• fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Reverse nepotism baby that wants to play archaeologist on Netflix. He’s also extremely paranoid that “big archaeology” (lmao) is out to get him because he cannot handle criticism from people that know what they’re talking about. Tldr weirdo on Netflix that thinks he’s a martyr.

    • norimee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Ha, now I wanna watch it. Might be fun if you treat it like it’s Cunk on Earth.

    • slickgoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Don’t have a boat in this race, but banning him from otherwise open historical sites because they don’t like his ideas is not scientific, but more like the mediaeval Catholic church.

      Science is full of bigoted thinking as any other discipline. If you don’t already know this, you have never met a scientist.

      Having said all that, it is a silly idea, but I enjoy the incidental geology that he employs to illustrate his argument. Not that I buy into the argument itself.

      • servobobo@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Quacks get banned/shunned because they’re usually obnoxious and abusive, not because they hold fringe ideas. If it was only the latter they’d fit right in in most fields.

        • slickgoat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You will have to point out where he was obnoxious or abusive. I’ve not seen either of these traits from watching the show.

          • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Well of course you’re not going to see anything negative on a show recorded and produced by the person you’re talking about. Historical sites aren’t just about the infrastructure/items, it’s about honoring the memories and past lives/accomplishments of our ancestors. In regards to the “snake” banning, that site already was embarrassed by a previous recording of ancient aliens, and historical sites have learned not to let organizations and promoters take over and misrepresent the cause and importance of those sites. From my understand they don’t even let in people like NPR, they are there as an educational resource and not to be hijacked as proof for a theory they don’t represent.

            Now if it was an actual scientist working on a scientific research paper? Sure, be outraged. A guy trying to film a show looking for evidence to prove a hypothesis? (not how the scientific method works) Completely delusional to get upset about it.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        My recent favorite is anthropology ignoring all evidence of women hunting because it didn’t fit social morals of the researchers. Even finding women buried with shields and weapons and people still making excuses.

        • slickgoat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          That’s a good example. Another is from my country, Australia. The idea that the Aborigines were just nomad hunter gatherers was seriously upset by the discovered fish farming settlements in the north of the country as well as the remains of basic stone buildings. Settler farmers have been destroying the evidence of these artifacts for 150 years because they upset the politics of “peaceful European settlement”.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Ancient Aliens is fun because the crazy people are so excited and engaged. They promote willful ignorance and antiscience stuff too, but at least we got Stargate out of the ancient astronaut malarky.

        This guy is boring and smugly antiscience. When the show came out, before I knew who he was and without warching a preview, it seemed like it was going to be about ancient cultures that atalled because of climate change or something along those lines. Nope, took a hard left into stupid territory.

        It is frustrating that these jerks ruin actual discussion about ancient cultures being older than we think. Especially when we keep finding older evidence of innovation or oceanic travel that double our estimates on the earliest examples. Like there had to be a significant period of human innovation prior to the oldest sites we know of with massive stone megaliths. The smaller pieces are just harder to find, or may not be recognizeable as intentionally carved!