Suppose you have a fediverse admin, perhaps one of the several who are oppressive, and they are roaming around somewhere like Twitter or Reddit. One day they spot someone on there they don’t like, maybe someone they know from the fediverse or maybe not, and they give the person a hard time. Are we allowed to talk about those activities, especially considering the barrier is already crossed the other way?
I think you might be the drama at that point.
You say that like he’s me or that either of us have been doing as you say just because it’s easy to attribute things to others without proof. None of that is true, heck your sources claim I’ve been banned from this place out of spite, which is verifiably false.
The modlog, which anyone can access, shows that you’ve been repeatedly banned and have had your comments removed for “trolling” across different instances and communities. I also provided links showing that you’ve lied about not having an alt account on Reddit even though you admitted you own sockpuppet accounts. Then you gaslight people about how they must be misinterpreting what is clear as day.
Do you think it’s a good look when you lie through your teeth like this in front of people, who can click on those links and see that you’re lying?
You don’t know how a place works if you are only going to undermine the difference between a community ban and a total ban out of spite. You also misunderstand me if I’ve said anything you claim I am. You and your co-targeters have been told many times you don’t speak for what others mean when they say or do something, especially when the main defense to someone actually thinking critically about everything is to go after them too.
To those who are reading this thread, this is exactly what I mean when I point out that this person gaslights and tries to manipulate their way out of any accountability whatsoever. They’ll try and avoid accountability by saying “you can’t speak for my intentions” like a broken record, even though their intentions are clear as day. You aren’t being targeted, people are noticing and pointing out that you’re a troll, which is why you got perma-banned from Bulbagarden after administrators discovered concerning off-site conduct. .
This is literally your modus operandi. You troll by sticking up for a Nazi (and then you lock the post because people called you out on it), make creepy comments towards minors, call trans people slurs in private and telling them to go shoot up schools and when people notice this you gaslight by saying “it’s fake” “you can’t read my intentions” “it’s slander” or “you’re misinterpreting everything” to try and paint yourself as some poor victim. Sometimes you resort to a type of trolling known as sealioning which is you repeatedly asking for evidence even if someone just provided links to things you’ve said and done. You have been doing this for the last five years.
You act like insincere apologies excuse everything, ignoring the fact that you’re still trolling to this day.
Because you can’t speak for another’s intentions. And this (along with me being banned from there; that’s only one half of their domain) is reiterated as many times as it has been for the very reason that it has to be. It’s not anyone acting like a “broken record” when it’s in response to something just as repetitive. This was also my point when talking about Elon Musk who you refer to as a Nazi, as well as the things after that you accuse me of, with the slur against trans people having been apologized for two years ago (with the person I said it to being on good terms with me still) because I didn’t know the name of a fictional race from One Piece could ever be a slur.
You forgot to mention to the people here that you also told them to go and do what the Nashville school shooter (who was trans) did . Apologizing after others, by your own admission, “convinced” you to apologize isn’t that convincing. Is comparing trans people to school shooters also something you got from One Piece? Apologizing and writing about how you’re a “trans ally” who has “trans family members” doesn’t make you any less of a transphobe. Many racists use the excuse of “I’m not racist, I have black friends”. The Discord chat leak was you showing your true self.
Does it involve you (and as such would violate rule 1)?
I believe following someone outside of here officially qualifies as Doxxing.
But doxing is exposing private information, so if their account is public it’s stalking at worst and that’s stretching it.
Are you seriously using the defense “it’s stalking at worst”?
Yeah, that’s not going to stand up in court
Nobody’s talking about defenses in court here but basic definitions.
My county has my name publicly attached to my address, but it doesn’t mean I want people to tell folks (who knows my name) my address!
I don’t follow. OP is talking about referencing online comments on a public forum and not airing someone’s personal details like their home address that could endanger them. My point is that referencing those conversations is simply not doxing when it’s all publicly available. Can you explain what you mean while taking into account the rest of the thread?
I’m comparing telling people who know my name my address which is technically “publicly available” to telling people who know my Lemmy username my other usernames which are technically publicly available. It’s a shitty thing to do.
I am not comparing giving people someone’s address who only knows my Lemmy username (but that would still be shitty, just not related to anything being discussed).
I don’t see a problem if it relates in a way to the fediverse, and it’s not doxxing someone (ie: the usernames are identical or similar enough, and the behavior makes it obvious it’s the same person behind both accounts).
If it’s on twitter or reddit, it’s not really fedi drama.
I think you are the drama.
You can talk about whatever you want here, there even was even a case of an admin from another instance going nuts and putting up links to CSAM “as proof” and they allowed it to remain up.
