A former Bungie employee was laid off just a week before they were due to start maternity leave, they have said.

That Bethesda Union looking even better now.

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.oneEnglish
    198·
    2 months ago

    Just yesterday, it was alleged that Bungie’s CEO Pete Parsons had purchased 24 cars cumulatively valued at $2.5m just before the layoffs. Parson’s Twitter account went private yesterday, too.

    Pete Parsons thanks all the plebs who lost their job. If the plebs didn’t lose their jobs, Pete Parsons would not be able to buy 24 cars.

        • ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world
          25·
          2 months ago

          I heard the secret sauce is kerosene but no idea why, so I just looked it up!

          Didn’t find anything conclusive about the specific comparison between the two, aside from Kerosene being less volatile than gasoline

          Maybe it’s because it’s safer to make/transport, or gels differently, or maybe they’re wrong and gas is just better.

          • EldritchFeminity
            10·
            2 months ago

            To quote a YouTube comment I can’t stop thinking about, “The thermite mixture is a combination of finely powdered aluminum and iron(III) oxide (also called ferric oxide) in a mass ratio of 1:3 respectively, a 5-7.5cm length of fireworks sparkler.”

            Why this was a comment on a War Thunder video will have me guessing forever.

          • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
            1·
            2 months ago

            Kerosene is weird man. I was on acid once and we kept trying to light it on fire with a direct butane flame and it wouldn’t light. Lit a leaf on fire and dropped it and that worked just fine… lol. Never looked into that but was “amazed” while on acid 😆

    • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
      6·
      2 months ago

      Pete Parsons thanks all the plebs who lost their job. If the plebs didn’t lose their jobs, Pete Parsons would not be able to buy 24 cars.

      That’s as many as 2.4 tens. And that’s terrible.

  • grue@lemmy.worldEnglish
    81·
    2 months ago

    That employee needs to get over her simping mentality and sue for the gender discrimination Bungie is blatantly guilty of. I don’t give a shit if they happened to be doing a mass layoff at the same time; you don’t get rid of somebody right before their already-scheduled maternity leave!

    • Azzu@lemm.ee
      38·
      2 months ago

      I’m not sure you have a case if the percentage of women on maternity leave in the fired group is roughly the same as in the non-fired group.

      If it isn’t illegal to fire people taking maternity leave specifically, which I don’t think it is in the US, you’re out of luck. The only illegal thing is firing people because of maternity leave. Since there was a mass layoff, it can easily be argued that the maternity leave was not the reason.

      The US needs better labor laws, and thus unions. An individual can’t do anything against it.

      • grue@lemmy.worldEnglish
        29·
        2 months ago

        There are two possibilities. Either:

        1. The decision to lay the person off was made before the maternity leave was scheduled, in which case I’d argue she has a case for detrimental reliance, or

        2. The decision to lay the person off was made after the maternity leave was scheduled, in which case a prima facie assumption is fair to make that the taking of leave obviously colored the supervisor’s evaluation and contributed to the layoff, and the burden is on the employer to prove otherwise.

        • Azzu@lemm.ee
          7·
          2 months ago

          Or option 3: manager made sure not to discriminate against non-maternity-leave people by not overly firing them compared to people on maternity leave.

          If they only fired people not on maternity leave, they could sue about being discriminated against.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        3·
        2 months ago

        In fact, there’s an argument to be made that they must terminate her, because Terminating everybody but those with scheduled maternity leave has a disparate impact on employees who are not pregnant.

    • Dem Bosain@midwest.socialEnglish
      18·
      2 months ago

      Seriously? It happened to someone I used to work with (last November). Except they laid her off while she was on maternity leave.

      • Huschke@lemmy.world
        14·
        2 months ago

        My wife was at home for 3 months before the birth of our child and 2 years afterward. I always considered that not enough.

        I can’t imagine living in a country where you could be laid off before or even worse during your maternity leave.

  • p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world
    76·
    2 months ago

    I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again (even though I’m not a big fan of bungie’s sketchy business practices and gameplay decisions). ALL GAME STUDIOS NEED TO FOLLOW BETHESDAS EXAMPLE AND UNIONIZE.

    Pete is a piece of shit.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.eeEnglish
        9·
        2 months ago

        I’m not a console player, so I had to wait till the sequel to have that shit happen to me. All I knew was “People like this Destiny thing, maybe Destiny 2 will be awesome?”

        With Destiny 2 they kept releasing expansion packs every five seconds and actively removing older content from the game making me not sure which expansion packs will actually do anything, and confusing the shit out of newer players who can’t keep up with the lore because older story missions were removed.

        I liked the base game, but… then we had like 3 expansion packs drop in 6 months, and in that time we had to migrate the accounts from Blizzard to Steam, and all the packs were about the price of a whole new game…

        They dragged me in to the MMOFPS concept, and immediately kicked me out when I didn’t want to whale. Or at least, that’s what it felt like

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      3·
      2 months ago

      It was great in the beginning. But yeah I’m not sure why anyone trusts the leadership who pulled a bait and switch on their customers.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    14·
    2 months ago

    Really need to have a clear definition of “stay afloat”

    Stockholm syndrome, man…

  • huginn@feddit.it
    3·
    2 months ago

    Right but this was before maternity leave started. I’m saying that promises of mat leave are important at conception and nowhere on earth does a company end up on the hook for maintaining their mat leave policy based on when you conceived

    • LostAndFound@lemmy.world
      22·
      2 months ago

      Relying on maternity money from a company is really some third world shit. It should be provided by the state. Now the company is welcome to add further compensation and that’s a nice perk but it shouldn’t be needed.

      • huginn@feddit.it
        20·
        2 months ago

        If the company offers it the company must make good on the promise come time. That’s all I’m saying.

        Free healthcare is obviously a requirement for civilization, as is maternal leave.

        I’m saying that the companies themselves cannot have empty promises like this. The act of conception was at very least influenced by the company’s offer of maternal leave.

        They should be on the hook - Make good what you have promised.