• azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    146
    ·
    26 days ago

    I was there Gandalf…

    Before that date their algorithm was soft-locked to around 5k upvotes. If a post was extremely, massively popular it would climb to maybe a bit over 10k but that was insane. There was clearly a logarithmic scaling effect that kicked in after a few thousand upvotes. Not entirely sure why, perhaps to prevent the super-popular stuff from ballooning in some kind of horrible feedback loop.

    The change was to uncap the vote counts. One day posts just kept climbing well beyond the 5k mark. Now what they also did was recalculate old posts in order not to fuck up the /top rankings. Kinda. Took a while and I’m not sure they got to every post.

    I don’t know or care if reddit does vote manipulation, but this ain’t proof and I don’t see how it is unbelievable that a website with tens of millions MOA would occasionally have a post with 100k+ upvotes.

    • Wistful@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      26 days ago

      Yeah, OP’s post is misleading. Back then, they announced that they will make that change in how votes are displayed.
      So they literally did the opposite of what OP is claiming, they started showing real numbers. Those numbers don’t seem unrealistic at all to me. Reddit is one of the most popular websites, and the nature of the frontpage will just mean that posts that reach the top will have huge amount of votes.

      I don’t know why are we still talking about reddit here. I’m pretty sure everyone who is here, already hates it.

      • laverabe@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        This recalculation happened shortly after reddit went closed source. I don’t think we should trust their word that they had all of a sudden ‘fixed’ the problem, whose fix just so happened to really drive their stock value.

        It’s not misleading, it’s the reality of what happened. Their public post was PR justification. It was about that point on that every decision they made was for $ and not for transparency.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        26 days ago

        I use Reddit and Lemmy and I’m pretty sure I’m not alone. I don’t really understand people who treat them as mutually exclusive.

    • laverabe@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      I figured most people here knew about it, but also just as many probably forgot about it, at least deep in the memory banks. ;)

      • pwnicholson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        26 days ago

        Your explanation says that a post with 100k actually has 20k. What this guy is saying is that it does actually have 100k.

        • laverabe@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          26 days ago

          It’s impossible really to say. This was their official code citation:

          Over the past few months, we have carefully recomputed historical votes on posts and comments to remove outdated, unnecessary rules.

          I mean on the face of it, maybe they were telling the truth?

          But they are a for profit corporation, and that year forward was when the enshittification really began. I guess I just have little reason to believe that they didn’t just alter the algorithm to make it look like there was more engagement than there was.

    • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      26 days ago

      Was gonna say, I explicitly recalled it being the removal of the scaling algo, so if anything the current vote counts (this has possibly changed since that 2016 adjustment) are more accurate. Reddit has a massive userbase, and posts in default subs are naturally going to get upvoted substantially. There’s no real viral algorithm to reddit, you just see things that are upvoted.

    • ABCDE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      don’t know or care if reddit does vote manipulation

      It does, showing random vote numbers on posts when you refresh.

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    26 days ago

    “Completely” made up is a bit hyperbole. They’re not random, they are usually in some way indicative of the number of upvotes/downvotes a post is getting.

    The reality is that any naive upvote system can be gamed. The more popular Lemmy gets, the more lucrative it will be to systematically manipulate which posts/comments are promoted and which get buried. And a naive voting system that just reflects the raw number of up/down votes is trivial to manipulate. It’s harder than a signal in the noise issue, it’s more of a signal in a deliberately crafted manipulated signal issue.

    If Lemmy gets more popular, it’s only a matter of time before it’s forced to come up with alternative methods for deriving post sentiment.

  • mesamune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    26 days ago

    Yep I remember. Its an estimate…kinda. there were many reasons given but at the time it felt bad. Like they were trying to hide the counts…which I still think they do.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      I think the given reason was to prevent vote manipulation by fuzzing the counts or something like that, but I always to took it as the admins and supermods cherry pick which posts they want to promote and alter the counts, so basically pushing certain messages and politicking.

  • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    26 days ago

    That site is crappy. I never look at all and rarely look at popular. I glance at my own feed but rarely get to a second page.

    It’s gross if you look at all or popular and narrow it down to an hour and look at the bots going hog wild

  • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    26 days ago

    What’s a reddit? Is it like those ice boxes that people used before refrigerators?

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    I noticed reddit have constant post-election copium. Like “It’s not over, Fani Willis case is unpardonable” Wtf lol. So silly. Its like those “Umm achtually, trump will be president on March 4.” when Biden won. Ridiculous copium. I feel like reddit algorithm is trying to push for a lib Jan 6 so that trump will have an excuse to invoke insurrection act (not like he wont try regardless, but with a lib Jan 6, there will be no resistance from the military to carry out his orders).