This happened in Toronto on October 24th

  • DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Why isn’t there a manual mechanism for the door? Why didn’t the passengers use an emergency glass hammer? Why isn’t there an emergency release for the door?

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    24 hours ago

    It would be crazy sci-fi villian if Musk had mobile access to everyone’s Tesla and he is just killing off customers he doesn’t like by doing shit like refusing to unlock the doors.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 day ago

    Explain to me how the engineers aren’t guilty of manslaughter?

    Look, I lasted one semester at engineering school, washed all the way out almost immediately. I still had to write a 10-page case study on an engineering failure, and the one I chose was the McDonnell-Douglas DC-10 cargo door failures. They teach this shit in failing community colleges in purple states. The buck stops with the PE that signed the plans. Drag his ass into criminal court. The person who allowed this design to go to production does not need to be free.

    • oyo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      There are no PEs signing off on “consumer products,” or even little things like airplanes.

      (Seriously, PEs are only relevant in engineering fields where design is easily governed by standards, such as HVAC and civil.)

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        There are absolutely engineers (with or without PE licenses, I’m not sure if that’s necessary in aerospace) signing off on airplanes, even after they’re built. For a mechanic to make a major modification or repair to an airframe or power plant it needs to be approved somehow, either covered by the airplane’s original Type Certificate and detailed in the maintenance manual, covered in a supplemental type certificate (STC), or they can work with an aeronautical engineer to design and approve the repair. I have forgotten the exact line between “you can get an A&P IA to approve this skin patch plate” and “You need to either call an AE to design a repair for this but it might be cheaper to buy a whole wing.”

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The people who design the Tesla cars are not engineers. They’re a bunch of tech geeks who think they’re engineers.

      I mean, ask yourself this why is. Every single automobile that exists today with the exception of the Tesla can handle rain and car washes with absolutely no issues and yet Teslas have to have a special button to close off certain parts of the car so that the air intake doesn’t get too wet otherwise the car ends up stinking horribly of mildew.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        The people who design the Tesla cars are not engineers. They’re a bunch of tech geeks who think they’re engineers.

        There is still someone’s signature.

        If needed, liquidate company.

    • Laser@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      They won’t because this would require a trial where rich people wouldn’t benefit, which is a waste of government resources, which goes against the Department of Government Efficiency’s goals. More efficient to throw these poor souls’ families under the bus.

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Where’s the Safety FMEA! Show me the FMEA!

      Risk 3452.7: feature, door. Function, opens during fire, failure mode: won’t open during fire, trapping people inside. Cause: the darn things are electronic! So if the battery fails in a big ass fire with people inside, those fuckers are gonna cook real good! Engineering controls in place to prevent the failure mode: 200,000 units delivered in time! As in it took time to deliver the units. Risk rank: 😉 it’s Frank! 😄 My name’s Frank! Not rank!

      Well I’m glad we took time to mitigate these risks.

  • raoul@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Elon Musk-owned automaker has a troubling history of owners getting locked in their cars without power. Some of these cases may be down to user error, since most Teslas come with manual release levers.

    Of course, let’s blame the users 🙄

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yea the cheapest ones skipped the manual release for the back doors. Gotta deliver maximum value to shareholders!

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Now, now, remember correlation is not causation. Maybe it’s not the unintuitive design; maybe a disproportionate number of idiots buy Teslas?

    • Sporkbomber@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      In the case of the model Y referenced, this release is under a mat. You wouldn’t see it in normal operation.

    • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I don’t want to be a dick but not using the mechanism to open them is user error.

      But it does also sound like they aren’t very well placed in some models. I feel like the manual release being the same as any car would make sense. As a fucking standard door handle.

      I assume the no power locking is an anti theft thing. But if you’re in the car already just provide a handle.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        62
        ·
        2 days ago

        If the door can’t be opened easily in a panicked life or death situation, it’s a design flaw and needs to be recalled and fixed.

      • raoul@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        2 days ago

        I will be a dick: this is one of those imbeciles teck-bro takes, always comming with excuses for big tech "but actualy… "

        If you design a door handle and people cannot open it: your design is shit. Point.

