Summary

Meta updated its hate speech guidelines to allow users to accuse LGBTQ individuals of being mentally ill based on their gender identity or sexual orientation, citing “political and religious discourse” and “non-serious usage” of such language.

The changes also remove bans on hate speech targeting protected classes, including race, gender, and disability.

LGBTQ advocacy group GLAAD condemned the policy, accusing Meta of enabling anti-LGBTQ hate for profit.

These updates are part of broader moderation changes as Meta aligns itself with Donald Trump’s administration.

  • WhatSay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Who still uses Facebook? I guess those who appreciate these policy changes.

    X had an outward migration, maybe it’s time for a Facebook/Instagram alternative.

  • Jessica
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    “We do allow allegations of mental illness or abnormality when based on gender or sexual orientation, given political and religious discourse about transgenderism and homosexuality and common non-serious usage of words like ‘weird,’” the revised company guidelines read.

    Abhorrent. Immoral. Evil.

    These are the “insults” that I’d prefer to use to describe Facebook. This is the direction of the US. This is what people want. They want to be able to label people like me as “mentally ill”.

    Fuck Facebook. I hope Zuckerberg gets his [not going to get banned for promoting violence, but what about the implication?]

    • Catoblepas
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Transgenderism” immediately has me like

      🚨🚩🚨🚩

      Also, “non-serious usage of words like weird” means using it seriously against politicians could be rule violating, while calling someone mentally ill for being gay wouldn’t. 🙃

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        When you suggest a personal identity is some sort of ideology or political movement, you have shown all of your cards.

      • Jessica
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        2 days ago

        “Transgenderism” immediately has me like

        Yup, sure does. The biggest social network is now a safe haven for hate speech.

  • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    FB is going to die eventually. This expedites it. Its audience is aging, not getting younger. Add hate speech, and you’ll just drive people off it further.

    I use FB for my birthday and connecting with family. I can find other platforms. Thanks.

    • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It had hate speech already, which already didn’t “go against community policies” (in spite of using well known codes to tell trans people to k*** themselves), this will just make it all the more blatant

      (Just to be clear, I’m not disagreeing with you, I’m agreeing and adding context, just in case my intention wasn’t obvious… Text and nuance ;) )

  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Gross, corporate social media platforms have been circling the nazi bar drain for a while, it’s just becoming explicit now.

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Ngl did not except a social media platform to do this