• Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    The whole political discussion about Internet media licensing, like a 10-15€ tax to finance artists while making piracy global. In the end we have the same except it’s financing Internet millionaires over artists

    • bizarroland@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      Is it weird that I don’t want to pay for any streaming media, I don’t have a cable package, but if some reasonable system were created such as that I could have access to digital copies of media for a flat monthly rate I would pay it?

      Like if someone would come and just say you pay $80 a month and you can watch listen to or read anything you can find and save them all locally for future reuse, no problems, I would probably pony up.

      • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes I’m also the same way with ads. I’d happily spend more for internet if there was somehow an “ad surcharge” that would mean I’d never see ads or be tracked. Let me pay whatever the advertisers pay.

          • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I already do. I also want to pay my way.

            The problem is what I’d like doesn’t exist (I’m not going to subscribe you a million different websites and still not even be ad free) and probably can’t. How much do all the ads I’m blocking cost? It’d be ripe for abuse but I’d essentially like a taxi meter, but it would charge me for website use from just one central account that I top up or is part of my internet bill or whatever.

            I want the whole business model of using ads and tracking to pay for the internet to not exist.