• azi@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I mean it does seem kinda weird that running a heat engine to run a generator is more efficient than using a thermoelectric generator with no mechanical inbetween step.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      Thermodyanmics in practice is weird like that. You would think solid state peltiers would be more efficient than a machine. Solid state usually is in any other application. Just this once, no, pelts kinda suck. They’ve been around for two centuries now and nobody has made a significant breakthrough to improve them.

        • beastlykings@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          The problem that I see is that unless that magic semiconductor is 100% efficient, turning all the heat energy into electrical energy, then there’s gonna be some left over, and things are gonna get too hot too fast too furious. So you’ll need to cool the thing, or part of it, maybe similar to a TEG using the Seebeck or Peltier effect?

          I have a few of these kicking around somewhere. They work, just not super efficient, at all, with current technology.

          My point is I feel like no matter what you’re gonna need extra parts to cool the thing. Water pumps etc etc. Why not just use steam? 🤷‍♂️

          Edit: nice diagram though!

        • tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago
          • where does hotty water go. If hotty water always hot can we always use the same water

          • are there no reactors that convert particle interactions into photons and capture it with photovoltaics?