• tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      In the US, not really. Even if the phone itself was cheap, the plans were high. We moved my last year of highschool and my mom got a phone for me to keep in the car. It was only to call 911 for emergencies because the cost per minute was crazy.

      • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        in the EU short messages were still free of any charge at that time. nokia started booming. life was good in the EU and plans were affordable.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      No, they weren’t particularly cheap. And they weren’t anywhere nearly as reliable connectionwise (functionwise they were way more reliable to be honest), and the expectation to always be near it wasn’t anywhere near it is today.

    • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Devices were getting cheaper, not quite to mass adoption but getting there, however service wasn’t nearly universal like it is today. There were whole towns and even some suburbs that didn’t have coverage yet. It wasn’t until the introduction of 3G (around like 2006, if memory serves) that phones got cheap and service became blanket for most people.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yea I didn’t get a cell phone until like 2004/5 and I only had coverage for like half the places I spent time at in my town. All my friends lived out in the country so I was unreachable most of the time until several years later.