• Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      2 months ago

      Back when we were doing quadratic equations; I wrote a program on my TI-84 that would ask which parts of the equation you already had, and would fill in the rest for you.

      My teacher liked it so much he bought a transfer cable for those calculators so he could get a copy for himself. Then used to to grade tests.

      • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        2 months ago

        I did the same thing. It was allowed in general, with the correct thought, “if you can code it yourself, you know the content”

        I had another “program” that would fail to run but that’s because I wrote notes into it. Doubt that was allowed.

          • piecat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Oh I would have been so pissed. I was programming on my calculator 24/7 instead of my classes.

            I wrote a sudoku “editor”

            I put that in quotes because I had a grid that could be navigated, arrows moved, storing the numbers, had number entry down. And when it was time to implement the solver, I learned the hard way what p vs np is.

          • sem
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            They did that here too, but students would use a cheat program that made it look like teachers were resetting it, but really the memory was safe

            • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I don’t remember if they fully closed the loopholes, but there are inputs that programs cannot catch unless you actually replace the OS.

              • sem
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                My memory is pretty hazy but the cheat application emulated the process that teachers used to do a system reset.

                Iirc, it let you press menu, select reset, confirm, and showed the (fake) confirmation screen.

                Also IIRC, you had to install it from Mirage OS, which I don’t think was an OS (?) but rather an app that everyone had to play games from.

        • thejml@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I did that but made it return success before it got to the notes. You had to scroll to get to the notes, but it looked innocuous before that.

        • UNY0N@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Oh god I remember doing that too. Those “programs” were the best. I even mad sure to make the code long, so that even if someone thought to take a look at the code they would have to scroll for a while to find the notes.

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 month ago

        I could never remember the formula to calculate compound interest.

        But I had no trouble writing a for loop.

          • linearchaos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I would just rebuild something in my head like this every time.

            While i < n; k=k+(k*r); i++;

            You’d think I could remember k(1+r)^n but when you posted, it looked as alien as it felt decades ago.

            • VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              The use of for makes sense.

              k=0; for (i=0; i<n; i++) k=k+f(i); is the same as k=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} f(i)

              and

              k=1; for (i=0; i<n; i++) k=k*f(i); is the same as k=\prod_{i=0}^{n-1} f(i)

              In our case, f(i)=1+r and k=1; for (i=0; i<n; i++) k*(1+r); is the same as k=\prod_{i=0}^{n-1} (1+r) = (1+r)^n

              All of that just to say that exponentiation is an iteration of multiplication, the same way that multiplication is an iteration of addition

        • BluesF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          What always annoyed me was having to draw charts by hand. Just let me put the data in a computer for god’s sake, the rest of the working is there… I did actually write a python function for one of my assignments which was fine, but they told me not to do it for the exam.

      • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I made one to decompose polynomials it was very good because it showed all the steps it was literally just copy what’s on the calc to the page

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      As someone who was a kid who would do things like this to avoid putting in the work, no this kid will probably not be fine.

  • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ok but calculators are only allowed in math class and if there’s one thing language models suck at, it’s doing basic math. Forget anything at least as complicated as algebra

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Dude, I was wondering why someone hadn’t done this the moment they discovered Ai was terrible at math. I would have imagine the crowds who deal with both would have some overlap at least.

    • OozingPositron@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      For me they weren’t allowed in Calc I, II, III, Alg I, II and Differential equations. Every other class pretty much required it.

      if there’s one thing language models suck at, it’s doing basic math.

      If you’re using a GPT 3.5 turbo level models, sure. Synthetic data is perfect for teaching LLMs, o1 will be good enough up to Calc III IMO, maybe even better.

      The only thing I don’t like about this is that it uses a TI, yikes.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        LLMs do suck at math, if you look into it, the o1 models actually escape the LLM output and write a python function to calculate the output, I’ve been able to break their math functions by asking for functions that use math not in the standard Python library.

        I know someone also wrote a wolfram integration to help solve LLMs math problems.

      • skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        They let us use them for all my college math classes.

        They really don’t help much at all if you don’t understand the math, and if you do understand, you don’t need the calculator most of the time.

        • toddestan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That’s also what my upper level math courses were like in college. In high school and the first couple of years of college I got good use out of my graphing calculator, but after that I reached the point where all of its advanced features were no longer useful. I just ended up leaving it at home and brought my old TI-30 Solar for class for the occasional time I had to crunch some actual numbers.

        • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Don’t know about university math, but this applied to a lot of the stuff in my last years of school. Since we always had a part where you were required to solve everything without a calculator you had to be able to do everything without it. For algebra and Calculus it just meant that you were able to do the math more efficiently. For statistics the calculator was basically useless, since it didnt help you if you didnt knew what you had to do, what was basically the only hard part of it.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        TI, yikes.

        Yeah, well, TI has spent bucketloads of money bribing textbook publishers to only include instruction for their specific models so they are now the de facto standard in American schools. This is apparently legal.

        Anyway, team Casio represent.

        • OozingPositron@feddit.cl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sorry, I’m an HP guy. I love their calculators, hate everything else they do, except their plotters maybe.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 month ago

    I used to store formulas in basic programs in my ti84 but they were never useful because I didn’t need help memorizig formulas

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I just wrote programs that would solve the complicated multi step problems and show me the work.

    • WorseDoughnut 🍩@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wrote one that printed a fake “memory cleared” screen so I could keep my stored stuff saved even if the protectors wanted to see us wipe the storage.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      2 months ago

      They added wifi with a extra circuit board hidden inside the calculator case. It’s connected to the calculators communication port, and pretends to be another calculator. So they can use the calculator’s built in “send” function to send variables/text/etc to the hidden card, which then uses it’s internet connection to look up answers and send the results back.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 month ago

    “ChatGPT what is the formula for Work Done in an enclosed system expressed as a triple integral?”

    “42”

    “Ok cool ty.”

    • model_tar_gz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Stop giving me Thermo nightmares; I lived through that shit already I don’t need to sleep through it too.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yeah but at least work on an enclosed system is always zero. Idk why but I always chuckle about that.

        Sure, you can prove it in like 4 to 8 lines of multivariate calculus, but its always gonna be 0.

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, nobody in class is going to suspect the kid with the arduino-type science project mess of wires duct taped to their calculator.

    For those too lazy to read, that’s how this works. An external micro controller talks to the calc through the IO port, and does the Wifi stuff, acting as a middleman.

    Edit: I did not see the video.

    • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wonder what can counter this except banning it, or provide calculators to students instead of using their own.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Its been quite a while since I’ve taken a proctored exam, but then all the proctors would clear all the memory on your calc before they’d let you use it for test. Is that not the case anymore?

    • Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Depends on the exam. Some don’t even allow programmable calcs because they don’t want to deal with possible shit like this. I have already seen a certification exam where they provide the calculators as well.

    • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The article said it can be download “on demand” so that might make the clearing pointless.

    • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      The launcher program can be downloaded on-demand, avoiding detection if a teacher inspects or clears the calculator’s memory

      If I understood it correctly, the Wi-Fi module appears as a standard calculator-to-calculator interface, so built-in commands can install the cheat apps at any time.

  • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Utilizing the tools available to you to solve problems is not cheating, its resourcefulness, and using your brain. Which is of course frowned upon in schools that exist to churn out mindless drones for corporate enslavement.

  • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    What would happen if now plug in another calculator? AFAIK that only a P2P connection and never meant for >2 parties.