• bbuez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’ve practically been groveling begging my girlfriend to switch.

      Its not that bad just ignore the ads

      Yeah I don’t go in replies because it’s always bots

      There’s still some things on there

      She didn’t really catch onto mastodon, discoverability is the problem imo. May try getting her onto bluesky even though it wouldn’t be my pick. Some people just like whatever they currently have more than change - which maybe not being able to block like EVERY OTHER media platform may be a big enough change.

      • Default_Defect@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Basically nothing I follow is on anything else because they need the numbers. The few people that are just copy their twitter posts and never actually engage.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        By all means, keep posting and perusing porn on the platform, when that and Elon will be all that’s left on Twitter, it’ll be ok.

    • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      A lot of people have professional reasons to be on Twitter. If you’re trying to promote a business you need to be where the people are and none of the alternatives have anywhere near Twitter’s size.

  • Soup@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    2 months ago

    Reminder: if you still have an account with that fucko’s service-

    You support everthing he does.

    • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve kept my account because it’s a sought after username. Deleting it would allow some grifter to take it over. It also predates both Elmo’s and the original Twitter accounts.

      I’ve not posted anything under it since the third party apps were blocked.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m keeping it just long enough to harass his ass. I’ll be all over him like Joe Biden on an ice cream cone, or Elon Musk on Trumps dick.

      • Soup@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 months ago

        I promise you: you’re not harassing him. You ARE however, supporting him by having an account.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 months ago

    If the block feature goes away, I guarantee it will come back for - at the very least - the highest tier of paid accounts almost immediately afterwards.

    I can’t imagine any of the large corps that still use Xitter for customer communication will be happy not being able to block serial trolls. Or people with legitimate grievances who won’t go away.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Could be worse. I never liked the idea of blocking “hiding” your content from other people to begin with. It makes it too easy to give trolls the confirmation they succeeded in getting under your skin, encouraging them to make another account to continue harassing their victim.

    • Kalysta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hopefully when Musk does this it will convince my addicted friends to drop the platform when their stalkers can all suddenly contact them again.

      Or maybe it’ll get the EU to ban the platform like Brazil did.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d say “for now”, but at least we’ve got the EU protecting us from that possibility.

  • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m pretty sure both the App Store and the Google Play Store both require social media apps to have a block feature. Will be interesting to see what happens if he goes through with this.

  • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 months ago

    As much as I despise Musk and Twitter and hope that both die a painful death, what is actually proposed here is honestly a change for the better: It’s not about preventing people from blocking users, it’s about blocked users being able to see public posts, which they could also see by just logging out. This is being honest about what a block does and avoids giving people a wrong sense of privacy that they simply don’t have on the platform. From what I’ve heard there is a possibility to post for followers-only which in combination with requiring approval to follow and that isn’t going away here either…

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 months ago

      Twitter massively reduced visibility for logged-out users, so just logging out doesn’t help, you have to log into a different account. This additional fraction reduces the amount of harassment a lot. Not sure that being “more honest” is worth the price, especially when an info box could achieve the same without making harassment easier.

      • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Twitter massively reduced visibility for logged-out users,

        I know, but it still didn’t fully remove it.

        Not sure that being “more honest” is worth the price

        The thing is that there really is no price, nor was there ever one. Your suggestion that you think there is demonstrates that the way blocking worked gave people dangerously wrong ideas. It’s about being clear to people what they can and cannot expect. Anything else is ACTUALLY dangerous.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I know, but it still didn’t fully remove it.

          Sure, but it doesn’t have to be fully removed to have an effect.

          The thing is that there really is no price, nor was there ever one. Your suggestion that you think there is demonstrates that the way blocking worked gave people dangerously wrong ideas.

          Sorry, but you don’t get to redefine how humans work. There is a price, because friction reduces the likelihood of people following through. Removing that friction increases the likelihood of people following through. You might not want to believe this to be the case, but please read studies on the topic - it’s just how humans work. You don’t get to dismiss negative effects because you don’t believe in them.

          • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            The argument here is literally about stalkers. Not about random uninterested people that don’t care.

            • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 months ago

              No, it’s not just about stalkers, it’s about harassment in general. But even if it were, even stalkers are still people and don’t work fundamentally different.

              Feel free to show any research proving me wrong, but unless you find any, the reasonable position is “humans work the same on this topic as on others”.

        • Opisek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Wearing a seatbelt in a moving vehicle does not magically prevent all deaths upon an accident. Do you recommend we should stop wearing seatbelts?

          If there are measures in place that reduce the danger of something happening, it’s not wise to remove them just because they’re not 100% effective.

          • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m not advocating against a seatbelt, I’m advocating against not wearing it, “because I am confident that I can hold on to something in case of a collision” or similar stupid reasons. Expecting that blocking does anything to hide public posts that you can simply open in another browser (or in the same browser in private browsing mode) is not a seatbelt, it is the equivalent of a slightly stronger handle on top of the car window that is being advertized as a feature to protect you in case of an accident.

            This change first and foremost makes it clear that that handle does nothing meaningful and that you should wear an actual seatbelt (follower-only posts, ideally with restricted followers) instead, if you are worried about a collision. Twitter is a public forum. You can’t tell people to leave you alone, shout with a megaphone across the marketplace and then be annoyed when they hear you. If you don’t want them to hear you, don’t use a megaphone.

    • halowpeano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nah, bullshit. This is 100% Musk’s fragile ego getting upset that people blocked him. He wants to be able to force his and his evil friends’ opinions into the faces of people who don’t want to see it.

      • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Please read again what he changed and then try to figure out why your rationale is clearly not what this is about.

  • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    I thought Twitter was once forced but a court to enable blocking for all users against all users. Isn’t this why we are able to block advertisers?

    • sibachian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      i seem to remember something similar. and blocking advertisers seems like it should be common law but i guess chrome killing adblockers takes predesence.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Remember to contact your political representative and express your concerns on any public organization account having an account on twitter. Also contact any journali of a media you use to read/watch and express the same concern.

    Once politics and journalists get out of twitter is game over.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      I agree that X is enemy territory now, but in a world where billionaires can buy up all the major means of communication, it doesn’t feel like enough to just close up our accounts and move on. They can follow us wherever our accounts go and buy platforms out from under us. Lemmy and Mastodon are slightly better as open decentralized platforms, but they still could be attacked by Musk if he had the initiative to.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        That was the one action I took on Twitter after creating an account before my account got banned.

        I needed to create an account to check a local source for updates. So I did. I also decided to look around on Twitter to see what I was “missing”. Saw a bunch of Musk stuff and instantly knew I didn’t want to see any of it. So I blocked him.

        In a few weeks, when I clicked a Twitter link, it said my account had been banned for suspicious activity. It had a secure password and this was its second log-in ever (no posts, comments, reactions, etc).

      • Tamo240@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Pretty sure you already can’t block him specifically, I’m not on Xitter but have heard from several people this is the case.

        • Ostrichgrif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          A friend has told me you can block Elon but his tweets still appear on your timeline as if you haven’t. He still uses Twitter and the only way he manages it is by blocking every blue check. He has 28,000 blocked accounts now…

          • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I just deleted the app from my own phone and locked my account, I moved my microblogging activity to Mastodon, and also using Lemmy more and more.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Otherwise how the bullies can continue to belittle the victim behind their backs?

      Switching to throwaway accounts is boring

    • SoleInvictus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I feel Musk is an experiment testing what would happen if you gave an Internet troll of middling intelligence billions of dollars.

  • mastazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have started to actively avoid brands, journalists etc. who still use Twitter as their primary social media presence.

  • Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    Meanwhile, everybody will continue to refuse to leave the platform, further showing Elon that there is no price too high for people.