• wick@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    They do have the resources, they also have the expectation they won’t need to waste them on dumb shit MS breaks.

    Ubisoft IS the consumer of MS products. But I guess your sympathies for consumers is only skin deep.

    • wholookshere
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Companies aren’t people. So yes, my limit is “skin deep”.

      (Not the person you replied to).

      • wick@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        What a profound observation. Paperwork isn’t flesh. Amazing. What’s your point?

        • wholookshere
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          That yes, it doesn’t bother me that Ubisoft is a consumer of Microsoft.

          If Ubisoft doesn’t update their product, they should be reviews negatively. If they don’t like it they should de list it so people don’t pay money for a broken product.

          • wick@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Delist the game that’s been out since 2017 and already bought by 10 million people! Genius! The update point has already been clowned on by plenty of others in the thread, so I won’t relitigate that. But wow dude, delisting is so smart. Like, if 10 million people with the game can’t access what they paid for that’s way better for consumers.