• zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    28 days ago

    The feel of a battleground text spam is well crafted. By Elon. The subsequent Harris spam today was “meh” at best.

    I’m already voting for Harris but this text spam from MAGA absolutely will hit chords with folks. The latest one made a claim then linked to an article that said as much. Sort of. But if you’re only reading the headline and the first line it’s a real gotcha. Theirs has pictures. Hers is a single run on sentence.

    More “we’re not going back” would resonate better, but it’s just not there. And today was the first Harris text that didn’t ask for money.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      If you are still being swayed, on October 28th, by MAGA spam texts, then you can fuck off.

      Edit: Obviously, I could have been more clear: I meant “you” as in the person reading these texts. To be clear, I do not disagree with anything you said. I made this comment out of frustration of the idea that there are people out there who will get a text from Trump one week before the election, and have it sway them.

      • nimble
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        27 days ago

        They said they are voting for Harris, and are offering feedback that the Harris texts could be done differently to make them more effective. It’s not the same as being “swayed”

      • zephorah@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        Read the post, don’t just skim over key words and react. They’re effective texts, probably, it’s an observation.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          I didn’t mean you, I meant “you” as in the reader of said texts. I was not disagreeing with you. Should have been more clear.