YouTube? Deleted comment. Twitter? Banned, Reddit? Shadow banned and blocked Xbox live? You get kicked out online mode despite you are PAYING for it. You can’t express your anger or hate towards other people without some kind of freedom.
No I’m not saying that RACISM or serious accusations should be allowed, but a simple “fuck u” gets you eliminated. Is depressing.
What? Yes you can. Observe:
Go fuck yourself, OP.
It’s also not like getting banned for petty reasons is anything new. Forum ops, chat admins, moderators, etc all create and control the communities regardless of any corporate entities who own the website as a whole wanting to keep things PG for advertisers. Many of them do so because they themselves got kicked out of somewhere else. If you go into Big Jim’s forum and post a bunch of hate about Big Jim, expect Big Jim to ban your ass.
What you are saying is that we are all children and we are governed best with children’s rules.
I’m gonna go ahead and disagree with your initial premise there.
and we are governed best with children’s rules.
I said nothing of the sort. The first part is accurate; the petty mods who ban people just for disagreeing with them are children and play by children’s rules. How you came to the conclusion that I am suggesting that is the best way to do things, though, is beyond me. I simply stated the reality.
ah, my mistake.
You should have said this in the unpopular opinion community, honestly.
Thankfully so.
hey you’re being upvoted. What do you suppose that means?
How so? It used to be the most natural thing in the world and never cared about being insulted, this sanitation of, well everything, disgust me.
People have always cared about being insulted. Being a kind person is a fundamental survival instinct. Humans are social animals, and rely on trust. Sometimes people might say egregious things and there’s some room to sternly tell them that they are wrong, or even that what they are saying is harmful.
But this desire to be derogatory to other people just because you disagree with them isn’t healthy. I completely understand the appeal of telling someone to choke on a wet bag of turds when they say they’re pro-life or anti-gay-marriage or something, but that doesn’t get you anywhere. It’s just you losing control of your emotions and saying something stupid and getting yourself into trouble.
If someone has said something that upsets you, and you want to say something to them about it, take the time to articulate what the problem is and why it matters to you. Take the high road, and let them be the one to cast the first stone. Then you can report them and get them banned instead of giving them the satisfaction of doing it to you because you broke first.
I NEVER cared about taking the high road. I would feel like a… See? This is Problem, I can’t talk freely
You can talk freely, you just don’t have the emotional intelligence to talk in a way that people want to listen to, so people show you the door.
What you have discovered is that antisocial behavior has negative social consequences.
Not OP but had a thought reading your comment. I wonder how much of this perceived shift in language is driven by corpo’s sanitizing for advertisers and how much is young people who have been fully raised online.
As you say, humans are social animals. It makes sense to me then, that if you were raised within an online environment you would naturally extend that sociability to it. However, if much of this technology grow after you were socialized would you be more inclined to see it as a relief valve to vent anger into.
It is more an issue that the Internet lets people hide behind anonymity and avoid witnessing the actual consequences of their cruelty. It’s the same dynamic that can cause road rage: if they can’t see your face they don’t have to acknowledge your humanity, and therefore don’t have to care if they hurt you.
And that’s the issue. You can’t vent anger into the Internet without being an angry person in front of or at others. The Internet isn’t a soulless network of machines, it’s filled with real people. If you use other people as your anger relief valve, those people aren’t going to like you or want you around.
You are exactly the kind of person that causes me to avoid games I may play with randos, and keep all of my channels on a game muted.
I don’t chat with anyone dude.
So you are just yelling fuck you in your living room and getting banned?
I’m talking about live chat
And yet somehow you’re getting banned for saying “fuck you”.
I see a contradiction here.
Whereas from this end, this insistence upon having the “right” to be a vicious boor disgusts me.
And it turns out I’m far more normal in this regard than the opposing stance is, given that social media sites, et al are bleeding users over it.
Average lemmy user.
I don’t encourage insulting, but the most durable ones (and, by some peoples’ definitions, more tolerable, often because they appeal to some kind of truth) are usually the oddly creative/specific ones. For example, there’s the famous Shakespeare line “I’d engage a battle of wits with you, but I see you’re unarmed”. Basically what Dirty Harry and Sgt Hartman do. In contrast, you have things like the “F you” and the “a**hole” which just seem like you’re throwing what you can find.
It’s a simple solution; don’t hate. If you disagree, find a more creative way to express it besides “fuck off”.
Try this one: say “I hope the rest of your day is as pleasant as you are”
The real pro move is to learn to just roll your eyes, and walk away.
Or block them, and walk away.
It makes certain angry-on-the-internet types so so SO mad when you just shrug and ignore them, but alas, it’s a lost art since everyone likes being mad about everything all the time now.
You can’t be serious. That’s nothing
Well, you seem like are person that I don’t want to speak with even online. Have you thought you might be the prlem?
Then don’t
Well you can hate plenty without saying “fuck off”. You can stalk them and report anything they say that plausibly crosses the line. You can play passive-aggressive games. You can downvote. You can argue in poor faith.
Plenty of hateful ways to express yourself within the bounds of the rules. It’s arguably the path to success.
Why do you feel entitled to express anger or hatred toward people?
Because it feels right. What’s your guiding principal?
Well, for starters, when they say something that disgust me or pisses me off online. Not being able to express freely sucks
Have you considered that your anger can have consequences for people on the other side, and that this can even be harmful - and that if you feel disgusted or upset about something it doesn’t always give you the right to express that anger directly at someone?
