• SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        I’m guessing he thought it was a fancy term for slaves. Which is wrong in a lot of ways, but also just weird…

        It’s the best read of it I can manage though…

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 days ago

        I bet he was being polite and he actually wanted to write “you would be my bitches”. Not polite, MAGA polite.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 days ago

        Or doesn’t know the meaning of concubines.

        I don’t know the meaning of that word either, but based on context I assume it’s because I’m not into any sketchy shit.

          • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 days ago

            Oh…yeah, I was thinking it was much darker. It sounds like some kind of metalic tub that you put children in to rape them in the fields of Alaska at an oil rig job.

            At least with mistress’s and partners consent is a key factor.

            • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              17 days ago

              In several countries, and absolutely historically, it’s actually been a government-classified relationship status.

              It just means people involved in a romantic and sexual relationship who are unwilling or unable to legally marry for whatever reason (because they are already married, because they aren’t legally qualified, such as one member is from a slave caste, etc)

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concubinage