        This was stupid when apple did it with the ‘you’re holding the phone wrong, idiot’, it is criminal when it is done on a security feature.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          It is because people don’t get a full walk through of how to unlatch it later on…they might on delivery day but at that point people are excited about a new car and not paying attention. And then because they never use it, they forget it exists

          • vxx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Just watch a video of how fast car fires spread into the cabin, and then ask yourself how often you asked someone how to leave a car in case of emergency before you entered.

            Add panic and the fact that you have to remove a panel or look under the floor mat to pull a string away from you, and you maybe will understand how this is just bad design.

            • pyre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              1 day ago

              if you make something with a door and the door needs a manual, your design is shit.

            • BCsven@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Oh I know it is not good. Even my Honda Fit has a messed up lock system, its almost like a sideways roller switch without a truly discernable lock/unlock position so in tu dark you can’t tell if it is rolled forward or not. Messes us up when we are in the passenger seat and son:t have the powelock handy

          • SoleInvictus
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Emergency exit mechanisms should be designed in such a way that one CAN forget about it or never even know about it, then have it obvious, readily available, and usable, all for/by the dumbest motherfucker in existence, in an emergency situation.

            The most common analogous situation is emergency exit door signage. Most companies do an annual fire drill, which isn’t enough to really learn anything. Emergency exit signs are easy to interpret and anyone can understand what they mean and use them to get to safety, regardless of prior experience.

            Vehicle doors should be the same. Tesla front doors tend to be easy and obvious to open in an emergency (I own one and front seat passengers frequently use the emergency latch instead of the door button), but the rear doors (for the people seated closest to the damn battery nonetheless) have ridiculously difficult emergency opening procedures.

            • BCsven@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              I agree. Some people aren’t level headed in a panic scenario. They need glow in the dark arrows like the markings on jet planes pointing to the canopy release

          • VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            So it’s not an intuitive design. A major error by itself. Since in a panic a passenger who does not know the secret is stranded inside.

            My sister has a tesla, I have ridden in it, and I have no clue how to open the door without power.

            • BCsven@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I get it, my friend has ModelS. He showed me the mechanical release, when I asked about loss of power. It is not intuitive.

      • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 days ago

        Opening a Rear Door with No Power

        You can open a rear door manually (if equipped) in the unlikely situation in which Model Y has no power:

        • Remove the mat from the bottom of the rear door pocket.
        • Press the red tab to remove the access door.
        • Pull the mechanical release cable forward.

        Note

        Not all Model Y vehicles are equipped with a manual release for the rear doors.

        Opening the front doors seems easy enough in the user manual, but opening the back doors requires you to remove a hidden panel then pull a cable, but not all versions of the car even have that hidden panel. Assuming the one in this article did, the car owner would need to give a little safety briefing to every passenger if you want to expect them to know how to open the door. And I’m really not sure what you’re expected to do if you have a kid in a carseat in the back.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have a Civic with a manual door handle, but after reading your comment … I think I’m going to get one to leave in the car just in case.

      • IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Should your car ever wind up submerged in water a hammer could come in handy. Make sure it’s a “break glass” type hammer, which has a point. Thick tempered glass is surprisingly strong.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      The spring-loaded kind are a lot easier to use in a cramped car and by people with less upper body strength. However, those won’t work on newer cars with dual-pane or laminated glass

    • eyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve seen people say that emergency window hammers don’t work with Tesla windows as they’re laminated in current models.

      • saigot@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Only the tesla truck claims to be bullet proof. This happened in a model y and the 5th person in the car narrowly survived because a bystander smashed the window.

  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 days ago

    “seemingly”

    Ye, it seemed like it so we just decided we’d rather burn alive than to actually try opening the door.

    News titles sometimes

    • streetfestival@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fair, but at least they’re reporting it and connecting the dots re: this tesla safety issue, which I haven’t seen from any legacy media

          • psvrh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            For now.

            When the Trump administration is done gutting the NHTSA, not so much.

          • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            They are safer for the occupants. With their increased size, increased sound dampening, and reduced visibility, they are more dangerous to those outside of the vehicle.

            • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              Edit: my view was changed. I was wrong. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/injury.htm

              Oh sure, but A LOT of people don’t have to worry about that. I go from my house directly the highway for 1 hour before I get to my job. I’d rather be safer on the highway for my 2+ hours of commuting a day than the off chance some random is walking on the highway where he shouldn’t.

              • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 day ago

                I’m close to 2m tall, and the hoods of the trucks I walk by on my way to work are up to my shoulders, I think things like size aren’t really helping. Naturally, maybe 1 of every 10 trucks this size appear to actually be for work.

                I think a lot of the modern safety improvements are great, but just making every vehicle gigantic is doing a lot of harm.

                • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Agreed. And having automated controls for breaking would be a magnificent leap forward. Unless the government steps in to slow down those products there isn’t anything to be done.

                  You can see reform starting in the form of the “Carolina squat” being outlawed in a lot of states to help alleviate some of that pain.

              • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 day ago

                Literally everyone should worry about that.

                Does anybody drop off their children at school? Do they cross the street? Do they travel?

                Pedestrian hostile cars are an everybody issue.

                • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Come on. Yes I agree with you but obviously you know that there is nuance to that issue just as others. We aren’t talking about gun control.

          • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            There’s more to safety than having the biggest or fanciest car. It’s road design, rules, speed, training, etc.

            With the skills of an average American driver you wouldn’t get your license in some countries.

            • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yea! Most of us are fucking horrible at driving. Automated processes for safety make us lazier too.

              Our road design is pretty well done but the speed/training is fucking atrocious.

    • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Worried about libel, it is very likely that someone like Musk would sue.

      If they said “It was the fault of Tesla that these people are dead” without proof and without it being a quote from someone else, they can be sued pretty easily.

      Authorities are still investigating the crash and fire. But the details that we have so far implicate to some degree the electronic doors used by Tesla and other automakers, which require power to open.

  • Stoposto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Why is it Lemmy is okay with Outrage culture when it targets Tesla/SpaceX/Apple, yet criticized else where?

    So reading these comments most people don’t understand that many cars have electronic doors for several valid design reasons and yet all I have seen have manual overrides. Tesla as many other cars without window trims have to lower the glass before you can open the door. Most if not all cars even German makes do this electronicly but like my Tesla, have a manual handle that mechanicly drops the glass windows panel so you can open normally.

    Both my Tesla and friends VW Benzin(Gas) car som 15 years ago use the same system… If the car have no trim and electronic windows, you also have this design issue, which extends this to ALL car brands.

    But yea let’s throw reason out the window and yell “Tesla bad!!!”…

    How if it is true some models don’t have the manual override (and that might include none Tesla cars if there indeed is no regulation that mandates it) I feel bad for the people not knowing or the safety ratings ignoring this oversight.

    I can just say, mine does and is mentioned in the safety rating used in EU.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      How the fuck is being sad about preventable deaths “outrage culture”?

      Why does stoposto promote Shitty Post Culture?

    • LePoisson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think it’s more like

      Car on fire PANIC!!! OH SHIT I can’t just pull this door handle to get out. Oh God it’s so hot, what’s happening … (Get disoriented) … Trying to find a way out still. A series of steps with a hidden release has to happen - hope you knew that before you climbed in.

      Yeah many cars do have electronic doors, but they can be easily opened without electricity in a simple way. Yank the handle.

      For some reason Tesla thought that was a bad idea. It’s stupid, I know they should have broken a window but when you’re panicking going on years of experience opening car doors you’re going to try to open them the way you know how.

      So, yeah, it’s not just because it’s a Tesla - it’s because it’s a dangerous and dumb engineering choice that they made which puts people’s lives in danger unnecessarily.

      • Stoposto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Many people in my Tesla have janked the emergency handle, rather than clicking the button to get out without any emergency, there isn’t any Door handle, there is the emergency handle… Which kinda proves my point and your outrage comment proves you haven’t even been in a Tesla yet comment on “it’s bad design”.

        Same kind of comments from people against seatbelts when they were introduced. “It’s not the standard and people will burn in their cars” without seeing or trying a seatbelt.

        It very much is because it’s a Tesla because my point about Tesla not being the only car which use electric windows control pre opening the door. Yet people hating on “EV needs power to get out” failing to realise that many Gas powered vehicles require the same thing. Some even implemented explosives that need to push the door off to be able to get out.

        • LePoisson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Sweet, what about back seat folks?

