• Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Oh. I assumed you meant as a baby. I guess this is a rare reason to have this done as a baby.

    • Bremmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      What’s the reason to have it done as a baby? There is no reason; you can’t determine any potential penis issues someone might have while they’re a baby

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        There are a small number of complications that can arise, including some that require the procedure to be done later. Obviously this is more traumatic for a teenager than a baby that doesn’t have modesty issues and heals much, much faster.

        But what you do with your kids is up to you. I’m not gonna be there standing over your shoulder.

        • Bremmy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          There’s a small number of complications that can arise from anything, we don’t use that as an excuse to preemptively perform surgery on babies. The issues that can come from botching genital mutilation far outweigh any “benefits”. People have killed themselves over this

          Any surgery later in life is traumatic. That’s not a good excuse either

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Bruh.

      I was circumcised as an infant. I didn’t find out about the nerve damage until I was a teenager.

      You know how puberty works? For me it was how it always was, and I didn’t know something was wrong until an ER trip.