• Blackout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    6 days ago

    All laws protecting the people’s interests are now banned. Don’t like it? Well become a billionaire and maybe the supreme Court will care

    • katy ✨
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      6 days ago

      otoh:

      Mike Masnick @mmasnick.bsky.social‬

      I mean, this is a terrible (if unsurprising) decision, but I’m left wondering how Brendan Carr is going to still try to claim regulatory authority over social media companies…

      There is no possible consistency between “ISPs can throttle and block, but edge services cannot…” ‪nilay patel‬ ‪@reckless.bsky.social‬

      2h

      Sixth Circuit decision striking down net neutrality doesn’t even remotely pass the sniff test lol www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf

      January 2, 2025 at 3:11 PM

      https://bsky.app/profile/mmasnick.bsky.social/post/3lerv476tes22

        • Bumblefumble@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          6 days ago

          Trump wants to weaponise the FCC to go against social media companies who “ban free speech” or whatever, just like Elon complained about before buying Twitter, and like all other right wingers are so mad about. But if the FCC doesn’t have any authority to regulate ISPs, why should it have authority to regulate social media companies. Not that the courts seem to care about precedent anymore, but that’s the silver lining they are looking for.

          • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Like trying to pass gun control with a political party vocally advocating for the purge? Or after a insurrection? or after police brutality across the nation captured on high definition cameras during a protest about police brutality?

            www.socialistRA.org