• cowfodder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          66
          ·
          2 months ago

          Is it really a criticism though? There’s nothing of merit to it. I could see criticizing the pick based on Walz’s views (though I’d probably argue against that too; Walz has a pretty stellar record).

          He’s basically the same age as Harris, so the “old” portion of the criticism is right out the window. What we’re left with is that he’s a white man, which is always what the VP pick was going to be. The unfortunate truth in this country is that a lot of voters are not ready to support a presidential ticket with two women or people of color.

        • Tyfud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s not how criticism works. There needs to be something of substance for a critique to have merit.

          This was just stereotyping someone based on their looks. You know, the thing we give the other side shit for doing with Harris. It’s not productive, not a good look, and outside of the internet it’s a great way to tell the people around you that you have nothing of value to add to a conversation or discussion.

          • ABCDE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            A criticism of something and a critique imply different things; criticism can be short, like theirs was, and that is fine for online forums. You can, of course, criticise their criticism, I can can criticise that.

          • ABCDE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Your post is whining with nothing constructive. Not all criticism needs to be so constructive, it’s an online forum. But, it’s a criticism of the establishment of old white men, which many of us are tired of.

    • CompostMaterial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is obviously a cycle we need to break. That said, a campaign has to make choices that lead to victory. Kamala is already a person of color and a woman. If she wins, it would be only the second time to have a non-white President and the first woman.

      The fact is that while many us are hungry for change to the old norms, many will be more conservative to change (and I don’t mean in the crazy MAGA way). Having an old white guy on the ticket acts as an anchor for those who are too scared to fully jump into all out change, ensuring that those votes aren’t lost to the other side.

      • dodgy_bagel
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Holy fuck that ancient guy is young!

        How the fuck do you age like that?

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well he has a job that can be very stressful and in the White Guys For Harris interview, he talked about him and his wife fighting SEVEN YEARS to conceive, so that may well have taken its toll too.

          And then there’s the ever present danger of being hit by an errant hockey puck or violated by a moose or an elk inherent to life in Minnesota, of course.