I mean, I want to be sympathetic, I get how a corporate and sanitized internet can feel wrong and changes the kinds of community that are possible, e.g. young boys on Xbox live were known for saying vile things and riling one another up (as boys commonly do), but as someone who was also present in that culture at the time, not everyone felt at home or comfortable in that environment, and the bullying and culture often made me feel like I couldn’t enjoy those games.
Sometimes tolerance and civility is a small price to pay in exchange for making spaces accessible to other people. That said, I’m not sure every space needs to be like this - so again, I want to be sympathetic here.
There’s a saying in my mother tongue that goes like “say what you want, hear what you don’t”. Even in situations where you need to have a more coarse tone, having some level of finesse to the words sent would help not just in not getting sanctioned, but also on getting past people’s defenses more easily.
That shit NEVER works. Especially online, just for being a goodie 2 shoes online nobody is going to be “oh yeah you’re right, I apologise and I’ll change my ways” life isn’t a Disney movie
Finesse doesn’t mean bowing down to everyone. And indeed, expecting people to put their egos aside, at least quickly, is unrealistic, and even if the person takes in the points later on, chances of admitting are also low. But for example, if the person is clearly aggressive by his/her discourse, specially when including swear words, people tend to close down to whatever the first person is trying to say, or even respond proportionally aggressively.
Being told how to express yourself under threat of having the power to express yourself taken away appeals only to the cretins. Unfortunately the cretins are in the majority. They eat crap and smile.
What a mystery. Abuse upsets people, and upset people leave businesses where they get upset. And those businesses ban the abusers?
What. A. Shock.
Let’s pretend this isn’t online space and is, instead, say, the local deli. People go there to get food and see that a fellow customer likes to abuse people. The staff of the deli do nothing about it. So now people stop going to that deli and go somewhere else. (Note: not just the people being abused, but people who witness the abuse going unchallenged by the owner.)
So let’s go over the decision-making process:
- Say “meh” and let the abuser drive off multiple customers. (Lost customers: >> 1)
- Ban the abuser from the premises. (Lost customers: 1)
Which is the approach that doesn’t kill the business?
Now jack up the paint job, insert an online space, lower the paint job. Do you think the calculus is any different?
And in case you think people don’t leave because of this kind of abuse, I dropped Twitter (loooooooooooooooong before Apartheid Manchild was its owner!) despite only rarely being the recipient of abuse. It was the culture of abuse that was everywhere, in practically every thread, that made me decide Twitter was a festering shitpile. (Again, even before the Manchild took it over.) Sure the abusers were a minority, but they were basically in any thread that was in any way public. And that just wasn’t the vibe I was interested in.
I was writing something like “I understand but here’s why it has to be this way”, but then I read comments about not wanting to take the high road and how being nice gets you nowhere. So instead: when I was a young adult in the 2000’s, angrily telling someone to “go f themselves” face-to-face might get you punched in the mouth. Someone who started swearing at everyone whenever they were angry was labelled an asshole. It’s not like I spent those years in a weak, no-confrontation, “let’s hug instead” environment either - my friends and I just didn’t put up with regular disrespect. I’ll stop there because I don’t want to glorify violence - there are better ways to deal with insults and we didn’t fight often. Most of the time jackasses just didn’t get invited anymore.
My point: online, anonymous communication removed a lot of social and physical consequences of confrontation, but that doesn’t make being nasty alright. You may say, “It’s just a f you”, but your comments make me think that being nasty is the intent. Not trying to shame you but if I’m right about hurting others being the goal then: yeah, admittedly that’s not rare anymore but you can do better.
Also you say being nice doesn’t get you anywhere. I’d ask: when was the last time you told someone to f themselves and they were like, “Oh, I never considered that. You’ve won me over.” Trading insults online leaves everyone angry and encourages inventive cruelty so the other person is hurt more. Anger is natural - we all feel it and I need to self-censor all the damn time. But there are better ways to deal with being angry, and even to reduce the amount of time you spend angry.
Removed by mod
That’s very uncalled for
so you suddenly have a problem with someone swearing and being hateful?
The idea is to have freedom of expression AND to exercise it intelligently. It isn’t an either-or. Or it shouldn’t be.
Sure. thats not what OP is saying in their post though
It’s implied. Nobody wants assholes.
Most people generally consider those who habitually reach for “fuck you” to be assholes.
Perhaps that’s the problem.
Most of the people that I’ve met who habitually reach for “fuck you”, frame it as a question or an argument. Which is arguably worse. And somewhat common. Well, common in the conversations that I like to have.
just swearing at someone isn’t expressing it intelligently though
Sometimes it is. It depends.
Yes, because I didn’t insulted you or said anything offensive towards ANYONE here. You missed the point completely
Then clarify your point. All you have done is post about how you can’t swear at someone or be hateful towards them. And immediately proved the point why it’s not considered acceptable but somehow you’re missing the irony
Thought you didn’t care?
If my experiences have taught me anything, it’s that the act of caring is gradient. Sometimes it’s for the sake of onlookers that it occurs. I don’t strictly encourage insults, but the real enemy so-to-speak is escalation.
I literally said there’s a difference in my post between pure nasty accusations or racist and justified anger. You came here with a provocation that’s completely senseless.
It’s very interesting how you are instantly wanting nuance and understanding when you are on the receiving end. Do you really not see the hypocrisy here?
It’s messed up that you’re being downvoted. It’s strange to think that most of us never cross the lines established by the censors. They like having a daddy-cop to tell everybody how to talk.
