking, is there anything about “controlling a weapon” with the way the law is written? Or just about owning a gun? Or possession of a weapon? If someone, for example, handed a controller for an armed drone to a felon who could not have a gun, is that a loophole?

              Edit: thinking about this a little more and looking into it, the president is Commander in Chief of the military. The military does not generally allow felons, but there is a waiver for that. I think that if push came to shove, there could be a pathway there.

              • lordkuri@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Strictly speaking, is there anything about “controlling a weapon” with the way the law is written? Or just about owning a gun? Or possession of a weapon? If someone, for example, handed a controller for an armed drone to a felon who could not have a gun, is that a loophole?

                It depends… how much money and how many slavish cult followers do you have?

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah and they set the stage with the charges that were all not subject to mandatory sentencing. This is what they were looking for the entire time.

      • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        14 hours ago

        No, they set the stage when they took a zillion years to bring up charges in the first place. They could have brought these charges up in 2020 when he left office but they decided to sit on the case forever.

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Completely unserious legal system. It’s no wonder people try to hard cancel healthcare executives when the law is this powerless to stop evil. When the next vigilante murder happens, I want the country to remember that no one feels protected by the law when the law continually demonstrates itself to be powerless at stopping the ownership class.

    • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Someti,es, things get so bad that someone has to take direct action. When the law is flauted by those in power, what other recourse do we have?

  • Yodan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It’s difficult to accept any laws now. There’s no reason to follow any if the shining example of what this country has to offer is a multiple convicted rapist felon two time impeached orange orangutan who gets rewarded with being president. Again.

    You can’t simultaneously say “follow the rules” when the guy saying it is a rule breaker extraordinaire.

  • credo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    15 hours ago

    On Friday, Justice Juan M. Merchan sentenced Donald J. Trump to an unconditional discharge, a rare and lenient sentence in New York state courts that still cements Mr. Trump’s status as a felon before his inauguration.

    “You’ve been sentenced to… continue doing what you’ve been doing.”

  • zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Seems our institutions are promoting barbarism at this point. As Luigi put it: it’s just power games at this point.

  • bamboo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Trump is shuffling in his chair as prosecutor speaks

    Donald Trump is shuffling in his chair while prosecutor John Steinglass speaks. He appears to be leaning forward to look at the screen.

    Thank you CNN for the riveting updates

  • morgan423@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Listen really closely, and you’ll hear the gentle whisper of the slight disturbance of the air as he gets his gentle, barely-touch-skin wrist slapping.