I highly doubt the left will do anything uncivil. How can they win back the country? Is it too late?

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    187
    ·
    16 days ago

    Democracy is just the tyranny of the majority.

    I think that most of the Americans want this, even if people on the outside do not understand. So in that sense they are right now winning back their country, as confusing as it might sound.

    • Deadlytosty@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      101
      ·
      16 days ago

      Normally in Democracy the majority or popular vote wins, however due to the electoral college America has, it doesnt necessarily mean the majority voted for the winner. This was the case for Bush, and some other moments in the past.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          165
          ·
          16 days ago

          How in the fuck.

          Like what drives a majority of Americans to vote for a demented toddler. It’s insane.

          As a kid I always wondered how on Earth did Hitler ever make anyone follow himself, how did those people not realise. Turns out a majority of people are just fucking morons.

          • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            For all practical purposes, about 30% of people are unfeeling morons - basically psychopaths. That’s the number that consistently opposes abortion, for instance. Add to that all the dumbasses who don’t know any better (the undecideds on any extremely obvious moral issue), et voila. That’s how you get slavery, nationalism, genocide, theocracy, you name it.

            Unless people are willing to screen for psychopathy and remove it from the gene pool, the human species will keep fucking around until it finds out. Might be nuclear apocalypse or environmental collapse, but at this rate it’s inevitable.

          • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 days ago

            The rise of the NSDAP has been studied quite a bit. Also, the psychological aspects are really interesting. Basically normal people can make all of this possible as long as the conditions are just right.

          • Coco
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            There are many leftists and minorities that have “voted strategically” time and time and time again only for things to get worse and worse.

            This kind of disenfranchisement leads to apathy and low turnout.

            We are told from a young age that our vote matters, and then when we are older we are told you can only vote for red fascist or blue fascist and many choose not to participate.

            There are more who did not vote than who voted for Trump. This is not what the majority wants, but with the system as it is, it is not possible for the majority to voice what they actually genuinely want and have a chance to get it.

            The votes do not have to be rigged at the ballot box for voting as a whole system to be rigged.

          • Wooki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            Non mandatory voting wouldnt help, being that its more susceptible to eroding a merit process from campaigns of fear or otherwise.

        • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          And I was so loving Lina Khan’s FTC, asking among other things…

          Edit: autocorrect

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        66
        ·
        16 days ago

        Whether it’s 48 or 52 % is an immaterial difference. Every other American who voted, voted for Trump. The rest don’t seem to care either way. He has very broad popular assent and is as popular as Harris give or take a margin of error.

        Everyone is lasered-focused on the EC because it makes all the difference for the practicalities, but if one is to make a broad judgement of whether Trump won fair and square the answer is “yeah, mostly”. Further proof is the fact that the House is probably going to be his as well.

        Americans now bear the collective responsibility for the horrors of the next 4(+?) years. Do not make the mistake of blaming the popular will of outright fascism on institutional failures, because institutions didn’t force half of Americans to vote for the fascist, again.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          16 days ago

          I’ll wait 72 hours before settling with it, in case any shenanigans were involved. I expect it’s legitimate, but I want that window open if it’s needed.

      • Fosheze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        16 days ago

        Trump is winning the popular vote by a pretty decent margin. The electoral college isn’t the issue here.

        • gerbler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          16 days ago

          They haven’t finished counting that’s why. Rural areas are faster to count and skew conservative.

          A republican hasn’t won the popular vote in 20 years. Trump is projected to win but like last time he’ll lose the popular vote and win by virtue of the electoral college.

          • Fosheze@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            16 days ago

            All the projections I’m seeing him show him almost certainly winning the popular vote. There’s a gap of 6 million votes and almost every state is over 90% reported in. That gap is going to likely shrink a bit, but unfortunately it almost certainly won’t be enough for him to even lose the popular vote.

            Lets face it, we’re (assuming you’re american) apparently just a country of facists. It looks like GOP is going to have majority in both houses too so here comes project 2025 I guess.

            • gerbler@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              25
              ·
              16 days ago

              Sorry bud, not a yank. You have my sympathies though.

              If it turns out that he does indeed win the popular vote then yeah I’m sorry for your loss. A nest of at least 50% fascists or fascist enablers.

              Heart aches for those that did their civic duty and yet have to suffer the repercussions :(

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            It looks like turnout is way down compared to last election. Trump is pulling about the same amount he did last time ( maybe a few million down, but there are still results to get). Harris is currently down 15M from where Biden was.

