You must log in or register to comment.
I don’t understand why these passively cooling roofs aren’t being used EVERYWHERE seems like an absolute no brainer.
I don’t know what passive cooling roofs you mean, but I guess its because its much harder to convince people to swap their roofs. Of course you can support The usage of them, but you won’t convince people to switch their old roof for a new one.
Excellent news! Well done Paris!
Anne Hidalgo is a legendary Mayor
“Drop speed limits”?
The city’s new climate plan promises to drop speed limits, repurpose traffic lanes, remove 60,000 parking spots and create urban “oases” to combat extreme heat.
I don’t think that word means what the journalist think it means. Dropping means abolishing the speed limit in this case, drive as fast as you like. Instead Paris is actually lowering Speed Limits on the Ring Road down to 50km/h.
I agree with you, had to read it twice to make sure they don’t mean to remove speed limits.
After a quick search I found a different article from BBC about a speed limit that is dropped from 30 mph to 20 mph. TIL.
Eh. People sometimes using “dropping” to be synonymous with “lowering.” I got what they meant.
Just as an example off the top of my head, when describing the temperature, a person might say “the temperature dropped by 10 degrees” or “to 20 degrees.”
Yeah okay, but context matters in this case.
Temperature dropped? Fine.
A case was dropped? Its no longer applicable.
A Speed limit was dropped? Its no longer applicable.
My Sandwich got dropped in the trashbin? You threw my Sandwich Away!? MY SANDWICH? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYFevK2lDJI
No way. When something numerical is “dropped” it usually means lowered. Especially in the form “drop numerical value”, as was this case.
There is no numeric value in that teaser text though. “[…] promises to drop speed limits”
Please stop, you’re dropping our collective IQ.
Isn’t it funny to come late and still feel the need to pile on?
Yes
Because speed limits are usually given in essays?
They are numerical values even if not explicitly stated here because the details are not that important.
because the details are not that important.
then why are the 60.000 parking spots mentioned? Why not just parking spots?
Because the parking spot reduxtion is one number. You surely don’t expect them to list all the current speed limits (probably quite a few different ones throuout the city) and the different reductions of those.
Sure. But the way I look at language is “if you can understand it, it’s right.”
If you understood what they meant enough to be pedantic about it, it was probably a fine use of the word.
I only understood because I read the article afterwards as I was confused by that teaser text.
Fair enough.
I’d say your sandwitch is no longer applicable.
Oh yeah that’s a really bad ambiguity to end up in an article.
Meanwhile Canada is removing bike lanes for more car support, and the US elected a deeply anti-environment party.
Yeah. Whatever. We already know only French taxes and citizens abuse will save the world. Keep up the good work everywhere else, we’re here.
Obviously 1. Sarcasm doesn’t read well on the internet and 2. You guys don’t know paris’ mayor eagerness and lust for self rewarding objectives (like being listed in the top 100 personalities…) You’re right to downvote, my bad. The world needs help, probably not with that kind of hypocritical intensions, but anyway…
Oh so since no single measure will be sufficient no reason for any measures to be taken?
Abuse? Because the Paris mayor actually thinks about the future and doesn’t want her citizens to die?
Removed by mod
