• DMBFFF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 months ago

    partially because he got into legal hassles for using an AR-15 to defend himself against people who wanted to harm him.

    • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      186
      ·
      4 months ago

      My guy, he crossed state lines with a firearm that wasn’t his, to go to a protest where the only people injured and killed were by his trigger finger because he put himself that situation. That’s not defending yourself. He’s functionally a home invader crying over the dead body of the homeowner he killed because the homeowner brandished a skateboard.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        85
        ·
        4 months ago

        No, no, his friend bought him the gun because he couldn’t buy it himself. But somehow that wasn’t a straw purchase.

      • DMBFFF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        He’s functionally a home invader crying over the dead body of the homeowner he killed because the homeowner brandished a skateboard.

        poor analogy.

        Home invaders want to rob and those in the homes are innocent victims, and it was a glock, not a skateboard.

        I have little tolerance for looters and vandals, some of whom might be wp:agent provocateurs.

          • FireTower@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            4 months ago

            He’s referencing Gaige Grosskreutz who had a Glock. Anthony Huber was the one who attempted to use a skateboard as a bludgeon. Joseph Rosenbaum attempted to take Rittenhouse’s rifle after he had tried to distance himself.

            https://youtu.be/GrVKqTCdM-A

            Grosskreutz was hit in the arm and testified to aiming his pistol at Rittenhouse during the televised trial.

    • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t know why I’m bothering to feed a troll. But he literally travelled there in order to put himself in a situation where he might have to defend himself because he wanted to fucking shoot someone. He purposefully created the opportunity to shoot someone without having to “technically” be the attacker.

        • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I hope you make a sincere attempt to understand why your comment is being downvoted so much and I truly hope you use this as an opportunity to grow as a compassionate human being

          • DMBFFF@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’m being downvoted because I’m taking a rightist position in a forum of leftists, some who are quite thoughtful, others aren’t and are reactive.

            • Hegar@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              50
              ·
              4 months ago

              You’re being downvoted because you’re objectively wrong, factually and morally. The kid went out with the intention to kill someone, brought the tools to do it, and did it. It was absolutely premeditated. He killed people trying to disarm him. He did not act in self defense, he murdered 2 people in cold blood.

              He was allowed to get away with it because the republican party and their allies want to encourage more vigilantes to be killing leftists and minorities.

          • DMBFFF@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            I could be wrong as I’ve yet to read the Wikipedia article.

            Who did he kill: a few guys who were guilty of nothing, but their blackness made them targets of a bigot; or were they engaged in criminal activity and then threatened him when he showed up. If it’s the former, then he’s a criminal who should be prosecuted. If it’s the latter, I feel a bit freer to indulge in moral relativism.

            • Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              4 months ago

              I’d say the swathes of downvotes and removal of your comments by mods would make you go read about it before jumping to his defence.

    • p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Fuck off. He went out of his way to Cross state lines just to shoot someone. Then, he murdered someone in cold blood. Pathetic that people like you are still sucking his Dick…