            Trump’s support is no larger than it was last time. Harris’ supporters just didn’t show up

            • superkret@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              16 days ago

              Harris’ supporters just didn’t show up

              Anyone who didn’t show up is not a Harris supporter.

          • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            Wasn’t he ahead in 2016 around this time, but then once all was said and done he was a few mil behind?

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        u̇nfoṙtcėnetlı, H ſımz t bı ƿinıŋ ð pȯpyulṙ vot æz ƿel.

        spoiler

        Unfortunately, he seems to be winning the popular vote as well.

      • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        I believe the states responsible for those silly outcomes have since passed laws to prevent it happening again.

        Could be wrong, but I listened to a podcast last week with an American professor who’s pretty much written the book, explaining the history of the Electoral College and how it really works. I’m sure he said those states since fixed those loopholes.

        Either way, the damage is done today. Another four years of stupidity in charge.

        • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 days ago

          This is not correct. The electoral college is exactly as susceptible to giving the win to the person with fewer votes as it was in 2000 and 2016. It’s also not an issue that’s due to any state in particular and is not an issue that can be solved by individual state action. The NPVIC would fix it but requires the cooperation of many states and is not in effect, and has stalled pretty hard in recent years.

              • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                15 days ago

                Seriously - the whole thing is such a befuddling mess to us non-Americans.

                How exactly can one win the popular vote but not the actual election? From the outside, the reporting I’ve seen always talks about the faithless elector problem (not in those words - just in describing the problems). Is it more to do with how many votes (electors) each state gets, based on population size?

                • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  That’s it, yes - each state gets as many electoral votes as it has congressmen, including senators. Most states award all of their electoral votes to whoever wins the state, with no proportionality to it at all - only two states (Nebraska and Maine, neither one large) do anything proportional with their votes.

                  With a system like that it’s easier to see how things can end up with the less popular candidate winning - they can, for example, sneak by with 50.1% of the vote in just enough states to win, but bomb it out with 20% of the vote in all the other states. That’s an extreme example specifically for the purpose of illustration, but less extreme versions of that are usually what happens.

                  The electoral votes also aren’t distributed entirely fairly - the number of electoral votes per person tends to be larger for less populated states. The less populated states also tend to be Republican states. So in a very real sense, each person’s vote counts for “more” in those states, and “less” in states with high populations. I don’t believe it’s really possible to fix this problem without vastly increasing the number of electoral votes, but congress currently has its size capped at 535 members for what I consider not very good reasons.

                  Yes, the whole system is trash from the ground up. But much of its structure is defined in the constitution itself, which is very difficult to change.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      16 days ago

      No, there is a concerted effort by conservatives to use voter suppression to subvert the will of the majority in the US.

      conservatives are clawing back the country right now by hook and by crook.

      can’t go on forever, but I don’t know which is going to last longer: the country or the aging frightened conservatives willing to subvert democracy to hang on to control.

      • Seleni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Isn’t just the aging ones sadly. Lots of young people, especially young men, went for Trump. Andrew Tate has taught them well.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 days ago

          progressive policies are annually more popular and conservative policies and election results like 2016 and 2024 are won mainly by the old guard funding and utilizing their careful network of voting interference and collusion.

          Andrew Tate is a vile exception amongst younger generations, not the rule.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      16 days ago

      I think that most of the Americans want this

      Maybe, but none of the facts directly support this.

      There have been large campaigns to disenfranchise several types of voters for decades in the country. The Electoral College was designed to be unfair to appease Slave states. Voter turnout is abysmal, only about 35% of eligible citizens vote. Out of those turnout is usually around the same percentage. The highest turnout recently was 2020 only because mail in voting was expanded so dramatically, and even then it was only 67% of registered voters, so it was still only 67% of that original 37% of eligible voters. So with the highest recent turnout, we’re looking at about 25% of eligible citizens actually voting.

      • Max@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 days ago

        I believe that the 67% number for the 2020 election is of eligible voters and not registered voters. While turnout is low, it’s not 25% low.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          16 days ago

          It was ~67% of eligible voters that were registered to vote. Over 94% of registered voters actually voted.