          Also those other cars have easier ways of getting out in event for a power failure, not having to open a separate hidden compartment and pull a cable.

          I’ve been in Teslas and I’m not going to buy one. My used 2009 Mazda 3 has better build quality than the brand new Teslas. Silly AF

          • Stoposto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Good to know this isn’t about fuckcars at all, it’s about fuck Tesla and changes to upset the Gas industry.

            Good to know as I’d rather enjoyed Lemmy but if it’s a Russia, Saudi and US lobby pushing their agenda here, ohh well

        • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Many people in my Tesla have janked the emergency handle, rather than clicking the button to get out without any emergency, there isn’t any Door handle, there is the emergency handle… Which kinda proves my point and your outrage comment proves you haven’t even been in a Tesla yet comment on “it’s bad design”.

          That might be true for the front seat, but what about the back? I doubt you’d have 4 passengers all up front with you in the passenger seat.

          I’ve never been in a Tesla, but according to the owner’s manual the emergency release for the back seat is a cable behind a hidden panel, and not all models actually have that hidden panel.

    • GameGod@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      If there was a burning car and I had to open your Tesla’s door from the outside to save you, you’re dead because I wouldn’t be able to figure out how to use the handle, regardless of whether the thing was still powered or not.

        • icedterminal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          If the occupant is unconscious, dragging one out of the window can make things significantly worse if there are injuries from a crash. The door handle should always be available. Even if the door won’t open on one side because of an impact there, use the other side. There are much better alternatives than dragging someone over shattered glass out of a window.

          • Noxy@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s safety glass. More like pebbles than sharp shards. Please drag me over shattered automotive glass if I’m otherwise burning alive in a car.

      • Stoposto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have had many people ride in my Tesla and most of them opened the door by pulling the emergency handle… By instinct. So great job reading a headline and commenting without ever being in a Tesla, calling something you have never seen “bad design”.

        Some kind of argument this group deals with when people say " busses/trains don’t work [instead made up thing they have never seen]"

        Great job furthering the cause or any change at improving anything.

        • GameGod@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m talking about accessing the Tesla from the outside. It’s not obvious how you do that, and I’ve been picked up by several Teslas that were Ubers. (IIRC isn’t there something like the handles don’t pop out if the doors are locked too? I just remember that I’ve struggled with this)

          • Stoposto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            So anyone in a sports car? Porsche, Massaratti, Audi, Ferrari and many others used these way before Tesla…

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why is it Lemmy is okay with Outrage culture when it targets Tesla/SpaceX/Apple, yet criticized else where?

      Is that a serious question?

      • Stoposto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It is. I very much enjoy fuckcars and push for public transport when possible. However I hate the traditional car companies more for lying and burying alternatives to ICE more than I do the one company that in 10 years changed a stagnant Gas/Benzin polluting product which got bigger and bigger to a now Electric alternatives. That includes the side effect in my city for electric busses which were not a thing before said company and the change in zeitgeist around EV vs ICE.

        So yes I’m in fuck cars and I am saying while I hate the current CEO of the company, I also recognize their success have pushed and improved my local public transport system and city (which in 2030 will ban all ICE cars from its center with a much larger push towards public alternatives at the same time).

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    CBC Link

    I can think of only a few situations where you’d want to get out of a car quickly, where you’d have enough time to look under all the matte covers to find a manual door release switch that may or may not be installed. A fire is certainly not one of them. At the very least shouldn’t they be equipped with a Nothammer…?

    • eyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve seen it said elsewhere that these don’t work on the windows of current Tesla models as they’re laminated.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          They did it ostensibly for safety, as it will keep people from being ejected in a rollover. However, they also probably have manual releases.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        tesla gonna tesla so I assume they are as dangerous as can be.

        For the rest? There is always (?) one window that isn’t reinforced. So that CAN be an issue if your cabin is significantly damaged. But otherwise? It is a problem to find in a high adrenaline emergency and you SHOULD be aware which window to smash, but you are 3-6 smacks away from being out.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is there an advantage to such an electronic door opener? If they have to include a manual release anyways, it really doesn’t seem like they’d save space.

    I guess, there might be novelty to just pressing a button, but not burning alive is also quite a cool feature.