• BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    4 months ago

    What about “Well researched hobbyist”

    Sometimes the cheapest option is so much worse than just getting the right gear from the beginning.

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah the attitude of negativity against this is basically “you aren’t really into my hobby until you’ve spent twice as much money by starting with the crappy equipment and upgrading when you realize its crap”.

      • greenskye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 months ago

        Or the beginner gear makes the hobby super tedious and difficult. Who knows if you would’ve liked it with proper tools instead of trying to make it work with a shitty, poorly working set up.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t think people will judge you for not getting the worst stuff. As a cyclist I’m judging the person who hasn’t ridden in a decade and decides to buy a carbon fiber bike with all the coolest custom stuff, not the person who buys a steel or aluminum bike from a well respected shop. The Walmart bikes are better than walking but there’s a big jump there and it’s in reliability. The top of the line carbon fiber frame is less reliable, but it weighs less and as such high level riders and racers will see benefits there. A newb should buy a steel frame of an appropriate size from someone who can help make sure it’s the right bike for them. That’s the well researched hobbyist.