    • illi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 days ago

      Democracy really is the worst form of government, just not as bad as all the others…

      Unfortunately in such polarized times like now, even though majority wants this, the ammount of people for which this is unacceptable is only slightly less than “the majority”. And besides, I believe a big part of “the majority” is just gullible enough to be persuaded they want this while it actually goes against their interests

        • Hugin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          16 days ago

          It’s a famous quote. The contradiction is intentional. It means democracy has a lot of problems and often looks terrible. However when you step back and consider the alternatives they are worse.

        • illi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 days ago

          Take it up with Winston Churchil - I was just paraphrasing his quote.

          The point is democracy is terrible, but we don’t have anything better.

  • Myro@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    16 days ago

    I think this is going to be the end of the USA as we know it. After this period, democracy will be significantly impacted.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      16 days ago

      The western world as a whole should be terrified. There has been a sharp dip towards conservatism that will only accelerate with Trump back at the helm in the US. Brexit didn’t occur in a vacuum.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        16 days ago

        Though this isn’t about conservatism, is it? Trump doesn’t like democracy and half of the things that shaped the USA. I mean there is some overlap but he should be opposed by any sane conservative. I think it’s more a dip towards fascism or something else.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          16 days ago

          Can be a bit of both. Everything is prompted by a desire to return to the “before” times. For Trump’s supporters, that is a hypothetical, undefined time when America was “great”. For the Brexiters in the UK, that was the pre-EU period when Britain was a global empire. For the conservatives in Russia, it is the yearning for the USSR days.

          • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            16 days ago

            Fair enough. I always hope we’ll move towards a better future… And not backwards. But you’re right. You pick some random time in history and then make up some policies that supposedly get you back to that place. And an additional psychological factor is, most of us had our best time when we were young, life was easier, less work and less consequence. So we might want that back instead of our current, more complex life.

      • alleycat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Pretty dystopic that you post this quote, because it is doctored to include catholics. Niemöller’s wife explicitly stated that he never included them in his poem. Source: https://martin-niemoeller-stiftung.de/martin-niemoeller/was-sagte-niemoeller-wirklich

        Martin Niemöllers zweite Frau (seit 1971), Sibylle von Sell  schreibt dazu am 23.4.2000 in h-holocaust https://www.h-net.org/~holoweb/ :.“ The trouble with Martin Niemoeller’s „famous quotation“ is that he never wrote it down – which enabled  so many hitchhikers  over the years to „put themselves on the waggon“. In his  „Confession of Guilt“  (as he called it himself: Schuldbekenntnis in German) the Communists came first, then the Trade Unionists and then the Socialists and then the Jews. NO ONE ELSE.”

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        16 days ago

        Just be grateful if you’re not in one of the first groups. I spoke up as loudly as I could.

    • gramie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      16 days ago

      The problem is that nowhere is safe now. I’m Canadian, and I wish I had somewhere to go. And just imagine how the poor sods in Palestine, Ukraine, and so many other suffering countries, are feeling right now.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if Vladimir Putin’s armies weren’t occupying large swaths of Eastern Europe by the end of this term.

      • TehBamski@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        I wouldn’t be surprised if Vladimir Putin’s armies weren’t occupying large swaths of Eastern Europe by the end of this term.

        And Russia will use, what? Tanks from the Cold War?! There have been many reports from professional defense intel groups and countries that report that Russia has been struggling to keep fighting the invasion of Ukraine. They’ve had to resort to asking North Korea to send thousands of troops to fight in Ukraine. With the weapons that the EU, Australia, Britain, and the US have been sending them, Russia is going to have a tremendously difficult time fighting back. Let alone, invading another country.

        There’s a theory going around that China might take action and ‘take back’ what they claim to have been their territory from the early 1800s. Either they capture Serbia as a whole, southern Serbia, or a large portion of Eastern Russia. Which might look like the northern point of Lake Baikal to Uda Gulf or the push further and take Taul Bay. The southern part of the Kamchatka peninsula would be advantageous to them. The US and others would have a harder time “controlling” China’s fleet of ships if they had ports and bases up there as well.

        I can only hold onto fool’s faith for so long, that the world doesn’t experience another major war.

  • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    16 days ago

    Honestly at this point y’all should just get the fuck out. Where to? Anywhere honestly. You’ll probably find the third world preferable to a post project 2025 Murica.

    Russia’s been having a major brain drain issue as all people with functioning brains either have escaped or want to escape the country. I don’t see why Americans should do any different.

      • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        It would.

        But I think that ship has sailed.

