• Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The goal was to placate workers enough to preserve the power structure.

    Nice revisionism.

    There wasn’t any chance of a massive class struggle like the USSR happening. There was more of a chance that the richest would have kicked FDR out and put in their own junta. That attempt only failed because Smedley Butler wasn’t having any.

    I was lucky enough to meet some old school Communists who’d been in the Spanish Civil War. They would have laughed at the idea that the US was on the verge of a Socialist takeover in the 1930s.

    • darthelmet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It certainly wasn’t as extreme or successful as the soviet union, but there was a lot of unionization going on during the industrial revolution that was more radical than the tamer bargaining unions we see in the post-war era. And then the depression happened and things got really bad. It’s not hard to see how elites would have looked out at what was happening in the world, looked at the bad economic situation at home, and concluded that something had to be done.

      FDR even said that they were trying to reform capitalism to save it.

      https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Wikiquote:Transwiki/American_history_quotes_New_Deal

      1933 “It was this administration which saved the system of private profit and free enterprise after it had been dragged to the brink of ruin.” President Roosevelt, on how his emergency actions in 1933 prevented a revolution and saved capitalism.