And apparently, also when you think that ‘They’ is a perfectly serviceable gender-neutral singular pronoun, but are willing to use other pronouns if asked to.

EDIT: Other removable offenses on Blahaj now include questioning mod/admin decisions and quoting the modlog as a reason why you’re leaving.

  • spujb@lemmy.cafeEnglish
    2·
    11 days ago

    So you acknowledge that you left the community simply because the Admin said to report and block disengage suspected trolling rather than engaging in harrassment? That’s so sad :(

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      4·
      11 days ago

      So you acknowledge that you left the community simply because the Admin said to report and block suspected trolling rather than engaging in harrassment? That’s so sad :(

      No, not even close to what was said, and that’s very much the response I expected after seeing your behavior in this argument. There’s nothing even vaguely resembling that in the comment you’re supposedly responding to. As usual, you ignore the evidence and arguments presented and make shit up.

      Although I suppose I should thank you, since this reply clarifies that it’s not incompetence, but explicitly bad faith you’re arguing in.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeEnglish
        2·
        11 days ago

        edit: i think i misunderstood pug’s comment so putting my response behind a spoiler till i get confirmation sorry for any confusion

        click to open

        No, not even close to what was said

        So, if I show you evidence that that was said, you would consider amending your understanding?

        promise?

        promise ?

        “Trolls, spammers, twitter users, it doesn’t matter who they are, your options are to respect their pronouns, or to not engage with them. […] This isn’t a free reign for trolls and spammers. The rules still apply.“ ada in the body text of the c/main post

        its pretty close to what i said. reporting and/or blocking are indeed prominent tools in “not engaging with them,” i will apologize for using non-specific language there. i’ll edit my comment.

        my statement ammended: she said “do not engage if you can’t not do validity discourse or misgender” which is such a tiny ask, and yet for some reason that’s a end-all situation for you

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
          2·
          11 days ago

          So, if I show you evidence that that was said, you would consider amending your understanding?

          Not even close to what was said in my argument, as the next sentence very clearly indicates

          There’s nothing even vaguely resembling that in the comment you’re supposedly responding to.

          An utterly moronic attempt.

          • spujb@lemmy.cafeEnglish
            2·
            11 days ago

            No, not even close to what was said

            Oh can you clear up the grammar here? I think we’re talking past each other—let me course correct. Did you mean “what I said” or “what Ada said?” (or another acting party maybe?) I admit if I got the wrong meaning from that sentence my response doesn’t make sense, and in that case my apologies!