think I forgot this one

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve already seen people go absolutely fucking crazy with this - from people posting trans-supportive Muskrat pictures to people making fucked-up images with Nintendo/Disney characters, the utter lack of guardrails has led to predictable chaos.

    Between the cost of running an LLM and the potential lawsuits this can unleash, part of me suspects this might end up being what ultimately does in Twitter.

    • David Gerard@awful.systemsOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 months ago

      lotta this is being used for blatantly political speech, really DIY editorial cartoons, e.g. the image we used

      its eagerness to give you a school shooting, not so much

    • rxin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      deleted by creator

      • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        It hasn’t been hashed out in court yet, but I suspect AI mickey will be considered copyright infringement, rather than public domain.

        • rxin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          deleted by creator

          • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            You’re not wrong. Precisely how this AI debacle will strengthen copyright I don’t know, but I fully anticipate it will be strengthened.

    • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I get why this is bad, but gimp is free for years and you can make whatever you want with it. Is it just that these AI programs need no skill at all? Where do you draw the line here?

      • sc_griffith@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 months ago

        why do I need to know where to “draw the line” when something clearly sucks shit?

        > billionaire funds the mass production of vampires

        > “look, people have been eating meat for ages. where do you draw the line? you can’t say this is bad unless you draw the line”

      • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s also an accountability issue. If you create something in GIMP or whatever everyone agrees that you did that and are responsible for any copyright issues or defamation or whatever else arises from that work. That becomes fuzzier when people start saying “Grok made this!” Especially because Grok does operate according to a model that can and does go beyond whatever it’s been instructed to do, so you might be able to plausibly argue that if you craft the prompt right.

        And I can guarantee that the cesspool formerly known as Twitter will try to play whichever side of that is more advantageous to them. Copyright infringement? That’s on the user. Unique IP? Well, Grok had a profound and independent creative role and so we deserve a piece.