        And honestly it might be the third-worlder-accustomed-to-things-being-uttter-bullshit in me. But I think “Winning back the country” is an unrealistic and foolhardy goal. Everyone who is on the radar for being harmed by Trump should look out for themselves and their own. Which includes “getting the fuck out of the country” if that is what it takes.

        Additionally: A significant portion of the country won today. They got exactly what they wanted. And pretending that this neofascism is some kind of external infection is tantamount to covering one’s own ears.

        • mhague@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          I’d recommend assassination, in Minecraft. If you’re leaving the server and everything is fucked then do one for the team and cause some heads to roll, in Minecraft. The right used violence and it led to the presidency. A coup was rewarded. Let’s take some notes.

        • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          16 days ago

          pretending that this neofascism is some kind of external infection is tantamount to covering one’s own ears.

          See, I think it’s mixed. You’re absolutely right that people voted for this. At the same time, years of propaganda by monied interests have led us up to this point. Authoritarianism has been low-key popular at least since the 90s (maybe earlier, but the 90s was when I started school, and learned by experience that fascism is how the school system operates.) People are scared to rock the boat against their “leaders,” and given enough time, this is the result.

          I wish I had time right now to write more about this, because there is some deep psychological manipulation that’s embedded in the fabric of this country. It doesn’t excuse people’s behaviors, but knowing how and why they operate is crucial to understanding the big picture.

          • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            16 days ago

            At the same time, years of propaganda by monied interests have led us up to this point

            See you’re right but –

            – Those monied interests are also coming from within. The wealthy and powerful from America who see this as a way to consolidate and protect their own wealth and power.

            Silicon Valley wanted Neofascism. Wall Street wanted Neofascism. Fracking Barons like the Koch Brother(s) wanted Neofascism. Some out in the open, like the afore-mentioned Koch(s) and Elon Musk, but make no mistake, every billionaire who “shuts up about politics” is most likely a Neofascist in private, because this benefits them.

            The people in America are heavily propagandised, but that propaganda is funded and developed by and for the benefit of the wealthy within America itself.

            Some people lean really hard into the whole “russian influence” thing because it is comforting. And it is entirely possible that there ARE Russian fingers in this pie – Russia does benefit from a weakened America, in any way they CAN weaken it. Heck, China and the Middle Eastern powers do too, so maybe they have fingers in that pie too.

            But never forget that it started with wealthy Americans, and not some foreign agent. And if every foreign influence walked away, it would continue without them.

            Theoretically, The Revolution™ that lefties like me talk about could change things. Just like theoretically, a peaceful political reform could change things. Theoretically.

            But I’m from the third world. Hopelessness is my bread and butter rice and beans. So I’m entirely accustomed to daydreaming of one day things changing, while expecting elections to change nothing, and knowing for a fact that any attempt at armed fighting would most likely end in a victory for the bad guys (they have the bigger guns).

            The idea of “things are already fucked, have been since before you were born, if you want to make a difference, look out for yourself and those you CAN help, make a difference in the micro, because The System as a macro thing is outside your reach entirely” is in fact how most people have dealt with things since forever, and we survive.

            • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              16 days ago

              It sounds like we’re on the same page. I didn’t mention foreign influence, only monied influence, which is the same thing you’re saying.

              My point was that these influences previously existed in the U.S. long before now. They didn’t materialize out of the blue. Anyone who’s been explicitly anti-fascist prior to the past decade knows that there was already an undercurrent pulling people in that direction.

              I appreciate hearing your perspective, and you’re absolutely on point. One thing I know for sure is that things are going to get a lot worse before they get better.

      • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 days ago

        This has actually all been a very elaborate “come to Brazil” meme on my part.

        Jokes aside, given how a lot of our people tend to worship the floor 'Murica walks on, if a bunch of refugees from the US came over, they’d probably be welcomed with open arms. :P

        • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          I suppose we shall see. They have a decent agreement with Germany to my knowledge. But only if you want to work on the black market or live on the streets

    • Zacpod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      Come on up to Canada. We’ve been suffering brain drain for ages, and could sure use some scientists and doctors!

  • Jimmybander@champserver.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    16 days ago

    America has past the point of no return on education. Anti-intellectualism is the status quo now. It’s only gonna get worse now.

