• IDrawPoorly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    His argument is still applicable as if it were posted today.

    Yours that it’s ragebait implies (because ragebait implies that it’s based off a lie or something that no longer applies) doesn’t. It’s not “still” and wasn’t.

    • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Rage bait doesn’t imply it’s a lie, it’s attempting to get others to engage by inciting anger. Not to mention that even if it did imply a lie, why did they blur the dates out? To make you think this was a recent change? Still falls in line with your definition of rage bait misleading you. It definitely was and still is rage bait.