• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I don’t get it… just how many people have to even interact with trans athletes IRL? Or have some “scare” with a trans person in a bathroom? Or be forced to watch something ‘woke’ or whatever. Who TF loses sleep over this?

    Meanwhile, this is why we’re miserable:

    And this is one of many reasons we will get even more miserable (as an increasingly large part of the US budget will be interest… not even going to think about climate here, or how much steeper that line is now):

    And we just obliterated the two groups who wanted to do something about it (liberal socialists and debt hawks) and elected both of their polar opposites all in one package who openly swore to make those issues significantly worse.

    …I know Lemmy will hate this, but maybe the Democrats need to “adopt” and reform the old fiscal conservatives in the GoP. Basically become this “tax the rich” party, where taxing the living shit out of billionaires and saving your children is literally the party creed instead of a hollow neoliberal byline, but balancing the budget and trying to reduce spending attracts entities that would traditionally skew Republican.

    There is obviously public sentiment for this, and the tremendous irony is Trump is the only one sucessfully tapping it.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 days ago

      The thing that gets me is if we did universal health and education we’d actually save money. To be honest though, the debt hawks didn’t seem like they were working in good faith. Every time they got power they spent worse than the Democrats. And they constantly trashed plans to make government more efficient in favor of handouts to corporations.

      In fact the only people who seem to be operating in good faith on fiscal conservatism are the progressives and socialists.

      • SoleInvictus
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 days ago

        Agreed, the debt hawks were just there to gather votes from fiscal conservatives. Then they privatized programs and cut taxes for the wealthy, claiming this would help the government reduce debt, knowing the average American wasn’t really paying attention to the results.

        So much of American politics is pure theatrical bullshit and politicians get away with ridiculous behavior because the American people are, as a whole, mind bogglingly stupid.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          So much of American politics is pure theatrical bullshit and politicians get away with ridiculous behavior because the American people are, as a whole, mind bogglingly stupid.

          TBH one of the stupidest things politicians believe is that earnest, honest campaigning would win in an age of social media bubbles and extremely complex issues.

          Trump screws up so much in his campaigns, and I find it amusing that everyone is scratching their heads trying to figure out how this helped him… It didn’t. He won in spite of beint a terrible candidate running a shitstorm campaign because he’s populist, and he didn’t campaign like its the 1950s.

          You want to win, you have to lie through your teeth and pander enough to make an influencer blush, and Democrats are going to keep losing till they figure that out.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        No one is operating in good faith on fiscal conservatism anymore, especially not the progressives/socialists. That’s their whole issue… the social programs come first.

        There have absolutely been debt hawk voices in congress saying good things, but they have been increasingly drowned out over time… which is unsurprising, as voters apparently don’t care about it anymore. And just forcing nationalized healthcare is not going to work overnight either. It would stop things from racing away, sure, but the whole system needs to be squeezed and fixed without breaking it or it will just make things worse.

        We need a sustainability party.

        But not branded as that of course. They need a campaign so dirty it would make Trump and clickbait influencers blush.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Those social programs operate more efficiently which saves us money and they want to actually tax the wealthy which increases tax receipts. Many of them would also cut military spending, the one area we have broad discretion in cutting.

          Wealth redistribution programs like minimum wage raises, chained pay, and monopoly busting mean money isn’t sucked into the top 1 percent where it disappears either. Broad tax bases provide far more revenue to fix debt issues than the trickle down the entire rest of the political system is enamored with.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Wealth redistribution programs are great and urgently needed. Medicine needs to be largely socialized. But doing that is not going to fix it overnight… all the inefficiencies and leeches stuck to the system will get worse unless they are progressively, individually addressed.

            And cutting military only goes so far.

            I am trying to reiterate that these social programs are not a magic bullet, and a little bit of that deficit hawk gutting and even “breaking” things is kinda needed too, especially in places neither party will like. Realistically, gutting the military would not cover it either.

            Axios broke this down much better than I could: https://www.axios.com/2024/11/16/elon-musk-trump-department-government-efficiency

            Social Security: This popular program eats up 20-25% of total federal spending. It supports retirees, disabled individuals, and survivors. Trump has promised to never cut it. In fact, he wants to eliminate taxes on benefits, which would increase the deficit.

            Health care: Think Medicare (for seniors) and Medicaid (for low-income individuals). This is another 25% of the budget. Trump has promised to protect Medicare and a lot of his working-class base benefits from these programs.

            Defense: The Defense Department and related military spending constitute about 13-15% of the federal budget. Republicans typically want more defense spending, not less. And it’s hard to see the shift to space-based warfare costing less.

            Interest on the national debt: This one sucks the most for America because you get nothing in return. Interest payments are growing rapidly, now around 8-10% of federal spending. The only way to save money here is to radically cut the debt. Trump’s agenda does the opposite.

            Safety-net programs: Programs like food benefits (SNAP), unemployment insurance and housing assistance collectively make up about 10%. Trump won with the support of people who get these benefits, so cuts could be a hard sell.

            Case in point: The expense for entitlement programs goes almost entirely to the benefits themselves, not any administrative bloat involved in issuing checks. For example, the administrative cost of Social Security is only about 0.5% of outlays, $7.2 billion last year, Neil Irwin points out.

            So even if somehow you magically cut that in half, you’ve only cut $3.6 billion in spending — trivial in the context of the federal budget.

            The article points out the futility of doge, but it also applies to “finding” money for massive increases of these programs.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Nothing is going to fix it overnight. Except maybe letting the IRS off the leash. If that’s your criteria then we’re already done.

    • Botzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      At least the Republicans will finally have to accept that they’re worse for the deficit and national debt, right?

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Clearly not. Trump campaigned on breaking a broken government open. The doge department and such carries a lot of waste reduction branding, TBH some of it may be a good idea. But fundamentally, there is just no way to balance the budget without, well, taxing the living shit out of billionares and massive stock trades, instead of giving them even more breaks. Even Musk’s dream of gutting research, medicaid and such is just not going to counter it.

        Part of this is self inflicted by Democrats too. They pushed neoliberalism everywhere. Surprise surprise, that turned large swathes of the world into billionaire tax havens, and now that’s a massive problem unless they can get others to cooperate… again, another very weak point for Trump.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    Them damn pesky trans girls, man. They keep fucking up our economy and way of life. I can’t even afford my groceries anymore. Them damn trans girls, man.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    These are just some of the sacrifices we all need to make to be sure the most morally corrupt person in all of politics protects our good old fashion family values.

    • SoleInvictus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Offer our trans people on the altar of “family values” for our Lord Beaver Cleaver demands a blood sacrifice.