    • x0chi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      They won’t need it… they got people to think what it’s best for them, what books are good or bad, what values you should have, how you should live. And then they will also have chatgpt and AI that will answer their doubts and even do their work cause they won’t be capable of doing it. I wonder if the AI will get “less smart” because of their clients needs being more basic. We’ll see

  • ashok36@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    16 days ago

    What do you mean? Trump won decisively. Electoral, popular, in the senate, etc…

    You’re really asking, “how does a minority continue to exist in the face of a fascist majority?”

    The answer is, generally, they don’t.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 days ago

      I think that is an oversimplification. He won the popular vote, but that’s the majority of voters, not the majority of people, right? So we cannot accurately say that the majority is fascist. We can only say that the voting majority is fascist.

      And then we need to look at who was conned, and how. Of course people who got conned need to work harder to avoid that in the future. We all agree on that. At the same time, the con artists and the people who enable the con, we also need to identify them and figure out what’s making them successful. If we talk about major newspapers and TV networks failing to cover how bad Trump actually was, or putting Harris on unrealistic pedestal, newspaper owners refusing to allow newspaper editors to endorse a candidate, the way Fox News preys on people who grew up trusting TV news and now have only watched Fox for the last two decades, open lies about who’s eating cats and dogs, a DNC that pushes centrist candidates even after 2016 when the weakness was exposed, and it’s clear that many left-wing voters are wildly unhappy, those are all things that smaller groups have done to help create the situation that we saw yesterday. And that’s just a short list.

      So what I hope we can do, is I hope we can avoid saying something trite like, this is what the American people wanted, full stop. If you want to make that a conversation starter, go for it. But it shouldn’t be a dismissive conversation ender, because it ignores what actually happened and What will continue to happen in the future.

      • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        15 days ago

        He won the popular vote, but that’s the majority of voters, not the majority of people, right?

        Right, the rest are just so lazy and consumed by apathy that they could not be bothered to vote when THESE were the stakes. I think we can confidently rule them out for any advocacy for our freedom.

  • Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    16 days ago

    Facism is capitalism in decay. America just proved that the decay is rapid.

    Liberal institutions just paved the way for facism to take root.

    • M600@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      16 days ago

      I’d like to learn more about

      Facism is capitalism in decay.

      Is that just a think people say or are their studies or books about this?

      • Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        16 days ago

        Facism is a reaction to the institutional failures of capitalism brought about by many scholars. Mainly brought about by the working class left behind looking for a change to the system.

        Places in history where it happened

        italy (1920’s) voters wanted a stronger economy with trains to run on time germany (1920’s) voters wanted a stronger economy without a destabilization of currency

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    This isn’t sides anymore.

    Until America wants to be tolerant of more than intolerance, it seems it will vote with its penises, wallets, and weapons.

    Edit: unnecessary apostrophe

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    THIS is the moment where everyone should be creating 3rd party candidates and going to the streets to spread awareness for the next election.

    Not 6 months before the election with trump as a possibility. Get out there and promote 3rd party now, when people are pissed at Democrats for throwing it all away for Israel and people are pissed the trump won.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      IMO third party is not viable unless we change our voting system, but people keep voting out the progressive reform party so fat chance.

      EDIT: 100% for independents in Congress tho, as long as it doesnt split the vote for progressives.

    • Philosofuel@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      16 days ago

      Do you really think they lost over their stance on Israel/Palestina? Not saying it doesn’t matter. But I feel if you see how many votes republicans got, that a lot of (perceived) domestic issues played a very big role.

    • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      No, 3rd party will always be spoiler at best with the election system we have… Now is the time to figure out who runs the local Dems in your state/county/city/town and take them over… We need to take over the Dems and transition them to the party of the future

  • Fester@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    16 days ago

    Hope there will be a legitimate election in 2028, and show up to the fucking primary before it and in 2026.

    I think Trump won because of the economy. Yes, he has a rabid base that really does want his fascism, but the voters who pushed him over the edge are ones suffering because inflation and the wealth gap that has just been allowed to increase unimpeded. Those voters don’t want fascism - they’re just dumb AF and don’t pay attention. They just voted for “change.”

    These problems will only increase over the next 4 years, so there will be another opportunity defy the status quo in 2028. We had a chance and failed to do in 2016. We came closer in 2020. We didn’t have a real primary in 2024. When we get to 2028, it’s time to fucking do it.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        16 days ago

        Here’s the thing… He said he would bring change. Biden, and Harris after, both said that things would basically stay the same. For a lot of people, that’s an active issue they’re dealing with everyday.

