Seen this in many houses, people upgrade their lighting setup and install a dimmer. Which works. But usually it also makes the lights flicker unintentionally, which is super annoying IMO.

Now, my understanding of electrical engineering is pretty rudimentary so I’d appreciate more something that explains the concept in a way that Cavewoman Mothra can understand rather than something technically accurate.

Thanks

  • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    LED lights are either all on or all off, the only way to dim a LED, is to make it blink really fast and change the time it’s on vs the time it’s off. Cheap LED lights don’t blink fast enough, so you see them flicker.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s not the only way to dim an LED, just the cheapest. Variable current power regulators are the premium option.

      A screw-in LED bulb combines LEDs and power regulating electronics. Some of them handle the variable input voltage a household dimmer provides gracefully, but that’s more expensive.

      • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Changing the current can change the hue (color) of the led. In some cases it’s okay in some cases it isn’t. Cinema lights for instance don’t dim with voltage because of that. Instead they have 3 separate drivers synchronized to dim in a canon. One after the other so that there is always the same number of LEDs on at all time regardless of the dimmer level.

        • demesisx@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Hi Lazaro!

          That’s not always true, actually. For example, Digital Sputnik lights (and some LED tape that I have that I use my current control dimmers on) utilize current control dimming. This alternative type of dimming allows them to work even with super high speed frame-rates due to having very little or even no perceivable flicker. It’s certainly unpopular in comparison to PWM but definitely not unheard of in the film industry.


          I used to use the technique you mention with >2K tungsten lights for footage above 1000 fps. I figured out (in the absence of a budget that could afford a DC rectifier) that if I ran the same amount of lights on each of the legs of a 3 phase Delta style Gennie that they would effectively fill in each others’ pulses. I further enhanced that effect by shining all 6 5K’s (for example) on the same rag.

          I used that technique here: https://youtu.be/w9-NoEnWSgk

          • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s awesome! I love how deep we are going with this! I have to admit I don’t k or as much about cinema lighting as I know about cameras and Steadicam.

            • demesisx@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’m happy to share any experiences I have had as we’re likely the only two filmmakers in the whole fediverse right now!

              :)

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s true. Describing current regulation as the premium option was an oversimplification. For household lighting, it’s usually the premium option.