• nialv7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 hours ago

    not the first time capitalism asks you for money to solve problems capitalism created…

  • Eiri@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    20 hours ago

    It’s one or the other. If you pay YouTube for Premium and don’t get any ads, advertisers don’t pay for your ad impression.

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      wish there was an option for “pay the platform the few cents the ads make” instead of me paying the platform a wild and ever increasing amount of money

      Tbh I feel like they should take a ~30% cut from the creator tips feature and add that to a “ad balance” which would remove ads and subtract the few cents they would’ve got from the ad. That way YouTube gets paid, the consumer doesn’t get ads, and the creator gets encouraged to make good content.

  • Blue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    22 hours ago

    This can’t seriously be surprising for anybody, youtube with its on-demand unlimited video storage and streaming has to be one of the biggest money sinks on the internet.

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      We all bought a free subscription to it for life with our data that they stole before we even had a sense of it being a problem.

  • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    I scrape videos off of YouTube using Pinchflat which dumps them into a folder, predownloaded for me, which I then have connected to a Jellyfin server that splits each channel up as an individual series, ads and bumpers stripped entirely, and it automatically downloads videos as they release.

    Paying sounded too involved. Make a google account, etc…

    Who has the time?

  • Gutek8134@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Ever heard of Elsevier? You pay them for the privilege of posting your article, and then they charge other people for the privilege of accessing it.

  • Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d pay YouTube if it were $5/month instead of $15.

    In fact, a couple of my favorite YouTube creators are on nebula.tv and I pay them $30/year.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Is a treadmill show just something you watch while you’re on the treadmill?

        • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          honestly i’m not sure lol. I prefer shows I don’t have to pay too much attention to but i always end up watching real life lore/geopolitic/news videos and get really wrapped up in them. I’ll probably classify them as shows that i watch in my own and not with my fiance.

          • Obi@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Right I meant more the expression itself, first time I see it I think.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d pay YouTube if it were $5/month instead of $15.

      It’s less than 5/month on the family plan IF you have 4 other people you’d like to share with

      The family plan is the only reason I pay for premium lol.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I’d gladly pay €15 a month if they guaranteed not to track me on the internet.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I pay $14CAD for Crunchyroll and I don’t even use it that much. I use hours and hours of Youtube content pretty much every day. I also had Nebula but need to get that sorted again now that they aren’t with Curiosity Stream.

      People will pay for a lot of stuff but ask them to pay for Youtube and they will lose their damn minds.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        YouTube doesn’t even produce their own content. I’d rather get it somewhere else, if creators offer that option.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Sure, but considering just how much they need to store and serve to viewers at the highest speed I kinda get it. Look if it was $20CAD a month I’d definitely reconsider, and if they start putting ads in anyway I’ll cancel because I’m not paying to still see that shit, but for now it’s fine.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I wish Nebula had official support for third party clients.

      What I really want is a more decentralized approach. Hosting video is expensive so it would be idea if it could be offloaded to smaller community devices instead of huge server farms.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      They would lose money with every user if this was the case, UNLESS they stopped paying creators entirely

    • Wisely@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Nebula confuses me, to the point I wonder if I use the app completely differently or the owners post online everywhere how great they are.

      I tried it several years ago and it seemed like there wasn’t much content. Figured it was too new. I tried it again a couple months ago and there was still the same lack of content.

      A lot of topics have no videos at all. The ones that do have maybe one of two creators who make all the videos on that subject.

      I could not figure out a way to unsubscribe, the only option was to delete account. Checking every option and setting in both the app and online. Customer service didn’t respond until two months later.

  • hihi24522@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The bourgeoisie (parasites) pay the bourgeoisie (parasites) to make their service worse in an attempt to extract more capital from you. You give the bourgeoisie capital… to stop them from making their service worse in order to take your capital?

    This is a lose lose for you and a win win for corpo scum. Use an Adblock, take to the seven seas, use platforms that are decentralized. Then it’s a win win for you and, added bonus, it’s typically parasite free.

  • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    21 hours ago

    You forgot the part where they pay the video creator 50% of the money and use the other 50% to run one of the most computationally expensive and complex services on the internet.

    • Michal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I don’t know about computationaly expensive. Once video is processed, it’s mostly just a fancy CDN.

      • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        I was sort of lumping storage and compute costs together as “compute” but compute itself is probably astronomical too.

        Even if it was just a CDN, a cdn at that scale streaming that much content simultaneously would require a huge amount of compute just to handle the streaming request traffic.

        There’s also the recommendation algorithm which is powered by ai and takes a shit ton of parameters, at that scale that would be a massive computational task in and of itself.

        Even video processing they probably send it through a couple Ai pipelines to add subtitles, make sure it’s not porn, check if your discussing topics with high misinformation so it can put that Wikipedia link below the video, etc.

        All that plus probably another million other little problems that comes with running a service at that scale.

      • Eiri@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Wouldn’t serving video and bandwidth concerns count as complexity?

  • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    The thing with advertising is that the advertisers make more money in product sales from people who watched ads than they spend telling YT to push their ads. That’s just how the advertising business works.

    In other words, either the viewers pay youtube not to show ads, or the viewers pay the advertisers to pay youtube (in a roundabout way).

    So it’s just you paying in both cases, unless you use an adblocker :)

    PSA: firefox + ublock origin blocks youtube ads even on mobile (on android at least)

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    So you’re saying the audience for the ads have the people who are willing to pay for stuff, the very people the advertisers are paying to reach, removed from it.

    I wonder how much longer this will go before the advertisers catch on to that.