        The politicians just don’t understand because they haven’t lived like normal people for decades, if ever given the history and family of many of them.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    16 days ago

    The average death age of any empire is 250 years.

    Tick tock America. You’re proving that figure to be correct.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    16 days ago

    They just did. They’ll happily lie in the bed they shat in at first. By the time they realize their mistake, it will be too late.

  • Willie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    16 days ago

    Wait 2 years, and hopefully put people who will mitigate the damage into the positions listed on your ballot. All you can do now as a law abiding citizen is wait.

    • intelisense@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      16 days ago

      I fear that the next election will be more ceremony than democracy once they have finished rigging it. At this point, I expect a third term for Trump - if he lives that long.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        16 days ago

        He won’t. The goal was to get Vance in all along. He’s a docile pet for Thiel and co to implement their fascist agenda.

      • Willie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        16 days ago

        Your fear of a 3rd term makes it all the more important to vote in your future elections. As the two term limit is imposed through a constitutional amendment, they’d need to create another constitutional amendment to reverse it. They need 2/3rds of both the house and the senate to agree to even get the ball rolling, as such, it is vital that you do what you can to prevent them from acquiring those numbers to avoid that situation.

        If it did happen, I wonder if the democrats would run Obama again.

        • intelisense@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          16 days ago

          I don’t think they need a constitutional amendment, just Scotus ruling that it only applies to consecutive terms, for example.

          • Cubes@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            I know the supreme Court is heavily biased at the moment, but what possible logic could they use to get out of the 22nd amendment saying “no person shall be elected to the office of the president more than twice”? They can’t just add words there, and it isn’t ambiguous at all

        • Spraynard Kruger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          16 days ago

          If Republicans remove term limits, it would be amazing to see Obama instantly get reelected for a third term in 2028.

          That being said, the USA may not get another legitimate election (help us).

          If it did happen, I wonder if the democrats would run Obama again.

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    16 days ago

    See, there’s the horrifying possibility that they just did and this is what Americans are.

    Eh, forget it. they probably need a minute before reckoning with that one.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        16 days ago

        Not being American, I will need some convincing about why the US doesn’t belong in the same bucket as, say, Hungary or Turkey. If you keep self inflicting the rule of strongmen and their oligarch cronies at some point that’s a core feature.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    16 days ago

    I’m not sure that we do. Not in our lifetimes anyway.

    With a functional justice department we’d have a chance. There’s nothing to stop them from tweaking the electoral lines. There’s nothing to stop them from not certifying an election. We’re about to have the scotus filled with young like-minded Republicans. We’re about to have every federal judge biased for them.

    Even having both sides of Congress the best thing we could do would be to status quo because every time a veto is overturned the scotus could just stamp it down as unconstitutional.

    The president has God King status, he can have opponents jail for executed.

    The thing is even if none of these things were in play, The popular vote just voted for a dictatorship. He was utterly and absolutely clear and anyone that says he was joking around doesn’t actually believe that they’re just too embarrass socially to announce that they themselves are racist/fascist/misogynist. There is nothing here to win back. We’re better than 50% rotten to the core and those people aren’t going away.

    Even this election wasn’t right versus left it’s right versus more right. If you put a true left candidate in they’re just going to get murdered. (That may or may not be literal)

    • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 days ago

      I’m not sure that we do. Not in our lifetimes anyway.

      I don’t understand this sentiment as I’m hearing it a lot.

      We’ve elected a fascist into the highest office. We’re cooked. There’s a lot we can do right now, but the most important thing is organizing. Organizing your community, your family, your town/village/city. Organizing mutual aid, direct action, and resistance. How much more do we need until people actually get off their asses and start doing something about it? Like the time for peaceful and democratic means of avoiding fascism was before the election. But a fascist is now in power, so are we going to wait until the troops are rolling down the street to do anything? I’m not saying go out and just commit wanton acts of violence in the name of revolution, but the longer we wait the more difficult it will become to get organized, involved, and yes armed.

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        16 days ago

        I don’t understand this sentiment

        There’s a lot we can do right now, but the most important thing is organizing

        Organizing? Resistance? Armed? That’s honestly insane.

        You’re going to organize against half the US? Gonna start a civil war with every last (fully armed) enemy in your own backyard?

        They could blockade cities from food and shut down any movement in 3 days.

        The Civil War worked efficiently because there was a battlefront. This is more of a Republican Soup.