• mortakhal@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes. Food in the shop had a bad quality with a permanent deficit. Big amount of good food in modern country is making by a small business

    • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      This could be a language barrier thing, but it sounds like you’re talking about a production issue, not a censorship issue.

      • mortakhal@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        okay, despite the cultural and resource diversity, what prevented then in the Soviet Union from making normal food en masse for people like sushi or even shawarma? Why was there only sausage and chebureks, buns, vodka, beer everywhere? Because there is an order to do so and there is a chain of manufacturers, there was no initiative from below, although the country was supposed to be for the people. Due to the size of the state apparatus for serving the population, any initiative was lost. In the end, everything was done only when the old grandfather wanted to show off in front of the West :) there is nothing made of high quality in the Soviet Union, except for missiles that were sold to other countries to shoot at people :) and everything that served the military industry.

        • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m going to avoid touching the rest of that and say that a centralized production not making sushi or shawarma is not the same as censoring those things. You can still make them at home, it’s not like fish, rice, and seaweed were beyond the reach of the existing production. Again, it sounds like a production issue.

          • mortakhal@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            and the main reason for the deficit was preparation for the war, not the desire to make people’s lives in the country better. Nothing prevented the Soviet Union with the Communists at its head from being an ally before the war with the Germans, attacking Poland together and attacking Finland, suppressing protests in Czechoslovakia and Hungary

            • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m really struggling to follow some of this. Are you saying the Soviets didn’t need to fight Germany and didn’t need to take as much time as they could manage to prepare to do so?

              • mortakhal@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                The problem is that they were allies of Germany until Germany attacked them :) and they also wanted to conquer all of Europe, not just preparing to defend their own territory

                • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I chose to avoid most of the bait so far, even with those cloying :)s that you like adding so much, but this one is too disgusting. It’s historical revisionism pure and simple that they were ever “allies” with Germany. They had a treaty to try and stall German invasion, but they never imagined things would go otherwise than one party defeating the other (though they did underestimate how soon the Germans would attack).

          • mortakhal@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Okay :) but everything was in deficit :) and this is not a production problem :) this is a problem of sick heads in power and a complete lack of empathy for the country’s citizens :) in relations between people, the deficit created corruption, with which Ukraine still has big problems. A habit was created to solve all cases not according to the law. People could not travel abroad without a large number of certificates and the personal permission of the local head of the party. Soviet engineers, having good talents, proposed different concepts of cars that were very modern, but the local leadership said no to any initiative from below. It was easier for them to simply copy Western equipment, or buy Western equipment and pass it off as their own, as Russia is doing now under sanctions. Now, under capitalism, you can protest and at most they will give you something like a fine for hooliganism. Under the Soviet Union and the Communists, there were no protests, or if there were, people were sent to Siberia, and their families were dismissed from their positions, and they had a label in front of state bodies that their family was unreliable. And the journalists did not say anything about it under the pressure of censorship, not even a hint. People learned all the information about the protests only after the collapse of the Soviet Union. And something similar happens in any country that wants to build communism. People become communists in their eyes, often not for the sake of making the world better, but for the sake of getting back at a system in which they are marginalized and losers