• astanix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      My wife uses a TV to watch YouTube, My kid uses a phone, My other kid uses a tablet.

      Saying just use ad block isn’t feasible for everyone.

          • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            +1 for Vinegar. My only real complaint is that I use Firefox as a daily driver, and Vinegar only works with Safari. Even though Firefox is using the Safari engine under the hood on iOS, (because Apple doesn’t allow third party browser engines like Firefox’s Gecko, and forces everyone to use WebKit instead,) it doesn’t support Safari extensions.

            I’m fine with switching to Safari to watch YouTube… But since Firefox is my default browser, YouTube links automatically open in Firefox. There isn’t a way to specify that I want everything except YouTube to open in my default browser.

            • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 days ago

              I feel you! Firefox Focus is my daily driver, but occasionally its adblocking doesn’t work on YouTube so I have to manually open it in Safari :c

      • Funkwonker
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 days ago

        SmartTube for TV and ReVanced/uYouPlus for Andriod/IOS devices. SmartTube can be tricky to set up depending on the TV, but the mobile apps are relatively simple to get working.

        • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          There is no ReVanced or uYouPlus for iOS. You have to sideload that shit, cuz YouTube is too far up Apple’s ass for them to allow something like that on the App Store.

          Ironically, they allow Vinegar. But only because it’s a Safari extension (and Apple likes when people use Safari more than they like the money from YouTube.)

          • scarilog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            You have to sideload that shit

            That’s a price you pay when you buy apple. Thankfully it is still an option, just takes a bit more time and effort than on android.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Do creator even get any real amount of money from the money collected through premium?

      Buying premium seems like the dumbest shit imaginable to me.

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        11 days ago

        They do, and based on reported stats it gets them more per viewer. No idea if anybody’s audited those stats though

        • NateSwift@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          11 days ago

          Not sure about currently but at least a year or two ago creators could see the split of premium views & income vs free views and income and premium views always paid out more

          • elgordino@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            11 days ago

            They still can. Whether premium or ad supported views pays more depends on the channel and the value of the adverts that are streamed on it. For channels / topics that advertisers are keen to appear on the ad supported views pay more, for more niche interests the premium views pay more.